Factorial design, a statistical method widely used for experiments, and its application to CFD are discussed. The aim is to propose a systematic, objective, and quantitative method for engineers to design a set of simulations in order to evaluate main and joint effects of input parameters on the numerical solution. The input parameters may be experimental uncertainty on boundary conditions, unknown boundary conditions, grid, differencing schemes, and turbulence models. The complex flow of the Turbine-99 test case, a hydropower draft tube flow, is used to illustrate the method, where four factors are chosen to perform a 24 factorial design. The radial velocity at the inlet (not measured) is shown to have an important influence on the pressure recovery (7%) and the energy loss factor (49%).

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
computational fluid dynamics, statistical analysis, turbulence, pipe flow, flow simulation
Topics:
Boundary-value problems, Computational fluid dynamics, Design, Flow (Dynamics), Turbines, Turbulence, Simulation, Errors, Pressure, Workshops (Work spaces), Energy dissipation
1.
Hirsh
,
C.
,
2001
, “
The QNET-CFD Project
,”
QNET-CFD Network Newsletter
,
1
, January, pp.
4
–
5
.
2.
Hutton, A. G., and Casey, M. V., 2001, “Quality and Trust in Industrial CFD—A European Initiative,” 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, Jan. 8–11.
3.
Casey, M., and Wintergerste, T., eds., 2000, Best Practice Guidelines, ERCOFTAC Special Interest Group on Quality and Trust in industrial CFD.
4.
Bergstro¨m
,
J.
, and
Gebart
,
B. R.
,
1999
, “
Estimation of the Numerical Accuarcy for the Flow Field in a Draft Tube
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow
,
9
, pp.
472
–
486
.
5.
Iaccarino, G., 2000, “Prediction of the Turbulent Flow in a Diffuser With Commercial CFD Codes,” Center for Turbulence Research, Annual Research Briefs, pp. 271–278.
6.
Box, E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S., 1978, Statistics for Experimenters, Wiley, New York.
7.
Gebart, B. R., Gustavsson, L. H., and Karlsson, R. I., 1999, Proceedings of Turbine-99 Workshop on Draft Tube Flow, Porjus, Sweden, June 20–23.
8.
Karlsson, R. I., and Gustavsson, L. H., 2001, The Second ERCOFTAC Workshop on Draft Tube Flow, A¨lvekarleby, Sweden, June 18–20, published at http://www.luth.se/depts/mt/strl/turbine99/.
9.
Dahlba¨ck, N., 1996, “Redesign of Sharp Heel Draft Tube—Results From Tests in Model and Prototype,” Proc. of the XVIIIth IAHR Symp. on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Vol. 2, pp. 985–993.
10.
Roberson, J. A., and Crowe, C. T., 1997, Engineering Fluid Mechanics, Wiley, New York, p. 368.
11.
White, F. M., 1991, Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 426–428.
12.
AEA Technology, “CFX4.4 Solver,” Fluid Dynamics Services, Building 8.19, Harwell Laboratory, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
13.
Apsley
,
D. D.
, and
Leschziner
,
M. A.
,
1999
, “
Advanced Turbulence Modelling of Separated Flow in a Difffuser
,”
Flow, Turbul. Combust.
,
63
, pp.
81
–
112
.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.