Technical Brief

Process–Property Relationships for Fused Filament Fabrication on Preexisting Polymer Substrates

[+] Author and Article Information
Harry A. Pierson

Department of Industrial Engineering,
4207 Bell Engineering Center,
Fayetteville, AR 72701
e-mail: hapierso@uark.edu

Bharat Chivukula

Department of Industrial Engineering,
4207 Bell Engineering Center,
Fayetteville, AR 72701
e-mail: bchivuk@email.uark.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received November 5, 2017; final manuscript received March 18, 2018; published online May 21, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Donggang Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(8), 084501 (May 21, 2018) (6 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1688; doi: 10.1115/1.4039766 History: Received November 05, 2017; Revised March 18, 2018

Recent advances in fused filament fabrication (FFF), such as five-axis printing, patching existing parts, and certain hybrid manufacturing processes, involve printing atop a previously manufactured polymer substrate. The success of these technologies depends upon the bond strength between the substrate and the newly added geometry. ANOVA and response surface methods were used to determine the effect of three process parameters on bond tensile strength: surface roughness, layer thickness, and raster angle. Experimental results indicate that the process–property relationships are not identical to those found in single, continuous FFF operations, and that the physical bonding mechanisms may also be different. Bond strength was found to be highly sensitive to surface roughness and layer thickness, and distinct optimal parameter settings exist. These results represent a first step toward understanding bond strength in such circumstances, allowing manufacturers to intelligently select process parameters for the production of both the substrate and the secondary geometry.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Oropallo, W. , and Piegl, L. A. , 2016, “Ten Challenges in 3D Printing,” Eng. Comput., 32(1), pp. 135–148. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y. , Leu, M. C. , and Mazumder, J. , 2015, “Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(1), p. 014001. [CrossRef]
Song, X. , Pan, Y. , and Chen, Y. , 2015, “Development of a Low-Cost Parallel Kinematic Machine for Multidirectional Additive Manufacturing,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(2), p. 021005. [CrossRef]
Grutle, Ø. K. , 2015, “5-Axis 3D Printer,” M.S. thesis, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/47652
Teibrich, A. , Mueller, S. , and Guimbretière, F. , 2015, “Patching Physical Objects,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST), Charlotte, NC, Nov. 11–15, pp. 83–91.
Krassenstein, E. , 2014, “MIT Researchers Create a ‘Smart’ 3D Printer that can Locate an Object & Print on Top of It,” 3DPrint.com, https://3dprint.com/9952/mit-researchers-smart-3d-printer.
Gao, W. , Zhang, Y. , and Nazzetta, D. C. , 2015, “RevoMaker: Enabling Multi-Directional and Functionally-Embedded 3D Printing Using a Rotational Cuboidal Platform,” Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST), Charlotte, NC, Nov. 11–15, pp. 437–446.
Lee, W. , Wei, C. , and Chung, S. , 2014, “Development of a Hybrid Rapid Prototyping System Using Low-Cost Fused Deposition Modeling and Five-Axis Machining,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 214(11), pp. 2366–2374. [CrossRef]
Karunakaran, K. , Suryakumar, S. , and Pushpa, V. , 2010, “Low Cost Integration of Additive and Subtractive Processes for Hybrid Layered Manufacturing,” Rob. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 26(5), pp. 490–499. [CrossRef]
Uddin, M. S. , Sidek, M. F. R. , and Faizal, M. A. , 2017, “Evaluating Mechanical Properties and Failure Mechanisms of Fused Deposition Modeling Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Parts,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 139(8), p. 081018. [CrossRef]
Christiyan, K. J. , Chandrasekhar, U. , and Venkateswarlu, K. , 2016, “A Study on the Influence of Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed ABS Composite,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 114, p. 012109. [CrossRef]
Pan, A. , Huang, Z. , and Guo, R. , 2016, “Effect of FDM Process on Adhesive Strength of Polylactic Acid (PLA) Filament,” Key Eng. Mater., 667, pp. 181–186. [CrossRef]
Hossain, M. , Espalin, D. , and Ramos, J. , 2014, “Improved Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling-Manufactured Parts Through Build Parameter Modifications,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 061002. [CrossRef]
Fatimatuzahraa, A. , Farahaina, B. , and Yusoff, W. , 2011, “The Effect of Employing Different Raster Orientations on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts,” IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), Langkawi, Malaysia, Sept. 25–28, pp. 22–27.
