0
Research Papers

Measurement of the Melt Pool Length During Single Scan Tracks in a Commercial Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process

[+] Author and Article Information
J. C. Heigel

Intelligent Systems Division,
Engineering Laboratory,
National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
e-mail: jarred.heigel@nist.gov

B. M. Lane

Intelligent Systems Division,
Engineering Laboratory,
National Institute of Standards and Technology,
Gaithersburg, MD 20899

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received July 19, 2017; final manuscript received August 4, 2017; published online March 7, 2018. Editor: Y. Lawrence Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 140(5), 051012 (Mar 07, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1453; doi: 10.1115/1.4037571 History: Received July 19, 2017; Revised August 04, 2017

This work presents high-speed thermographic measurements of the melt pool length during single track laser scans on nickel alloy 625 substrates. Scans are made using a commercial laser powder bed fusion (PBF) machine while measurements of the radiation from the surface are made using a high speed (1800 frames per second) infrared camera. The melt pool length measurement is based on the detection of the liquidus–solidus transition that is evident in the temperature profile. Seven different combinations of programmed laser power (49–195 W) and scan speed (200–800 mm/s) are investigated, and numerous replications using a variety of scan lengths (4–12 mm) are performed. Results show that the melt pool length reaches steady-state within 2 mm of the start of each scan. Melt pool length increases with laser power, but its relationship with scan speed is less obvious because there is no significant difference between cases performed at the highest laser power of 195 W. Although keyholing appears to affect the anticipated trends in melt pool length, further research is required.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Vasinonta, A. , Beuth, J. L. , and Ong, R. , 2001, “ Melt Pool Size Control in Thin-Walled and Bulky Parts Via Process Maps,” Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceedings (SFF), Austin, TX, Aug. 6–8, pp. 432–440. http://edge.rit.edu/edge/P10551/public/SFF/SFF%202001%20Proceedings/2001%20SFF%20Papers/49-Vasinonta.pdf
Hrabe, N. , and Quinn, T. , 2013, “ Effects of Processing on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a Titanium Alloy (Ti–6Al–4V) Fabricated Using Electron Beam Melting (EBM)—Part 1: Distance From Build Plate and Part Size,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 573, pp. 264–270. [CrossRef]
Dunbar, A. J. , Denlinger, E. R. , Gouge, M. F. , Simpson, T. W. , and Michaleris, P. , 2017, “ Comparisons of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Builds Through Experimental In Situ Distortion and Temperature Measurements,” Addit. Manuf., 15, pp. 57–65. [CrossRef]
Heigel, J. C. , Michaleris, P. , and Reutzel, E. W. , 2015, “ Thermo-Mechanical Model Development and Validation of Directed Energy Deposition Additive Manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V,” Addit. Manuf., 5, pp. 9–19. [CrossRef]
Dunbar, A. J. , Denlinger, E. R. , Gouge, M. F. , and Michaleris, P. , 2016, “ Experimental Validation of Finite Element Modeling for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Deformation,” Addit. Manuf., 12(Part A), pp. 108–120. [CrossRef]
Denlinger, E. R. , Heigel, J. C. , Michaleris, P. , and Palmer, T. A. , 2015, “ Effect of Inter-Layer Dwell Time on Distortion and Residual Stress in Additive Manufacturing of Titanium and Nickel Alloys,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 215, pp. 123–131. [CrossRef]
Doubenskaia, M. , Pavlov, M. , Grigoriev, S. , Tikhonova, E. , and Smurov, I. , 2012, “ Comprehensive Optical Monitoring of Selective Laser Melting,” J. Laser Micro Nanoeng., 7(3), pp. 236–243. [CrossRef]
Cho, C.-H. , Hsieh, Y.-C. , and Chen, H.-Y. , 2015, “ Welding Pool Measurement Using Thermal Array Sensor,” Proc. SPIE, 9609, p. 960912.
Kruth, J.-P. , Mercelis, P. , Van Vaerenbergh, J. , and Craeghs, T. , 2007, “ Feedback Control of Selective Laser Melting,” Third International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping, Leiria, Portugal, Sept. 24–29, pp. 521–527.
Touloukian, Y. S. , and DeWitt, D. P. , 1970, Thermal radiative properties: metallic elements and alloys (Thermophysical Properties of Matter; the TPRC Data Series, A Comprehensive Compilation of Data), Vol. 7, IFI/Plenum, New York. [CrossRef]
Doubenskaia, M. , Pavlov, M. , Grigoriev, S. , and Smurov, I. , 2013, “ Definition of Brightness Temperature and Restoration of True Temperature in Laser Cladding Using Infrared Camera,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 220, pp. 244–247. [CrossRef]
