Analytical models are formulated for evaluating the fluid mechanics of membrane-coated, dead-end ceramic filters. The models are applicable to forward flow as in the filtration mode and reverse flow as in the back-pulse cleaning mode. General criteria are derived to size the filter passages from considerations of Darcy pressure drop, friction pressure drop, and the dynamic head. These criteria together with Reynolds numbers are shown to provide measures of nonuniformities in face velocity and pressure that develop in the filter passages for atmospheric and high-pressure applications. A methodology is presented for optimizing the venturi geometry from the standpoint of minimizing pulse gas usage and controlling the thermal load imposed on the filter assembly.

Goldsmith, R. L., and Abrams, R. F., “Ceramic Filter for Fine Particle Control,” Ninth Annual Coal Preparation, Utilization, and Environmental Control Contractors Conference Proc., Pittsburgh, PA, July 1993, pp. 539–546.
Pitt, R. U., and Leitch, A. J., “A Simple Method to Predict the Operation of Flue Gas Filter Pulse Cleaning Systems,” Proc. 1991 International Conference (ASME) on Fluidized Bed Combustion, Vol. 3, Apr. 1991, pp. 1267–1281.
Laux, S., Giernoth, B., Bulk, H., and Renz, U., “Aspects of Pulse Jet Cleaning of Ceramic Filter Elements,” Gas Cleaning at High Temperatures, Blackie Academic & Professional, Glasgow, UK, 1993, pp. 203–224.
L. A.
, and
A. E.
, “
Optimum Design of Ejectors Using Digital Computers
Chemical Engineering Progress Symposium Series
, Vol.
, No.
, pp.
Ahluwalia, R. K., Geyer, H. K., Im, K. H., Zhu, C., Shelleman, D., and Tressler, R., “Assessment of Ceramic Membrane Systems,” Proc. Advanced Coal-Fired Power Systems Review Meeting, Morgantown, WV, Mar. 1995.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.