Space restrictions prevent surgeons to directly interact with the patient during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided procedures. One practical solution would be to develop a robotic system that can act as an interface between surgeon and patient during those interventions. The proposed system consists of a commercial PHANTOM device (product of The Sensable Technologies) as the master robot and an MRI-compatible patient-mounted parallel platform (that we name ROBOCATHETER) designed to serve as the slave mechanism inside the scanner bore. As the main contribution of this paper, a linear parameter varying (LPV) gain-scheduling controller is designed and implemented to obtain the desired performance of the slave robot in tracking set points and reference trajectories. To do so, a reduced-order dynamic model of the robot based on the Lagrange method is derived to capture the nonlinear dynamics of the platform. The model is then used for the design of an output-feedback LPV controller to command the robot to position the catheter in any desired states. During the course of control, appropriate selection of scheduling parameters not only helps to compensate for the nonlinearities of the system dynamics but also leads to a set of decoupled models for the system, where each degree-of-freedom (DOF) could be treated separately. The performance of the controller is compared with a variable-gain proportional-derivative-integral (PID) controller. Experimental results show that the proposed control scheme has significant advantages in terms of set point tracking and actuator saturation over the baseline PID controller.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2015
Technical Briefs
Control of a Cable-Driven Platform in a Master–Slave Robotic System: Linear Parameter Varying Approach
Amirhossein Salimi,
Amirhossein Salimi
1
Mem. ASME
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: asalimi@uh.edu
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: asalimi@uh.edu
1Corresponding author.
Search for other works by this author on:
Amin Ramezanifar,
Amin Ramezanifar
Mem. ASME
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: aramezanifar@uh.edu
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: aramezanifar@uh.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Karolos M. Grigoriadis
Karolos M. Grigoriadis
Professor
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: karolos@uh.edu
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: karolos@uh.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Amirhossein Salimi
Mem. ASME
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: asalimi@uh.edu
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: asalimi@uh.edu
Amin Ramezanifar
Mem. ASME
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: aramezanifar@uh.edu
Dynamic System Control Laboratory,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: aramezanifar@uh.edu
Karolos M. Grigoriadis
Professor
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
e-mail: karolos@uh.edu
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Houston
,Houston, TX 77004
e-mail: karolos@uh.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received January 10, 2014; final manuscript received April 5, 2015; published online June 2, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Evangelos Papadopoulos.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Sep 2015, 137(9): 094502 (6 pages)
Published Online: September 1, 2015
Article history
Received:
January 10, 2014
Revision Received:
April 5, 2015
Online:
June 2, 2015
Citation
Salimi, A., Ramezanifar, A., and Grigoriadis, K. M. (September 1, 2015). "Control of a Cable-Driven Platform in a Master–Slave Robotic System: Linear Parameter Varying Approach." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. September 2015; 137(9): 094502. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030389
Download citation file:
146
Views
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Regret Analysis of Shrinking Horizon Model Predictive Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Control-Oriented Modeling of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Affected by Redox Cycling Using a Novel Deep Learning Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Robust Control of Exo-Abs, a Wearable Platform for Ubiquitous Respiratory Assistance
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Resilient Self-Triggered Model Predictive Control of Cyber-Physical Systems Under Two-Channel False Data Injection Attacks
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March 2025)
Related Articles
Nonlinear Robust Output Stabilization for Mechanical Systems Based on Luenberger-Like Controller/Observer
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (August,2017)
Dynamic Workspace and Control of Planar Active Tensegritylike Structures
J. Mech. Des (December,2008)
Global Output Feedback Finite-Time Regulation of Robot Manipulators Under Actuator Constraints
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (June,2017)
Sampled-Data Stabilization of a Class of Nonlinear Systems With Application in Robotics
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (March,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
QP Based Encoder Feedback Control
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Time-Varying Coefficient Aided MM Scheme
Robot Manipulator Redundancy Resolution
Computing Algorithmic Complexity Using Advance Sampling Technique
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks Volume 18