0
Research Papers

Automated Flexible Forming Strategy for Geometries With Multiple Features in Double-Sided Incremental Forming

[+] Author and Article Information
Ebot Ndip-Agbor

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern University,
2145 Sheridan Road,
Evanston, IL 60208
e-mail: ebot@u.northwestern.edu

Kornel Ehmann

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern University,
2145 Sheridan Road,
Evanston, IL 60208
e-mail: k-ehmann@northwestern.edu

Jian Cao

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern University,
2145 Sheridan Road,
Evanston, IL 60208
e-mail: jcao@northwestern.edu

Manuscript received April 11, 2017; final manuscript received October 30, 2017; published online December 21, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Gracious Ngaile.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(3), 031004 (Dec 21, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1246; doi: 10.1115/1.4038511 History: Received April 11, 2017; Revised October 30, 2017

Double-sided incremental forming (DSIF) is a dieless sheet metal forming process that uses two generic tools to form a part of arbitrary geometry from a clamped sheet via the accumulation of small localized deformations. In DSIF, there is a need for an automatic toolpath generation method to separate geometric features coupled with a strategy to form these features in the correct sequence such that they can be accurately formed. Traditional CNC machining toolpaths are not suitable for DSIF because these toolpaths are designed for material removal processes, which do not have to account for the motion of the virgin material during the process. This paper presents a novel and simple way to represent geometric features in a hierarchical tree structure during z-height-based slicing along with algorithms to generate different forming strategies using this tree structure. The proposed approach is demonstrated through physical experiments by forming a complex part with multiple features.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Algorithms , Geometry
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Jeswiet, J. , Micari, F. , Hirt, G. , Bramley, A. , Duflou, J. , and Allwood, J. , 2005, “ Asymmetric Single Point Incremental Forming of Sheet Metal,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 54(2), pp. 88–114. [CrossRef]
Loney, G. C. , and Ozsoy, T. M. , 1987, “ NC Machining of Free Form Surfaces,” Comput. Des., 19(2), pp. 85–90.
Li, H. , Dong, Z. , and Vickers, G. W. , 1994, “ Optimal Toolpath Pattern Identification for Single Island, Sculptured Part Rough Machining Using Fuzzy Pattern Analysis,” Comput. Des., 26(11), pp. 787–795.
Skjoedt, M. , Hancock, M. H. , and Bay, N. , 2007, “ Creating Helical Tool Paths for Single Point Incremental Forming,” Key Eng. Mater., 344, pp. 583–590. [CrossRef]
Lee, E. , 2003, “ Contour Offset Approach to Spiral Toolpath Generation With Constant Scallop Height,” CAD Comput. Aided Des., 35(6), pp. 511–518. [CrossRef]
Malhotra, R. , Reddy, N. V. , and Cao, J. , 2010, “ Automatic 3D Spiral Toolpath Generation for Single Point Incremental Forming,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132(6), p. 061003. [CrossRef]
Lu, B. , Chen, J. , Ou, H. , and Cao, J. , 2013, “ Feature-Based Tool Path Generation Approach for Incremental Sheet Forming Process,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 213(7), pp. 1221–1233. [CrossRef]
Cao, T. , Lu, B. , Ou, H. , Long, H. , and Chen, J. , 2016, “ Investigation on a New Hole-Flanging Approach by Incremental Sheet Forming Through a Featured Tool,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 110, pp. 1–17. [CrossRef]
Malhotra, R. , Cao, J. , Ren, F. , Kiridena, V. , Cedric Xia, Z. , and Reddy, N. V. , 2011, “ Improvement of Geometric Accuracy in Incremental Forming by Using a Squeezing Toolpath Strategy With Two Forming Tools,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 133(6), p. 061019. [CrossRef]
Meier, H. , Magnus, C. , and Smukala, V. , 2011, “ Impact of Superimposed Pressure on Dieless Incremental Sheet Metal Forming With Two Moving Tools,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 60(1), pp. 327–330. [CrossRef]
Malhotra, R. , Cao, J. , Beltran, M. , Xu, D. , Magargee, J. , Kiridena, V. , and Xia, Z. C. , 2012, “ Accumulative-DSIF Strategy for Enhancing Process Capabilities in Incremental Forming,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 61(1), pp. 251–254. [CrossRef]
Ndip-Agbor, E. , Smith, J. , Ren, H. , Jiang, Z. , Xu, J. , Moser, N. , Chen, W. , Xia, Z. C. , and Cao, J. , 2015, “ Optimization of Relative Tool Position in Accumulative Double Sided Incremental Forming Using Finite Element Analysis and Model Bias Correction,” Int. J. Mater. Form., 9(3), pp. 1–12.
Zhang, Z. , Ren, H. , Xu, R. , Moser, N. , Smith, J. , Ndip-Agbor, E. , Malhotra, R. , Xia, Z. C. , Ehmann, K. F. , and Cao, J. , 2015, “ A Mixed Double-Sided Incremental Forming Toolpath Strategy for Improved Geometric Accuracy,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(5), p. 051007. [CrossRef]
Lingam, R. , Prakash, O. , Belk, J. H. , and Reddy, N. V. , 2016, “ Automatic Feature Recognition and Tool Path Strategies for Enhancing Accuracy in Double Sided Incremental Forming,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 88(5–8), pp. 1–17.
Cormen, T. H. , 2009, Introduction to Algorithms, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Tsakalidis, A. K. , 1984, “ Maintaining Order in a Generalized Linked List,” Acta Inform., 21(1), pp. 101–112. [CrossRef]
Moser, N. , Zhang, Z. , Ren, H. , Zhang, H. , Shi, Y. , Ndip-Agbor, E. E. , Lu, B. , Chen, J. , Ehmann, K. F. , and Cao, J. , 2016, “ Effective Forming Strategy for Double-Sided Incremental Forming Considering in-Plane Curvature and Tool Direction,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 65(1), pp. 265–268. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Incremental forming strategies: (a) SPIF and (b) DSIF

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Illustration of a complex geometry: (a) isometric view and (b) exploded view showing features and their curvatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relationships between intersection curves: (a) on the same z-height and (b) on adjacent z-heights

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relationship map for a geometry: (a) intersection curves at two slicing planes, (b) in-plane relationship maps for curves on slicing plane 1 and (c) curves on slicing plane 2, (d) out-of-plane relationship maps for curves on slicing plane 1 and (e) curves on slicing plane 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Algorithm for constructing in-plane and out-of-plane relationship maps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Algorithm for combining curves into features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Rooted tree data structure showing parent, left child, and right sibling attributes of each node and (b) rooted tree representation of geometric features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Recursive algorithm for building feature tree from feature relationship map

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Strategy 1—forming parent features before child features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Strategy 2—Forming child features before parent features

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental setup showing top, bottom tool, and clamps

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Arbitrary complex geometry: (a) top view, (b) bottom view, and (c) exploded view with features annotated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Feature tree and forming strategies for test geometry: (a) feature tree, (b) strategy 1 forming sequence, (c) strategy 2 forming sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Experiment for strategy 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Experiment for strategy 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

(a) Sections A-A and B-B profiles in desired geometry, (b) section A-A, and (c) section B-B profiles both comparing strategies 1 and 2 to desired geometry

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In