Research Papers

Characterizing Binder–Powder Interaction in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Via Sessile Drop Goniometry

[+] Author and Article Information
Yun Bai

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: yunbai@vt.edu

Candace Wall

Department of Chemistry,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Hannah Pham

Department of Materials Science and
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Alan Esker

Department of Chemistry,
Macromolecules Innovation Institute,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061

Christopher B. Williams

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Macromolecules Innovation Institute,
Virginia Tech,
Blacksburg, VA 24061
e-mail: cbwill@vt.edu

1Corresponding authors.

Manuscript received April 21, 2018; final manuscript received September 26, 2018; published online October 19, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Qiang Huang.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 141(1), 011005 (Oct 19, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: MANU-18-1264; doi: 10.1115/1.4041624 History: Received April 21, 2018; Revised September 26, 2018

Understanding the binder–powder interaction and primitive formation is critical to advancing the binder jetting Additive Manufacturing process and improving the accuracy, precision, and mechanical properties of the printed parts. In this work, the authors propose an experimental approach based on sessile drop goniometry on a powder substrate to characterize the binder wetting powder process. As a binder drop penetrates into a prepared powder substrate, the dynamic contact angle formed in powder pores is calculated based on the measured binder penetration time, and the binder penetration depth is measured from the binder-powder granule retrieved from the powder substrate. Coupled with models of capillary flow, the technique provides a fundamental understanding of the binder–powder interaction that determines the material compatibility and printing parameters in binder jetting. Enabled by this gained understanding, it was determined that suspending nanoparticles in a binder could increase the capillary-driven penetration depth, which was then reduced by the further increase of the nanoparticle solid loading and resultant binder viscosity.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Vaezi, M. , and Chua, C. K. , 2011, “ Effects of Layer Thickness and Binder Saturation Level Parameters on 3D Printing Process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 53(1–4), pp. 275–284. [CrossRef]
Castilho, M. , Gouveia, B. , Pires, I. , Rodrigues, J. , and Pereira, M. , 2015, “ The Role of Shell/Core Saturation Level on the Accuracy and Mechanical Characteristics of Porous Calcium Phosphate Models Produced by 3Dprinting,” Rapid Prototyp. J., 21(1), pp. 43–55. [CrossRef]
Washburn, E. W. , 1921, “ The Dynamics of Capillary Flow,” Phys. Rev., 17(3), pp. 273–283. [CrossRef]
Denesuk, M. , Smith, G. L. , Zelinski, B. J. J. , Kreidl, N. J. , and Uhlmann, D. R. , 1993, “ Capillary Penetration of Liquid Droplets Into Porous Materials,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 158(1), pp. 114–120. [CrossRef]
Hapgood, K. P. , Litster, J. D. , Biggs, S. R. , and Howes, T. , 2002, “ Drop Penetration Into Porous Powder Beds,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 253(2), pp. 353–366. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Markicevic, B. , D'Onofrio, T. G. , and Navaz, H. K. , 2010, “ On Spread Extent of Sessile Droplet Into Porous Medium: Numerical Solution and Comparisons With Experiments,” Phys. Fluids, 22(1), p. 012103. [CrossRef]
Holman, R. K. , Cima, M. J. , Uhland, S. A. , and Sachs, E. , 2002, “ Spreading and Infiltration of Inkjet-Printed Polymer Solution Droplets on a Porous Substrate,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 249(2), pp. 432–440. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Miyanaji, H. , Zhang, S. , and Yang, L. , 2018, “ A New Physics-Based Model for Equilibrium Saturation Determination in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 124, pp. 1–11. [CrossRef]
Cima, M. J. , Lauder, A. , Khanuja, S. , and Sachs, E. , 1992, “ Microstructural Elements of Components Derived From 3D Printing,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, Aug. 3–5, pp. 220–227.
Utela, B. R. , Storti, D. , Anderson, R. L. , and Ganter, M. , 2010, “ Development Process for Custom Three-Dimensional Printing (3DP) Material Systems,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
Bai, J. G. , Creehan, K. D. , and Kuhn, H. A. , 2007, “ Inkjet Printable Nanosilver Suspensions for Enhanced Sintering Quality in Rapid Manufacturing,” Nanotechnol., 18(18), p. 185701. [CrossRef]
Bai, Y. , and Williams, C. B. , 2018, “ The Effect of Inkjetted Nanoparticles on Metal Part Properties in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing,” Nanotechnol. 29(39), p. 395706. [CrossRef]
Mueller, S. , Llewellin, E. W. , and Mader, H. M. , 2010, “ The Rheology of Suspensions of Solid Particles,” Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci, 466(2116), pp. 1201–1228. [CrossRef]
Stickel, J. J. , and Powell, R. L. , 2005, “ Fluid Mechanics and Rheology of Dense Suspensions,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 37(1), pp. 129–149. [CrossRef]
Coussot, P. , and Ancey, C. , 1999, “ Rheophysical Classification of Concentrated Suspensions and Granular Pastes,” Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 59(4), pp. 4445–4457.
Krieger, I. M. , and Dougherty, T. J. , 1959, “ A Mechanism for Non‐Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres,” Trans. Soc. Rheol., 3(1), pp. 137–152. [CrossRef]
Schramm, L. L. , and Hepler, L. G. , 1994, “ Surface and Interfacial Tensions of Aqueous Dispersions of Charged Colloidal (Clay) Particles,” Can. J. Chem., 72(9), pp. 1915–1920. [CrossRef]
Tanvir, S. , and Qiao, L. , 2012, “ Surface Tension of Nanofluid-Type Fuels Containing Suspended Nanomaterials,” Nanoscale Res. Lett., 7, p. 226.
Murshed, S. M. S. , Tan, S. H. , and Nguyen, N. T. , 2008, “ Temperature Dependence of Interfacial Properties and Viscosity of Nanofluids for Droplet-Based Microfluidics,” J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys., 41, p. 085502.
