Experimental Investigation of the Machinability of Polycarbonate Reinforced With Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes

[+] Author and Article Information
J. Samuel, R. E. DeVor, S. G. Kapoor, K. J. Hsia

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 128(2), 465-473 (Sep 17, 2005) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2137753 History: Received June 10, 2005; Revised September 17, 2005

The machinability of a polycarbonate nanocomposite containing multiwalled carbon nanotubes is investigated and contrasted with its base polymer and with a conventional carbon fiber composite. The material microstructures are characterized using transmission electron and scanning electron microscopy methods. Micro-endmilling experiments are conducted on the three materials. Chip morphology, machined surface characteristics, and the nature of the cutting forces are employed as machinability measures for comparative purposes. Polycarbonate chips are seen to transition from being discontinuous to continuous as the feed-per-tooth (FPT) increases, while, at all FPT values the nanocomposite is seen to form comparatively thicker continuous chips. The nanocomposite and the carbon fiber composite are seen to have the lowest and the highest magnitudes, respectively, for both the surface roughness and cutting forces. Shearing along the nanotube-polymer interface and better thermal conductivity are speculated to be the mechanisms responsible for the observations seen in the nanocomposite.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

TEM image of multiwalled carbon nanotube

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

TEM image of the polycarbonate nanocomposite

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

(a) SEM image of plain polycarbonate microstructure (scale: bar=500nm); (b) SEM image of a polycarbonate nanocomposite microstructure (scale: bar=500nm); (c) SEM image ofa polycarbonate carbon fiber composite microstructure (scale: bar=100μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Characteristic chip morphologies seen at different feed-per-tooth values (scale: bar=100μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Close up of Fig. 5 polycarbonate chip (scale: bar=100μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

(a) Peak-to-valley X force versus FPT; (b) Peak-to-valley Y force versus FPT

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Close up of Fig. 5 carbon fiber composite chip (scale: bar=100μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Plot of average chip thickness versus FPT

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Floor of slot machined in plain PC with FPT =2μm (scale: bar=120μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

CNTs seen at the floor of the slot (the arrow denotes the direction of tool pass) (scale: bar=500nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Fractured carbon fibers at the floor of the slot machined with FPT 1.33μm (scale: bar=50μm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Surface roughness (Ra) measured along the center of the slot

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

(a)Y force at FPT=0.33μm; (b)Y force at FPT=4μm



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In