Research Papers

Audio-Based Tool Condition Monitoring in Milling of the Workpiece Material With the Hardness Variation Using Support Vector Machines and Convolutional Neural Networks

[+] Author and Article Information
Achyuth Kothuru

Rochester Institute of Technology,
One Lomb Memorial Dr,
Rochester, NY 14623
e-mail: axk5592@rit.edu

Sai Prasad Nooka

Rochester Institute of Technology,
One Lomb Memorial Dr,
Rochester, NY 14623
e-mail: nooka.saiprasad@gmail.com

Rui Liu

Rochester Institute of Technology,
One Lomb Memorial Dr,
Rochester, NY 14623
e-mail: rleme@rit.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 7, 2018; final manuscript received July 10, 2018; published online August 3, 2018. Editor: Y. Lawrence Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(11), 111006 (Aug 03, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-18-1416; doi: 10.1115/1.4040874 History: Received June 07, 2018; Revised July 10, 2018

Machining industry has been evolving toward implementation of automation into the processes for higher productivity and efficiency. Although many studies have been conducted in the past to develop intelligent monitoring systems in various application scenarios of machining processes, most of them just focused on cutting tools without considering the influence of the nonuniform hardness of workpiece material. This study develops a compact, reliable, and cost-effective tool condition monitoring (TCM) system to detect the cutting tool wear in machining of the workpiece material with hardness variation. The generated audible sound signals during the machining process are analyzed by state-of-the-art artificial intelligent techniques, support vector machine (SVM) and convolutional neural network (CNN), to predict the tool wear and the hardness variation of the workpiece. A four-level classification model is developed for the system to detect the tool wear condition based on the width of the flank wear land and the hardness variation of the workpiece. This study also involves the comparative analysis between two employed artificial intelligent techniques to evaluate the performance of the model in prediction. The proposed TCM system has shown a high prediction accuracy in detecting the tool wear from the audible sound into the proposed multiclassification wear level in end milling of the nonuniform hardened workpiece.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Teti, R. , Jemielniak, K. , O'Donnell, G. , and Dornfeld, D. , 2010, “ Advanced Monitoring of Machining Operations,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 59(2), pp. 717–739. [CrossRef]
Axinte, D. , and Gindy, N. , 2004, “ Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Spindle Power Signal for Tool Condition Monitoring in Machining Processes,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 42(13), pp. 2679–2691. [CrossRef]
Dutta, S. , Pal, S. K. , and Sen, R. , 2016, “ Tool Condition Monitoring in Turning by Applying Machine Vision,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 138(5), p. 051008. [CrossRef]
Axinte, D. A. , 2006, “ Approach Into the Use of Probabilistic Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Tool Malfunctions in Broaching,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 46(12–13), pp. 1445–1448. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. H. , Hong, G. S. , Wong, Y. S. , and Zhu, K. P. , 2007, “ Sensor Fusion for Online Tool Condition Monitoring in Milling,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 45(21), pp. 5095–5116. [CrossRef]
Lu, M.-C. , and Kannatey-Asibu, E. , 2002, “ Analysis of Sound Signal Generation Due to Flank Wear in Turning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 124(4), p. 799. [CrossRef]
Kuljanic, E. , Sortino, M. , and Totis, G. , 2006, “ Application of Wavelet Transform of AE Signal for Tool Condition Monitoring in Face Milling,” 39th CIRP Int. Sem. on Manuf. Systems, Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 39–44.
Kamarthi, S. V. , Kumara, S. R. T. , and Cohen, P. H. , 2000, “ Flank Wear Estimation in Turning Through Wavelet Representation of Acoustic Emission Signals,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 122(1), pp. 12–19. [CrossRef]
Obikawa, T. , and Shinozuka, J. , 2004, “ Monitoring of Flank Wear of Coated Tools in High Speed Machining With a Neural Network ART2,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 44(12–13), pp. 1311–1318. [CrossRef]
Silva, R. G. , Reuben, R. L. , Baker, K. J. , and Wilcox, S. J. , 1998, “ Tool Wear Monitoring of Turning Operations by Neural Network and Expert System Classification of a Feature Set Generated From Multiple Sensors,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 12(2), pp. 319–332. [CrossRef]
