Research Papers

Fundamental Machining Characteristics of Ultrasonic-Assisted Electrochemical Grinding of Ti–6Al–4V

[+] Author and Article Information
Sisi Li

Department of Machine Intelligence and
Systems Engineering,
Akita Prefectural University,
Yurihonjo, Akita 015-0055, Japan;
Department of Mechanical and
Energy Engineering,
Southern University of Science
and Technology,
Shenzhen 518055, China

Yongbo Wu

Department of Mechanical and
Energy Engineering,
Southern University of Science and Technology,
Shenzhen 518055, China;
Department of Machine Intelligence and
Systems Engineering,
Akita Prefectural University,
Yurihonjo, Akita 015-0055, Japan
e-mail: wuyb@sustc.edu.cn

Mitsuyoshi Nomura, Tatsuya Fujii

Department of Machine Intelligence and
Systems Engineering,
Akita Prefectural University,
Yurihonjo, Akita 015-0055, Japan

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received March 23, 2017; final manuscript received March 27, 2018; published online May 11, 2018. Editor: Y. Lawrence Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(7), 071009 (May 11, 2018) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1160; doi: 10.1115/1.4039855 History: Received March 23, 2017; Revised March 27, 2018

The Ti–6Al–4V is a widely used alloy in the aerospace industry. In order to improve the grindability of Ti–6Al–4V, a hybrid material removal process is proposed in this study. This process is a combination of ultrasonic assisted grinding (UAG) and electrochemical grinding (ECG), hereafter called ultrasonic assisted electrochemical grinding (UAECG). For confirming the feasibility of the proposed technique, an experimental setup was constructed and the fundamental machining characteristics of UAECG in the grinding of Ti–6Al–4V were experimentally investigated. The results obtained from the investigation can be summarized as follows: (1) the normal and tangential forces in UAECG were decreased approximately 57% and 56%, respectively, comparing with conventional grinding (CG). (2) The work-surface roughness Ra both in ECG and UAECG was negative correlation to the electrolytic voltage, UI, and the surface damage; (3) the wheel radius wear in UAECG was considerably smaller than that in ECG when UI < 10 V. The chip adhesion and the grain fracture mainly affected the working lives of the wheels in ECG and UAECG, whereas the wheel wear in CG was predominantly attributed to the grain drop out; (4) a titanium dioxide (TiO2) layer, which had a 78 nm thickness was achieved on the work surface in the condition of UI = 20 V, leading that the Vickers microhardness of work surface in ultrasonic assisted electrochemical was lower than that in CG by 15%.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Mia, M. , and Dhar, N. R. , 2018, “ Effects of Duplex Jets High-Pressure Coolant on Machining Temperature and Machinability of Ti–6Al–4V Superalloy,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 252, pp. 688–696. [CrossRef]
Hong, S. Y. , Markus, I. , and Jeong, W.-C. , 2001, “ New Cooling Approach and Tool Life Improvement in Cryogenic Machining of Titanium Alloy Ti–6Al–4V,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 41, pp. 2245–2260. [CrossRef]
Ezugwu, E. O. , and Wang, Z. M. , 1997, “ Titanium Alloys and Their Machinability—A Review,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 68(3), pp. 262–273. [CrossRef]
Rowe, W. B. , 2017, “ Temperatures in Grinding—A Review,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 139(12), p. 121001. [CrossRef]
Thakur, A. , and Gangopadhyay, S. , 2016, “ State-of-the-Art in Surface Integrity in Machining of Nickel-Based Super Alloys,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 100, pp. 25–54. [CrossRef]
Ezugwu, E. O. , 2005, “ Key Improvements in the Machining of Difficult-to-Cut Aerospace Superalloys,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 45(12–13), pp. 1353–1367. [CrossRef]
Setti, D. , Sinha, M. K. , Ghosh, S. , and Rao, P. V. , 2015, “ Performance Evaluation of Ti–6Al–4V Grinding Using Chip Formation and Coefficient of Friction Under the Influence of Nanofluids,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 88, pp. 237–248. [CrossRef]
Sun, S. , Brandt, M. , and Dargusch, M. S. , 2010, “ Machining Ti–6Al–4V Alloy With Cryogenic Compressed Air Cooling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 50(11), pp. 933–942. [CrossRef]
Bermingham, M. J. , Palanisamy, S. , Kent, D. , and Dargusch, M. S. , 2012, “ A Comparison of Cryogenic and High Pressure Emulsion Cooling Technologies on Tool Life and Chip Morphology in Ti–6Al–4V Cutting,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 212(4), pp. 752–765. [CrossRef]
