Research Papers

Dynamic Material Response of Aluminum Single Crystal Under Microscale Laser Shock Peening

[+] Author and Article Information
Sinisa Vukelic, Youneng Wang, Jeffrey W. Kysar, Y. Lawrence Yao

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 131(3), 031015 (May 29, 2009) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3106034 History: Received July 22, 2008; Revised January 19, 2009; Published May 29, 2009

The process of laser shock peening induces compressive residual stresses in a material to improve material fatigue life. For micron sized laser beams, the size of the laser-target interaction zone is of the same order of magnitude as the target material grains, and thus the target material must be considered as being anisotropic and inhomogeneous. Single crystals are chosen to study the effects of the anisotropic mechanical properties. It is also of interest to investigate the response of symmetric and asymmetric slip systems with respect to the shocked surface. In the present study, numerical and experimental aspects of laser shock peening on two different crystal surfaces (110) and (11¯4) of aluminum single crystals are studied. Lattice rotations on the top surface and cross section are measured using electron backscatter diffraction, while residual stress is characterized using X-ray microdiffraction. A numerical model has been developed that takes into account anisotropy as well as inertial terms to predict the size and nature of the deformation and residual stresses. Obtained results were compared with the experimental finding for validation purpose.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

FEM simulation of residual stress distribution in the (110) case

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Residual stress measured via X-ray microdiffraction

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Temporal pressure distribution during the loading in the numerical simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Deformation field measured via profilometer and AFM, respectively: (a) orientation (110), and (b) orientation (11¯4)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Lattice rotation contour map on a sample surface; (a) (110) rotation, and (b) (11¯4) rotation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Lattice rotation contour map on the (110) cross section; positive rotation is counterclockwise about the z-axis

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Lattice deformation contour map by FEM: (a) (110) orientation, and (b) (11¯4) orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

(a) Shear strain increment in each slip system in the end of the loading step for (110) orientation: (1) increment in slip system i; (2) increment in slip system iii; (3) increment in slip system ii; and (4) total shear strain increment. (b) Shear strain increment in each slip system in the end of the loading step for (11¯4) orientation: (1) increment in slip system i; (2) increment in slip system iii; (3) increment in slip system ii; (4) total shear strain increment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Plane strain slip systems corresponding to (a) (110) orientation and (b) (11¯4) orientation; effective in-plane slip systems are labeled as i, ii, and iii

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Yield locus for (a) (110) orientation and (b) (11¯4) orientation



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In