Design and manufacturing firms are under significant pressure to simultaneously increase product complexity, reduce design cycles, decrease cost, and improve quality. A key enabler to reduce cost without sacrificing quality is the control of variation during both design and manufacturing. The best time to reduce the impact of variation is in the early stages of design. This paper presents a tool set used to identify, early in the design process, where variation will have significant impact on the final cost and quality of a product. It presents the design team with a graphical view of variation risk, enabling them to quickly identify high-risk areas. The uncertainty about process capability and risk is also quantified and presented to the user.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Cycles, Design, Manufacturing, Modeling, Pressure, Risk, Risk management, Simulation, Teams, Uncertainty
1.
Ardayfio, M. A., 1998, “Methods for Capturing Design Intent Using Key Characteristics,” MSc, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2.
Arrow, K. J., 1971, Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, Markham Publishing Company, Chicago.
3.
Chen, T., and Thornton, A., 1999, “Quantitative Selection of Inspection Plans,” Accepted ASME DEC-DTM conference, Las Vegas, ASME.
4.
Clausing, D., 1995, “EQFD and Taguchi, Effective Systems Engineering,” First Pacific Rim Symposium on Quality Development, Sydney.
5.
Cunningham, T. W., Mantripragada, R., Lee, D. J., Thornton, A. C., and Whitney, D. E., 1996, “Definition, Analysis and Planning of a Flexible Assembly Process,” Proceedings of the Japan/USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, Boston, MA, ASME.
6.
Ertan, B., 1998, “Analysis of Key Characteristic Methods and Enablers Used in Variation Risk Management,” MSc, MIT, Cambridge.
7.
Fowlkes, W. Y., and Creveling, C. M., 1995, Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design: Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts.
8.
Frey, D., Otto, K., and Wysocki, J., 1998, “Evaluating Process Capability Given Multiple Acceptance Criteria,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, (to appear).
9.
Jay, D. J., 1998, “Evaluation and Assessment of Variation Risk Management and the Supporting Tools and Techniques,” MSc, MIT, Cambridge.
10.
Kazmer, D., Barkan, P., and Ishii, K., 1996, “Quantifying Design and Manufacturing Robustness Through Stochastic Optimization Techniques,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA.
11.
Kim, K., Cormier, D. R., O’Grady, P. J., and Young, R. E., 1995, “A System for Design and Concurrent Engineering Under Imprecision,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.
12.
Law, W. S., and Antonsson, E. K., 1994, “Including Imprecision in Engineering Design Calculations,” DE-Vol 68. Design Theory and Methodology—DTM ’94, Minneapolis, MN, ASME.
13.
Lee, D., and Thornton, A., 1996, “The Identification and Use of Key Characteristics in the Product Development Process,” ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Irvine, CA.
14.
Maggio, G., 1996, “Space Shuttle Probabilistic Risk Assessment: Methodology & Application,” Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Conference, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 121–132.
15.
Otto, K. N., and Antonsson, E. K., 1995, “Propagating Imprecise Engineering Constraints,” Proceedings of the 1995 FUZZ/IEEE Conference, Yokohama, Japan.
16.
Parkinson
A.
,
1995
, “
Robust Mechanical Design Using Engineering Models
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
117(B)
, pp.
48
–
54
.
17.
Phadke, M. S., 1989, Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, PTR Prentice-Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
18.
Soyucayli
S.
, and
Otto
K. N.
,
1998
, “
Simultaneous Engineering of Quality Through Integrated Modeling
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN
, Vol.
120
, No.
2
, pp.
211
–
220
.
19.
Suh, N. P., 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York.
20.
Sweder
T.
,
1995
, “
Driving for Quality
,”,
Assembly
Vol.
38
, No.
8
, pp.
28
–
33
.
21.
Taguchi, G., 1993, Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream, ASME Press, New York.
22.
Tata, M., and Thornton, A., 1999, “Process Capability Database Usage In Industry: Myth vs. Reality,” submitted to the ASME DFM DETC ’99 conference, Las Vegas, NV, ASME.
23.
Thornton, A. C., 1997, “Using Key Characteristics to Balance Cost and Quality During Product Development,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Sacramento, CA, ASME.
24.
Thornton, A. C., 1998, “Quantitative Selection of Variation Reduction Plans,” Design Theory and Methodology Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia.
25.
Whitney, D. E., 1988, “Manufacturing by Design,” Harvard Business Review, pp. 83–91.
26.
Zemel, M. I., and Otto, K. N., 1996, “Use of Injection Molding Simulation to Assess Critical Dimensions and Assign Tolerances,” Design for Manufacturing Conference, ASME Design Technical Conferences, Irvine, CA.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1999
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.