Research Papers

Characterizing Energy Consumption in Injection Molding: Model Versus Logger

[+] Author and Article Information
Andrea Sánchez-Valencia

Smithers Rapra, Ltd.,
Shawbury SY4 4NR, Shropshire, UK
e-mail: ASanchezValencia@smithers.com

Julien Loste

Smithers Rapra, Ltd.,
Shawbury SY4 4NR, Shropshire, UK
e-mail: JLoste@smithers.com

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 28, 2017; final manuscript received October 16, 2017; published online January 3, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Karl R. Haapala.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(3), 031013 (Jan 03, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1397; doi: 10.1115/1.4038294 History: Received June 28, 2017; Revised October 16, 2017

Recent changes in legislation along with environmental initiatives to drive sustainability and reduce carbon emissions have sprouted the development of energy models to characterize manufacturing processes. In the case of injection molding, much work has been performed in coupling sensors with control statistical systems to promptly identify process' instabilities, such as pressure drops or fluctuations in the filling point. Latest energy models for injection molding make use of injection pressure and temperature parameters that are a function of the machine, mold geometry, and process characteristics. The latest state-of-the-art way to measure energy consumption is through the use of energy loggers, which provide power data at the end of the production cycles. Although seemingly correlated, little has been published on the extrapolation of cavity signals for their use in energy calculations. In this study, the advantages and disadvantages of using cavity sensors in injection molding are explored; a novel approach to the use of cavity sensors' pressure and temperature data is proposed by exploring their input in an energy model for the estimation of specific energy consumption (SEC). The model was validated against power data obtained via an energy logger; the averaged energy reported by the model indicated a range of 60–67% accuracy.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rubin, I. I. , 1972, Injection Molding Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York.
Grand View Research, 2015, “Injection Molded Plastic Market Report,” Grand View Research, Inc., San Francisco, CA, accessed Feb. 27, 2017, http://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/injection-molded-plastics-market
Thiriez, A. , 2004, “An Environmental Analysis of Injection Moulding,” Master's thesis, Massachussetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://www.mtmgroup.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Enviromental-Analysis-of-Injection-Moldin_MIT_2006.pdf
Kordonowy, D. N. , 2002, “A Power Assessment of Machining Tools,” Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/31108
Gutowski, T. , Dahmus, J. , and Thiriez, A. , 2006, “Electrical Energy Requirements for Manufacturing Processes,” 13th CIRP International Conference of Life Cycle Engineering, Lueven, Belgium, May 31–June 2. http://web.mit.edu/2.813/www/readings/Gutowski-CIRP.pdf
Madan, J. , Mani, M. , and Lyons, K. W. , 2013, “Characterizing Energy Consumption of the Injection Molding Process,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2013-1222.
Gallo, V. , and Montgomery, S. , 2012, “Achieve Process Transparency With In-Mold Cavity Sensors,” Gardner Business Media, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, accessed Nov. 6, 2017, https://www.ptonline.com/articles/achieve-process-transparency-with-in-mold-cavity-sensors
Collins, C. , 1999, “Monitoring Cavity Pressure Perfects Injection Molding,” Assem. Autom., 19(3), pp. 197–202. [CrossRef]
Nam, J. S. , Baek, D. S. , Jo, H. H. , Song, J. Y. , Ha, T. H. , and Lee, S. W. , 2015, “Lens Injection Moulding Condition Diagnosis and Form Error Analysis Using Cavity Pressure Signals Based on Response Surface Methodology,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 230(7), pp. 1343–1350. [CrossRef]
Estrada, P. , Siller, H. R. , Vázquez, E. , Rodríguez, C. A. , Martínez-Romero, O. , and Corona, R. , 2016, “Micro-Injection Moulding of Polymer Locking Ligation Systems,” Procedia CIRP, 49, pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
Wagemakers, T. , 2017, “Sensorising Injection Moulds,” Interviewee, Mar. 13.
INEOS, 2016, “Polypropylene Homopolymer,” INEOS Olefins & Polymers Europe, London.
Osswald, T. , and Hernandez-Ortiz, J. P. , 2006, “Processing Properties,” Polymer Processing, Modeling and Simulation, Hanser Publishers, Munich, Germany, pp. 37–47. [CrossRef]
Mettler Toledo, 2017, Thermal Analysis: Polymer DSC, Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH.