Lanzotti, A. , Grasso, M. , and Staiano, G. , 2015, “The Impact of Process Parameters on Mechanical Properties of Parts Fabricated in PLA With an Open-Source 3-D Printer,” Rapid Prototyping J., 21(5), pp. 604–617. [CrossRef]
Ravi, P. , Shiakolas, P. S. , and Dnyaneshwar Thorat, A. , 2017, “Analyzing the Effects of Temperature, Nozzle-Bed Distance, and Their Interactions on the Width of Fused Deposition Modeled Struts Using Statistical Techniques Toward Precision Scaffold Fabrication,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 139(7), p. 071007. [CrossRef]
Gurrala, P. K. , and Regalla, S. P. , 2012, “Prediction of Neck Growth Due to Inter and Intra-Layer Bonding for High Strength Parts in Additive Manufacturing (AM),” (submitted).
Li, L. , Sun, Q. , and Bellehumeur, C. , 2002, “Investigation of Bond Formation in FDM Process,” Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Anonymous (SFF), Austin, TX, Aug. 5–7, pp. 400–407. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/846d/7e3101c52bde1bbfdee3ea11a11a130842b2.pdf
Sun, Q. , Rizvi, G. , and Bellehumeur, C. , 2008, “Effect of Processing Conditions on the Bonding Quality of FDM Polymer Filaments,” Rapid Prototyping J., 14(2), pp. 72–80. [CrossRef]
Turner, B. , Strong, R. , and Gold, S. , 2014, “A Review of Melt Extrusion Additive Manufacturing Processes: I. Process Design and Modeling,” Rapid Prototyping J., 20(3), pp. 192–204. [CrossRef]
Brockmann, W. , Geib, P. L. , and Klingen, J. , 2008, Adhesive Bonding: Materials, Applications and Technology, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany.
Wegman, R. F. , and Van Twisk, J. , 2012, Surface Preparation Techniques for Adhesive Bonding, Elsevier, Waltham, MA.
Azari, S. , Papini, M. , and Spelt, J. , 2010, “Effect of Surface Roughness on the Performance of Adhesive Joints Under Static and Cyclic Loading,” J. Adhes., 86(7), pp. 742–764. [CrossRef]
Hitchcock, S. , Carroll, N. , and Nicholas, M. , 1981, “Some Effects of Substrate Roughness on Wettability,” J. Mater. Sci., 16(3), pp. 714–732. [CrossRef]
Packham, D. , 1998, “The Mechanical Theory of Adhesion–A Seventy Year Perspective and Its Current Status,” First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Oct. 16–20, pp. 81–108. https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/BLCP%3ACN031901150/The-mechanical-theory-of-adhesion-A-seventy-year/
Uehara, K. , and Sakurai, M. , 2002, “Bonding Strength of Adhesives and Surface Roughness of Joined Parts,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 127(2), pp. 178–181. [CrossRef]
Sekercioglu, T. , Rende, H. , and Gulsoz, A. , 2003, “The Effects of Surface Roughness on the Strength of Adhesively Bonded Cylindrical Components,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 142(1), pp. 82–86. [CrossRef]
Pandey, P. M. , Reddy, N. V. , and Dhande, S. G. , 2003, “Real Time Adaptive Slicing for Fused Deposition Modelling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 43(1), pp. 61–71. [CrossRef]
Sun, S. H. , Chiang, H. W. , and Lee, M. I. , 2007, “Adaptive Direct Slicing of a Commercial CAD Model for Use in Rapid Prototyping,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 34(7–8), pp. 689–701. [CrossRef]
Siraskar, N. , Paul, R. , and Anand, S. , 2015, “Adaptive Slicing in Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Modified Boundary Octree Data Structure,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(1), p. 011007. [CrossRef]
Hope, R. L. , Roth, R. N. , and Jacobs, P. A. , 1997, “Adaptive Slicing With Sloping Layer Surfaces,” Rapid Prototyping J., 3(3), pp. 89–98. [CrossRef]
Panhalkar, N. , Paul, R. , and Anand, S. , 2014, “Increasing Part Accuracy in Additive Manufacturing Processes Using a K-D Tree Based Clustered Adaptive Layering,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 061017. [CrossRef]
Cubberly, W. H. , 1989, Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook Desk Edition, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test specimen: lower shoulder (white) primary part; upper section (red/dark) secondary part

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical fracture surfaces: (a) extruded substrate, (b) AM substrate, and (c) secondary geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Surface roughness for FFF-manufactured primary parts was controlled via build orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Bond strength versus first layer height

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Linear regression result

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Nonlinear regression model. Predicted optimal process parameters: Ra = 17.5 μm and t = 268 μm.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In