Field testing of gas turbine compressor packages requires the accurate determination of efficiency, capacity, head, power and fuel flow in sometimes less than ideal working environments. Nonetheless, field test results have significant implication for the compressor and gas turbine manufacturers and their customers. Economic considerations demand that the performance and efficiency of an installation are verified to assure a project?s return on investment. Thus, for the compressor and gas turbine manufacturers, as well as for the end-user, an accurate determination of the field performance is of vital interest. This paper describes an analytic method to predict the measurement uncertainty and, thus, the accuracy, of field test results for gas turbine driven compressors. Namely, a method is presented which can be employed to verify the validity of field test performance results. The equations governing the compressor and gas turbine performance uncertainties are rigorously derived and results are numerically compared to actual field test data. Typical field test measurement uncertainties are presented for different sets of instrumentation. Test parameters that correlate to the most significant influence on the performance uncertainties are identified and suggestions are provided on how to minimize their measurement errors. The effect of different equations of state on the calculated performance is also discussed. Results show that compressor efficiency uncertainties can be unacceptably high when some basic rules for accurate testing are violated. However, by following some simple measurement rules and maintaining commonality of the gas equations of state, the overall compressor package performance measurement uncertainty can be limited and meaningful results can be achieved.

ASME PTC 10, 1979, “Compressors and Exhausters.”
ASME PTC 19.1, 1985, “Measurement Uncertainties.”
ASME PTC 22, 1985, “Gas Turbine Power Plants.”
ISO 2314, 1989, “Gas Turbines-Acceptance Tests,” Geneve.
VDI 2045, 1993, “Acceptance and Performance Tests on Turbo Compressors and Displacement Compressors,” Duesseldorf.
VDI 2048, 1978, “Inaccuracies in Acceptance Test Measurements,” Duesseldorf.
Fozi, A.A., 1995, “Field Testing of Compressor Packages,” Solar Turbomachinery Technology Seminar, Paper No. 98.
Schmitt, W., and Thomas, V., 1995, “Comparison of Test Measurements Taken on a Pipeline Compressor/Gas Turbine Unit in the Workshop and at Site,” ASME Paper No. 95-GT-125.
Meier, R.H. and Rhea, C.S., 1982, “Centrifugal Compressor Testing Experience and Practice,” ASME Paper No. 82-GT-320.
McRoberts, I.W., 1984, “Performance Trials of Two Centrifugal Compressor Trains on an Offshore Platform,” IMechE C48/84.
Klein, J.M., and Draughton, P.A., 1991, “Field Performance Testing of an Uprated Gas Reinjection Compressor/Turbine Train,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-48.
Doeblin, E.O., 1966, Measurement Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Brun, K., 1996, “Analysis of the Automotive Torque Converter Internal Flow Field,” Ph.d. dissertation, University of Virginia.
Scarborough, J.B., 1955, Numerical Mathematical Analysis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Beinecke, D., and Luedtke, K., 1983, “Die Auslegung von Turboverdichtern unter Berucksichtigung des Realen Gasverhaltens,” VDI Berichte Number 487, pp. 271–279.
Cleveland, A., 1982, “Performance Testing of Gas Turbine Compressor Sets,” ASME Paper No. 82-GT-199.
Aust, N., 1988, “Ein Verfahren zur Digitalen Simulation Instationarer Vorgange in Verdichteranlagen,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of the Federal Armed Forces, Hamburg, Germany.
Boelcs, A., and Suter, P., 1986, “Transsonische Turbomaschinen,” G. Braun, Karlsruhe, Germany.
, “
Determining Gas Meter Accuracy
Mech. Eng. (Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.)
, No.
, pp.
You do not currently have access to this content.