Plastik City, 2017, “Plastic Material Shrinkage Rates,” Plastik City, Coventry, UK, accessed Feb. 27, 2017, https://www.plastikcity.co.uk/useful-stuff/material-shrinkage-rates
Tsai, K.-M. , and Lan, J.-K. , 2015, “Correlation Between Runner Pressure and Cavity Pressure Within Injection Mold,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 79(1–4), pp. 273–284. [CrossRef]
PREVIEW, 2015, “Predictive System to Recommend Injection Mould Setup With Process Optimisation in Wireless Sensor Networks,” PREVIEW, Barcelona, Spain, accessed Mar. 16, 2017, http://www.preview-project.eu/
Naumann, R. , Dietzel, S. , Wartschinski, L. , Schumacher, B. , and Scheuermann, B. , 2017, “TANDEM: Prioritizing Wireless Communication for Robust Industrial Process Control,” 26th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 31–Aug. 3, pp. 1–9.
Vogelesang, H. , 2008, “An Introduction to Energy Consumption in Pumps,” World Pumps, 2008(496), pp. 28–31. [CrossRef]
Nguyen, D. T. , 2004, “Injection Molding Scrap Reduction: A Study in the Relationships of Plastics Processing Methods,” Master's thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=
Thiriez, A. , and Gutowski, T. , 2006, “An Environmental Analysis of Injection Molding,” IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (ISEE), Scottsdale, AZ, May 8–11, pp. 195–200.
Nannapaneni, S. , and Mahadevan, S. , 2014, “Uncertainty Quantification in Performance Evaluation of Manufacturing Processes,” IEEE International Conference on Big Data: Data Analytics for Smart Manufacturing Systems (BigData), Washington, DC, Oct. 27–30, pp. 996–1005.
University of Iowa, 2017, “Percent Error Formula,” University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, accessed Mar. 27, 2017, http://astro.physics.uiowa.edu/ITU/glossary/percent-error-formula/
Bendada, A. , Derdouri, A. , Simard, Y. , and Lamontagne, M. , 2007, “Advances in Infrared Technology for the Online Monitoring of Injection Moulding: Application to the Understanding of the Nature of Contact at the Polymer-Mould Interface,” Trans. Inst. Meas. Control, 29(5), pp. 431–451. [CrossRef]
Yokoi, H., Murata, Y., and Tsukakoshi, H., 1992, “Measurement of Melt Temperature Profiles During Filling and Packing Processes Using a New Integrated Thermocouple Sensor,” ANTEC 92-Shaping the Future, Detroit, MI, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Migler, K. , and Bur, A. J. , 1998, “Fluorescence Based Measurement of Temperature Profiles During Polymer Processing,” Polym. Eng. Sci., 38(1), pp. 213–221. [CrossRef]
Kusic, D. , Kek, T. , Slabe, J. M. , Svecko, R. , and Grum, J. , 2013, “The Impact of Process Parameters on Test Specimen Deviations and Their Correlation With AE Signals Captured During the Injection Moulding Cycle,” Polym. Test., 32(3), pp. 583–593. [CrossRef]
Pacher, G. , Berger, G. , Friesenbichler, W. , Gruber, D. , and Macher, J. , 2014, “In-Mold Sensor Concept to Calculate Process-Specific Rheological Properties,” AIP Conf. Proc., 1593(1), pp. 179–182. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4873759
Gordon, G. , Kazmer, D. O. , Tang, X. , Fan, Z. , and Gao, R. X. , 2015, “Quality Control Using a Multivariate Injection Molding Sensor,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 78(9–12), pp. 1381–1391. [CrossRef]
Müller, F. , Kukla, C. , Lucyshyn, T. , Harker, M. , Rath, G. , and Holzer, C. , 2014, “Wireless In-Mold Melt Front Detection for Injection Molding: A Long-Term Evaluation,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 131(11), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Gao, R. X. , Tang, X. T. , Gordon, G. , and Kazmer, D. O. , 2014, “Online Product Quality Monitoring Through In-Process Measurement,” CIRP Ann.-Manuf. Technol., 63(1), pp. 493–496. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Molded part used for the injection molding study: (a) dimensions and flow systems are indicated, along with a (b) accompanying isometric view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Location of sensors in the injection mold used

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cavity pressure profile. Adapted from Refs. [8] and [16].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

DOE results for the cavity pressure near the gate (left) and cavity pressure at the end-of-fill (right), along with the process temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Power data as a function of experiment no. obtained from the energy logger

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparative plots of the SEC data of the energy logger (-logg) compared against that obtained theoretically (-th)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Predictive accuracy of the SEC energy model as a function of varying parameter, Tinj. Logger data are representative of experiment A02.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In