Yao, Y. , Fang, X. D. , and Arndt, G. , 1990, “ Comprehensive Tool Wear Estimation in Finish-Machining Via Multivariate Time-Series Analysis of 3-D Cutting Forces,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 39(1), pp. 57–60. [CrossRef]
Scheffer, C. , Kratz, H. , Heyns, P. S. , and Klocke, F. , 2003, “ Development of a Tool Wear-Monitoring System for Hard Turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 43(10), pp. 973–985. [CrossRef]
Dinakaran, D. , Sampathkumar, S. , and Sivashanmugam, N. , 2009, “ An Experimental Investigation on Monitoring of Crater Wear in Turning Using Ultrasonic Technique,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 49(15), pp. 1234–37. [CrossRef]
Shahabi, H. H. , and Ratnam, M. M. , 2010, “ In-Cycle Detection of Built-Up Edge (BUE) From 2-D Images of Cutting Tools Using Machine Vision,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 46(9–12), pp. 1179–1189. [CrossRef]
Sukvittayawong, S. , and Inasaki, I. , 1994, “ Detection of Built-Up Edge in Turning Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 34(6), pp. 829–840. [CrossRef]
Fang, N. , Pai, P. S. , and Edwards, N. , 2010, “ Prediction of Built-Up Edge Formation in Machining With round Edge and Sharp Tools Using a Neural Network Approach,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 23(11), pp. 1002–1014. [CrossRef]
Boothroyd, G. , 1988, Fundamentals of Metal Machining and Machine Tools, 3rd ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Moriwaki, T. , and Tobito, M. , 1990, “ A New Approach to Automatic Detection of Life of Coated Tool Based on Acoustic Emission Measurement,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 112(3), p. 212.
Al-khalid, H. K. , Alaskari, A. M. , and Oraby, S. E. , 2011, “ Hardness Variations as Affected by Bar Diameter of AISI 4140 Steel,” Int. J. Mech. Mechatronics Eng., 5(3), pp. 284–290. https://waset.org/publications/9476/hardness-variations-as-affected-by-bar-diameter-of-aisi-4140-steel
Al-Khalid, H. , Alaskari, A. , and Oraby, S. , 2012, “ Statistical and Graphical Assessment of Circumferential and Radial Hardness Variation of AISI 4140, AISI 1020 and AA 6082 Aluminum Alloy,” Materials, 5(1), pp. 12–26.
Teti, R. , and La Commare, U. , 1991, “ Cutting Process Monitoring of Aeronautical Aluminum Alloys Through AE Techniques,” International Conference on Innovation Metal Cutting Processes & Materials, pp. 2–4.
Teti, R. , and La Commare, U. , 1992, “ Cutting Conditions and Work Material State Identification Through Acoustic Emission Methods,” CIRP Ann.Manuf. Technol., 41(1), pp. 89–92. [CrossRef]
Teti, R. , and Buonadonna, P. , 1994, “ Work Material State Monitoring Using Spectral Features,” Tenth International Conference on CAPE, pp. 51–63.
Ghasempoor, A. , Jeswiet, J. , and Moore, T. N. , 1999, “ Real Time Implementation of On-Line Tool Condition Monitoring in Turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 39(12), pp. 1883–1902. [CrossRef]
Abellan-Nebot, J. V. , and Subirón, F. R. , 2010, “ A Review of Machining Monitoring Systems Based on Artificial Intelligence Process Models,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 47(1–4), pp. 237–257. [CrossRef]
Siddhpura, A. , and Paurobally, R. , 2013, “ A Review of Flank Wear Prediction Methods for Tool Condition Monitoring in a Turning Process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 65(1–4), pp. 371–393. [CrossRef]
Roth, J. T. , Djurdjanovic, D. , Yang, X. , Mears, L. , and Kurfess, T. , 2010, “ Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: Tool Condition Monitoring,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132(4), p. 041015. [CrossRef]
Rafezi, H. , Behzad, M. , and Akbari, J. , 2012, “ Time Domain and Frequency Spectrum Analysis of Sound Signal for Drill Wear Detection,” Int. J. Comput. Electr. Eng., 4(5), pp. 722–725. [CrossRef]
Raja, J. E. , Lim, W. S. , and Venkataseshaiah, C. , 2012, “ Emitted Sound Analysis for Tool Flank Wear Monitoring using Hilbert Huang Transform,” Int. J. Comput. Electr. Eng., 4(2), pp. 110–114. http://www.ijcee.org/papers/460-E1224.pdf
Botsaris, P. N. , and Tsanakas, J. A. , 2008, “ State of the Art in Methods Applied to Tool Condition Monitoring (TCM) in Unmanned Machining Operations,” International Conference of COMADEM, Prague, Czech Republic, Feb. 25–Mar. 13, pp. 73–87.
Shi, D. , and Gindy, N. N. , 2007, “ Tool Wear Predictive Model Based on Least Squares Support Vector Machines,” Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 21(4), pp. 1799–1814. [CrossRef]
Zhang, B. , Katinas, C. , and Shin, Y. C. , 2018, “ Robust Tool Wear Monitoring Using Systematic Feature Selection in Turning Processes With Consideration of Uncertainties,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 140(8), pp. 1–12.