Price, S. , Lydon, J. , Cooper, K. , and Chou, K. , 2013, “ Experimental Temperature Analysis of Powder-Based Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing,” Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceedings (SFF), Austin, TX, Aug. 12–14, pp. 162–173. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/Manuscripts/2013/2013-13-Price.pdf
Cheng, B. , Price, S. , Lydon, J. , Cooper, K. , and Chou, K. , 2014, “ On Process Temperature in Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing: Model Development and Validation,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 61018. [CrossRef]
Price, S. , Cheng, B. , Lydon, J. , Cooper, K. , and Chou, K. , 2014, “ On Process Temperature in Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing: Process Parameter Effects,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 61019. [CrossRef]
Yadroitsev, I. , Krakhmalev, P. , and Yadroitsava, I. , 2014, “ Selective Laser Melting of Ti6Al4V Alloy for Biomedical Applications: Temperature Monitoring and Microstructural Evolution,” J. Alloys Compd., 583, pp. 404–409. [CrossRef]
Lane, B. , Moylan, S. , Whitenton, E. , and Ma, L. , 2015, “ Thermographic Measurements of the Commercial Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process at NIST,” Rapid Prototyping J., 22(5), pp. 778–787. [CrossRef]
Lane, B. , and Whitenton, E. , 2015, “ Calibration and Measurement Procedures for a High Magnification Thermal Camera,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, Report No. NISTIR 8098. http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2016/NIST.IR.8098.pdf
Montgomery, C. , Beuth, J. , Sheridan, L. , and Klinbeil, N. , 2015, “ Process Mapping of Inconel 625 in Laser Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing,” Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceedings (SFF), Austin, TX, Aug. 10–12, pp. 1195–1204. https://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2015/2015-97-Montgomery.pdf
Khairallah, S. A. , Anderson, A. T. , Rubenchik, A. , and King, W. E. , 2016, “ Laser Powder-Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing: Physics of Complex Melt Flow and Formation Mechanisms of Pores, Spatter, and Denudation Zones,” Acta Mater., 108, pp. 36–45. [CrossRef]
del Campo, L. , Pérez-Sáez, R. B. , González-Fernández, L. , Esquisabel, X. , Fernández, I. , González-Martín, P. , and Tello, M. J. , 2010, “ Emissivity Measurements on Aeronautical Alloys,” J. Alloys Compd., 489(2), pp. 482–487. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Thermography setup on the commercial laser PBF system with the thermal camera set adjacent to the testing position and the custom door open, exposing the sample holder and video camera inside the chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Calibration results of the infrared camera

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The five samples held by the rotary stage as seen from the camera's perspective through the viewport on the custom door

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

A comparison of infrared images acquired from each case. Each image is representative of those acquired during steady-state for each case. Temperatures below the detectable range of the camera (550 °C radiant) are not shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Radiant temperature profile extracted along the horizontal lines in Fig. 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The example temperature curves from Fig. 5, isolated to the radiant temperature profile behind the 1038 °C isotherm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

An example of the algorithm used to detect the discontinuity at the liquidus–solidus transition. The radiant temperature profile is from the case 7 profile presented in Fig. 6. The minimum of the second derivative is used to identify the transition (vertical line through each plot).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The radiant temperature associated with the liquidus–solidus transition discontinuity in every frame for case 7. Outliers are excluded from the analysis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Melt pool length as a function of laser scan distance for cases 5–7. The black solid line represents the average melt pool length during steady-state while the black dashed lines are±1σ.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the melt pool lengths of each case. Cases with the same nominal laser power are grouped together to highlight the similarities in melt pool length. Error bars represent measurement variance of ±1σ.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The representative images and average melt pool length measurement mapped onto the P–V space. The shaded region in the upper left hand corner indicates where keyholing is expected according to Montgomery et al. [18].

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In