Palanisamy, S. , McDonald, S. D. , and Dargusch, M. S. , 2009, “ Effects of Coolant Pressure on Chip Formation While Turning Ti6Al4V Alloy,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 49(9), pp. 739–743. [CrossRef]
Dandekar, C. R. , Shin, Y. C. , and Barnes, J. , 2010, “ Machinability Improvement of Titanium Alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) Via LAM and Hybrid Machining,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 50(2), pp. 174–182. [CrossRef]
Ilhan, R. E. , Sathyanaryanan, G. , Storer, R. H. , and Liao, T. W. , 1992, “ Off-Line Multiresponse Optimization of Electrochemical Surface Grinding by a Multi-Objective Programming Method,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 32(3), pp. 435–451. [CrossRef]
Nirala, C. K. , Unune, D. R. , and Sankhla, H. K. , 2017, “ Virtual Signal-Based Pulse Discrimination in Micro-Electro-Discharge Machining,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 139(9), p. 094501. [CrossRef]
Tehrani, A. F. , and Atkinson, J. , 2000, “ Overcut in Pulsed Electrochemical Grinding,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 214(4), pp. 259–268. [CrossRef]
Zaborski, S. , Łupak, M. , and Poroś, D. , 2004, “ Wear of Cathode in Abrasive Electrochemical Grinding of Hardly Machined Materials,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 149(1–3), pp. 414–418. [CrossRef]
Sapre, P. , Mall, A. , and Joshi, S. S. , 2013, “ Analysis of Electrolytic Flow Effects in Micro-Electrochemical Grinding,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135(1), p. 011012.
Rajurkar, K. P. , Zhu, D. , McGeough, J. A. , Kozak, J. , and De Silva, A. , 1999, “ New Developments in Electro-Chemical Machining,” CIRP Ann.—Manuf. Technol., 48(2), pp. 567–578. [CrossRef]
Roy, S. , Bhattacharyya, A. , and Banerjee, S. , 2007, “ Analysis of Effect of Voltage on Surface Texture in Electrochemical Grinding by Autocorrelation Function,” Tribol. Int., 40(9), pp. 1387–1392. [CrossRef]
Pei, Z. J. , and Ferreira, P. M. , 1998, “ Modeling of Ductile-Mode Material Removal in Rotary Ultrasonic Machining,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 38(10–11), pp. 1399–1418. [CrossRef]
Nik, M. G. , Movahhedy, M. R. , and Akbari, J. , 2012, “ Ultrasonic-Assisted Grinding of Ti6Al4V Alloy,” Procedia CIRP, 1, pp. 353–358. [CrossRef]
Pujana, J. , Rivero, A. , Celaya, A. , and de Lacalle, L. N. L. , 2009, “ Analysis of Ultrasonic-Assisted Drilling of Ti6Al4V,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 49(6), pp. 500–507. [CrossRef]
Qin, N. , Pei, Z. J. , Treadwell, C. , and Guo, D. M. , 2009, “ Physics-Based Predictive Cutting Force Model in Ultrasonic-Vibration-Assisted Grinding for Titanium Drilling,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 131(4), p. 041011.
Xiao, X. , Zheng, K. , Liao, W. , and Meng, H. , 2016, “ Study on Cutting Force Model in Ultrasonic Vibration Assisted Side Grinding of Zirconia Ceramics,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 104, pp. 58–67. [CrossRef]
Zheng, J. X. , and Xu, J. W. , 2006, “ Experimental Research on the Ground Surface Quality of Creep Feed Ultrasonic Grinding Ceramics (Al2O3),” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 19(4), pp. 359–365. [CrossRef]
Mult, H. , Spur, G. , and Holl, S. , 1996, “ Ultrasonic Assisted Grinding of Ceramics,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 62(4), pp. 287–293. [CrossRef]
Klecka, M. , and Subhash, G. , 2008, “ Grain Size Dependence of Scratch-Induced Damage in Alumina Ceramics,” Wear, 265(5–6), pp. 612–619. [CrossRef]
Farhadi, A. , Abdullah, A. , Zarkoob, J. , and Pak, A. , 2010, “ Analytical and Numerical Simulation of Ultrasonic Assisted Grinding,” ASME Paper No. ESDA2010-25049.
Lee, T. , and Chan, C. , 1997, “ Mechanism of the Ultrasonic Machining of Ceramic Composites,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 71(2), pp. 195–201. [CrossRef]
Zhang, X. , Huang, R. , Liu, K. , Kumar, A. S. , and Deng, H. , 2018, “ Suppression of Diamond Tool Wear in Machining of Tungsten Carbide by Combining Ultrasonic Vibration and Electrochemical Processing,” Ceram. Int., 44(4), pp. 4142–4153. [CrossRef]
Ruszaj, A. , Skoczypiec, S. , and Wyszyński, D. , 2017, “ Recent Developments in Abrasive Hybrid Manufacturing Processes,” Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev., 8(2), pp. 81–90.