Chen, R. H. , Phuoc, T. X. , and Martello, D. , 2011, “ Surface Tension of Evaporating Nanofluid Droplets,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54(11–12), pp. 2459–2466. [CrossRef]
Vafaei, S. , Purkayastha, A. , Jain, A. , Ramanath, G. , and Borca-Tasciuc, T. , 2009, “ The Effect of Nanoparticles on the Liquid-Gas Surface Tension of Bi2Te3 Nanofluids,” Nanotechnol., 20(18), p. 185702. [CrossRef]
Dong, L. , and Johnson, D. , 2003, “ Surface Tension of Charge-Stabilized Colloidal Suspensions at the Water-Air Interface,” Langmuir, 19(24), pp. 10205–10209. [CrossRef]
Bredt, J. F. , 1995, “ Binder Stability and Powder-Binder Interaction in Three Dimensional Printing,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/10999
Wolansky, G. , and Marmur, A. , 1998, “ The Actual Contact Angle on a Heterogeneous Rough Surface in Three Dimensions,” Langmuir, 14(18), pp. 5292–5297. [CrossRef]
Alghunaim, A. , Kirdponpattara, S. , and Newby, B. M. Z. , 2016, “ Techniques for Determining Contact Angle and Wettability of Powders,” Powder Technol., 287, pp. 201–215. [CrossRef]
Middleman, S. , 1995, Modeling Axisymmetric Flows: Dynamics of Films, Jets, and Drops, Academic Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rillaerts, E. , and Joos, P. , 1979, “ The Dynamic Contact Angle,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 35(4), pp. 883–887. [CrossRef]
Moseley, W. A. , and Dhir, V. K. , 1996, “ Capillary Pressure-Saturation Relations in Porous Media Including the Effect of Wettability,” J. Hydrol., 178(1–4), pp. 33–53. [CrossRef]
Miyanaji, H. , and Yang, L. , 2016, “ Equilibrium Saturation in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing Processes: Theoretical Model Vs. Experimental Observations,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX, Aug. 7–10, pp. 1945–1959 http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2016/157-Miyanaji.pdf.
Bai, Y. , and Williams, C. B. , 2017, “ Binderless Jetting: Additive Manufacturing of Metal Parts Via Jetting Nanoparticles,” International Solid Freeform Fabrication, Austin, TX, Aug. 7–9, pp. 249–260. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2017/Manuscripts/BinderlessJettingAdditiveManufacturingofMeta.pdf
Bai, Y. , and Williams, C. B. , 2015, “ An Exploration of Binder Jetting of Copper,” Rapid Prototyp. J., 21(2), pp. 177–185. [CrossRef]
Liu, J. , Kuhn, H. , Rynerson, M. , and Morvan, S. , 2004, “ Binder Technology for Large Metal Parts Produced Using Three-Dimensional Printing,” Euro PM2004, pp. 153–159.
Derby, B. , and Reis, N. , 2003, “ Inkjet Printing of Highly Loaded Particulate Suspensions,” MRS Bull., 28(11), pp. 815–818. [CrossRef]
Bai, Y. , Wagner, G. , and Williams, C. B. , 2017, “ Effect of Particle Size Distribution on Powder Packing and Sintering in Binder Jetting Additive Manufacturing of Metals,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 139(8), p. 081019.
Link, K. C. , and Schlünder, E.-U. , 1996, “ A New Method for the Characterisation of the Wettability of Powders,” Chem. Eng. Technol., 19(5), pp. 432–437. [CrossRef]
Hapgood, K. P. , Farber, L. , and Michaels, J. N. , 2009, “ Agglomeration of Hydrophobic Powders Via Solid Spreading Nucleation,” Powder Technol., 188(3), pp. 248–254. [CrossRef]
Casson, K. , and Johnson, D. , 2001, “ Surface-Tension-Driven Flow Due to the Adsorption and Desorption of Colloidal Particles,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 242(2), pp. 279–283.. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Recorded apparent contact angle from initial contact (left) to completed absorption (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Overlapping primitives to form printed parts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Binder jetting of metal manufacturing process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Top view (a) and side view (b) of a powder granule generated from one binder sessile drop penetrating into a powder substrate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Binder–powder interaction and primitive formation process in binder jetting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Static contact angle at solid–liquid–vapor interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Apparent contact of binder spreading on powder bed (θa) versus dynamic wetting contact angle in the powder capillary pores (θd)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Dynamic contact angle and calculated capillary number versus solid loading of nanoparticles for different powders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Particle size distribution of tested powders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Viscosity of polymer binder and nanoparticle–polymer dispersions at different solid loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Fractional viscosity versus nanoparticle volume fraction with a curve fitted model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Inkjet testing of (a) polymer binder, (b) 15 wt %, and (c) 22.5 wt % nanoparticle binder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Measured time-dependent apparent contact angle as the sessile drop of polymer binder (2.61 μL), 7.5% nanoparticle binder (2.14 μL), 15% nanoparticle binder (1.98 μL), and 22.5% nanoparticle binder (1.88 μL) penetrates into the (a) 75 μm, (b) 30 + 5 μm, and (c) 17 μm powder, with a decreasing pore size of 12.2 μm, 2.8 μm, and 2.5 μm respectively

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Penetration time versus solid loading of nanoparticles for different powders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Normalized radial diameter and vertical depth of the binder agglomerated powder generated from the binder penetrating powder goniometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

The equilibrium binder saturation ratio versus nanoparticle solid loading for different powders

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Overlapping of printed primitives (created by inkjetted drop volume, Vinkjet) with a drop spacing of dX and dY



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In