Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-20 of 33249
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Paul Feenstra, Teguewinde Sawadogo, Bruce Smith, Victor Janzen, Anne McLellan, Helen Cothron, Sean Kil
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. April 2023, 145(2): 021403.
Paper No: PVT-21-1059
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Journal Articles
Article Type: Research-Article
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. April 2023, 145(2): 021402.
Paper No: PVT-21-1058
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the MSUB test rig setup for two-phase flow tests More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 2 MSUB test rig setup for two-phase flow tests More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 3 Cross-section of U-tube bundle showing tube numbering scheme and instrumentation layout (units in mm) More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 4 Photograph of the AVB module installed at support location #1 More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 5 Photograph of the upstream end of a void fraction probe showing its location relative to the gap between two upper dummy tubes More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 6 Illustration of the first mode for a middle row U-tube, with the AVBs at locations #1 and #2 not effective More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 7 Amplitude response of selected U-tubes in the first IP mode versus HEM pitch flow velocity for one AVB support at location #1 for configuration 1. Data point labels indicate the HEM void fraction. More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 8 Sample vibration response spectra in the IP direction ( a ) and OOP direction ( b ), where the tube bundle is stable in the IP direction More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 9 Illustration of the third OOP mode shape for a middle row U-tube, assuming ineffective AVB supports More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 10 Sample vibration response spectra where the tube bundle is fluidelastically unstable in the IP direction More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 11 Test conditions in two-phase flow and the thresholds for onset and cessation of IP FEI for ( a ) configuration 1 tests and ( b ) configuration 2 tests More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 12 Sample frequency spectra from configuration 2 damping tests in two-phase flow, with one flexible tube in an otherwise restrained tube bundle More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 13 Example data for damping ratio measured at comparable flow conditions for configurations 1 and 2 More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 14 Measured and HEM void fraction for a two-phase flow test in configuration 2 More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 15 Sample results for work-rate and RMS IP displacement versus HEM pitch flow velocity for ( a ) tube 1B and, ( b ) tube 1D More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part II: Tests in Two-Phase Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 16 Stability plot for threshold conditions for the cessation of IP FEI for configurations 1 and 2 tests, along with liquid flow and air flow results More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part I: Tests in Air Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 1 MSUB test rig More
Image
in Investigations of In-Plane Fluidelastic Instability in a Multispan U-Bend Tube Array—Part I: Tests in Air Flow
> Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 2 Cross-section of U-tube bundle showing tube numbering scheme and instrumentation layout (units in mm) More