Monteiro, S. N. , Skury, A. L. D. , de Azevedo, M. G. , and Bobrovnitchii, G. S. , 2013, “ Cubic Boron Nitride Competing With Diamond as a Superhard Engineering Material—An Overview,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., 2(1), pp. 68–74. [CrossRef]
Dai, J. , Ding, W. , Zhang, L. , Xu, J. , and Su, H. , 2015, “ Understanding the Effects of Grinding Speed and Undeformed Chip Thickness on the Chip Formation in High-Speed Grinding,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 81(5–8), pp. 995–1005. [CrossRef]
Marinescu, I. D. , Hitchiner, M. P. , Uhlmann, E. , Rowe, W. B. , and Inasak, I. , 2006, Handbook of Machining With Grinding Wheels, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p. 632. [CrossRef]
Tao, Z. , Yaoyao, S. , Laakso, S. , and Jinming, Z. , 2017, “ Investigation of the Effect of Grinding Parameters on Surface Quality in Grinding of TC4 Titanium Alloy,” Procedia Manuf., 11, pp. 2131–2138. [CrossRef]
Arunachalam, R. M. , Mannan, M. A. , and Spowage, A. C. , 2004, “ Surface Integrity When Machining Age Hardened Inconel 718 With Coated Carbide Cutting Tools,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 44(14), pp. 1481–1491. [CrossRef]
Wu, Y. B. , Nomura, M. , Feng, Z. J. , and Kato, M. , 2004, “ Modeling of Grinding Force in Constant-Depth-of-Cut Ultrasonically Assisted Grinding,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 471–472, pp. 101–107. [CrossRef]
Zwilling, V. , Aucouturier, M. , and Darque-Ceretti, E. , 1999, “ Anodic Oxidation of Titanium and TA6V Alloy in Chromic Media. An Electrochemical Approach,” Electrochim. Acta, 45, pp. 921–930. [CrossRef]
Jamshidi, H. , and Nategh, M. J. , 2013, “ Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of the Frictional Behavior of the Tool–Chip Interface in Ultrasonic-Vibration Assisted Turning,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 65, pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Alawadhi, E. M. , 2013, “ Numerical Simulation of Fluid Flow Past an Oscillating Triangular Cylinder in a Channel,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 135(4), p. 041202.
Shaw, M. C. , 1996, Principles of Abrasive Processing, Bookcraft (Bath) Ltd., Midsomer Norton, Great Britain.
Druzhinin, O. A. , 1994, “ Concentration Waves and Flow Modification in a Particle-Laden Circular Vortex,” Phys. Fluids, 6(10), pp. 3276–3284. [CrossRef]
Bellanger, G. , and Rameau, J. J. , 2015, “ Tritium Recovery From Tritiated Water by Electrolysis,” Fusion Sci. Technol., 36(3), pp. 296–308. [CrossRef]
Uhlmann, E. , and Spur, G. , 1998, “ Surface Formation in Creep Feed Grinding of Advanced Ceramics With and Without Ultrasonic Assistance,” CIRP Annals, 47(1), pp. 249–252.
Singh, K. K. , Kartik, V. , and Singh, R. , 2015, “ Modeling Dynamic Stability in High-Speed Micromilling of Ti–6Al–4V Via Velocity and Chip Load Dependent Cutting Coefficients,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 96, pp. 56–66. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of the principle of UAECG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The successive cutting point spacing in grinding direction and grains protrusion height: (a) 2D SEM image of a typical area on the wheel working surface, (b) 3D SEM image of a typical grain, (c) distribution percentage of a, and (d) distribution percentage of h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relationships between grinding forces and process parameters: (a) variation of grinding forces during grinding and (b) grinding force versus process parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Surface roughness rate versus input voltage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

SEM images of ground work surface: (a) in CG, (b) in UAECG with UI = 20 V, and (c) illustration of the cross section of plastic deformation and crack in grinding direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Grinding wheel wear versus input voltage with and without ultrasonic

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Type of grain damage in CG (UI = 0 V without ultrasonic)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Number percentages of damaged grains in CG, ECG, and UAECG

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Schematic diagram of FIB specimen preparation and SEM observation: (a) surface coating, (b)FIB machining, and (c) 45 deg tilt

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The SEM image of workpiece cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Grain motion trajectory



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In