Lela, B. , Bajić, D. , and Jozić, S. , 2009, “ Regression Analysis, Support Vector Machines, and Bayesian Neural Network Approaches to Modeling Surface Roughness in Face Milling,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 42(11–12), pp. 1082–1088. [CrossRef]
Kothuru, A. , Nooka, S. P. , and Liu, R. , 2017, “ Cutting Process Monitoring System Using Audible Sound Signals and Machine Learning Techniques: An Application to End Milling,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2017-3069.
Sun, J. , Rahman, M. , Wong, Y. S. , and Hong, G. S. , 2004, “ Multiclassification of Tool Wear With Support Vector Machine by Manufacturing Loss Consideration,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 44(11), pp. 1179–1187. [CrossRef]
LeCun, Y. , Bengio, Y. , and Hinton, G. , 2015, “ Deep Learning,” Nature, 521, p. 436.
Nooka, S. P. , 2016, Fusion of Mini-Deep Nets, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY.
Girshick, R. , Donahue, T. , Darrell, T. , and Malik, J. , “ Rich Feature Hierarchies for Accurate Object detection and Smantic Sgmentation,” e-print arXiv:1311.2524.
Long, J. , Shelhamer, E. , and Darrell, T. , 2015, “ Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentation,” IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, June 7–12, pp. 3431–3440.
Ess, A. , Mueller, T. , Grabner, H. , and van Gool, L. , 2009, “ Segmentation-Based Urban Traffic Scene Understanding,” British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC 2009), London, Sept. 7–10, pp. 84.1–84.11.
Dolinšek, S. , and Kopač, J. , 2006, “ Mechanism and Types of Tool Wear; Particularities in Advanced Cutting Materials,” J. Achiev. Mater., 19(1), pp. 11–18. http://jamme.acmsse.h2.pl/papers_vol19_1/1285.pdf
Rehorn, A. G. , Jiang, J. , and Orban, P. E. , 2005, “ State-of-the-Art Methods and Results in Tool Condition Monitoring: A Review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 26(7–8), pp. 693–710. [CrossRef]
Refaeilzadeh, P. , Tang, L. , and Liu, H. , 2009, “ Cross-Validation,” Encyclopedia of Database Systems, Springer, Boston, MA, pp. 532–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed]
Schalkoff, R. J. , 1997, Artificial Neural Networks, Vol. 1, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Karpathy, A. , Toderici, G. , Shetty, S. , Leung, T. , Sukthankar, R. , and Fei-Fei, L. , 2014, “ Large-Scale Video Classification With Convolutional Neural Networks,” IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Columbus, OH, June 23–28, pp. 1725–1732.
Goodfellow, I. J. , Warde-Farley, D. , Mirza, M. , Courville, A. , and Bengio, Y. , 2013, “ Maxout Networks,” e-print arXiv:1302.4389.
Nair, V. , and Hinton, G. E. , 2010, “ Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines,” 27th International Conference on Machine Learning, Haifa, Israel, June 21–24, pp. 807–814.
Srivastava, N. , Hinton, G. , Krizhevsky, A. , Sutskever, I. , and Salakhutdinov, R. , 2014, “ Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks From Overfitting,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15, pp. 1929–1958.
Mikolov, T. , Karafiat, M. , Burget, L. , Cernocky, J. , and Khudanpur, S. , 2015, “ Recurrent Neural Network Based Language Model,” Eleventh Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.
Kingma, D. P. , and Ba, J. L. , 2015, “ Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), San Diego, CA, May 7–9. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.6980.pdf
Ripley, B. D. , 2007, Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Types of flank wear: VB 1—uniform flank wear; VB 2—nonuniform flank wear; and VB 3—localized flank wear (ISO 8688)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cutting zone of end-milling tool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Hardness variation of workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Training data size variation of SVM and CNN for tool wear prediction analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Variable window length analysis for SVM: (a) tool wear prediction analysis and (b) workpiece hardness variation prediction analysis

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

CNN architecture flow-chart

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Left illustrates a regular three-layer multilayer perceptron and right illustrates a CNN arrangement of neurons

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic diagram of experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental setup of data acquisition

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Training data size variation of SVM and CNN for workpiece hardness variation prediction analysis



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In