0
Research Papers

Investigation on the Effects of Process Parameters on Defect Formation in Friction Stir Welded Samples Via Predictive Numerical Modeling and Experiments

[+] Author and Article Information
Abhishek Ajri

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907

Yung C. Shin

Fellow ASME
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907
e-mail: shin@purdue.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received June 12, 2017; final manuscript received June 22, 2017; published online September 13, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Wayne Cai.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 139(11), 111009 (Sep 13, 2017) (10 pages) Paper No: MANU-17-1370; doi: 10.1115/1.4037240 History: Received June 12, 2017; Revised June 22, 2017

Setting optimum process parameters is very critical in achieving a sound friction stir weld joint. Understanding the formation of defects and developing techniques to minimize them can help in improving the overall weld strength. The most common defects in friction stir welding (FSW) are tunnel defects, cavities, and excess flash formation, which are caused due to incorrect tool rotational or advancing speed. In this paper, the formation of these defects is explained with the help of an experimentally verified 3D finite element (FE) model. It was observed that the asymmetricity in temperature distribution varies for different types of defects formed during FSW. The location of the defect also changes based on the shoulder induced flow and pin induced flow during FSW. Besides formation of defects like excess flash, cavity defects, tunnel/wormhole defects, two types of groove like defects are also discussed in this paper. By studying the different types of defects formed, a methodology is proposed to recognize these defects and counter them by modifying the process parameters to achieve a sound joint for a displacement-based FSW process.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Effect of process parameters on defect formation (adapted from Podržaj et al. [2])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental setup for FSW of Al 7075 T6 butt welds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Temperature cycle recorded by thermocouple and pyrometer at emissivity of 0.16

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Boundary conditions used in the CEL model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Spot chosen in front of tool to record the temperature cycle in the FE model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

(a) Equivalent plastic strain distribution and (b) etched friction stir weld cross section (AS—advancing side; RS—retreating side)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Cross section a-a measuring peak temperature distribution during the formation of the weld cross section and cross section b-b showing fully formed weld microstructure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of process parameters on defect formation in FSW

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Temperature distribution during tunnel defect formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Tunnel defect observed in the bottom half of the advancing side of the weld (as viewed from cross section B-B). (narrow long arrow—shoulder induced flow; wide short arrow—pin induced flow).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Experimental and simulation results of tunnel defect formation and (b) top view of weld and material velocity distribution in friction stir weld

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Groove-like defect (type B) observed in the top half of the advancing side of the weld (as viewed from cross section B-B). (top arrow—shoulder induced flow; bottom arrow—pin induced flow).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

(a) Experimental and simulation results of groove-like type b defect formation and (b) top view of weld and material velocity distribution in friction stir weld. (AS—advancing side, RS—retreating side, LE—leading edge, TE—trailing edge).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Groove-like defect (type A) observed in the top half of the advancing side of the weld (as viewed from cross section B-B). (top arrow—shoulder induced flow; bottom arrow—pin induced flow).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Temperature distribution during groove defect type B formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Cavity defect observed in the bottom half of the advancing side of the weld (as viewed from cross section B-B). (top long arrow—shoulder induced flow; bottom short arrow—pin induced flow).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

(a) Experimental results and (b) simulation results of tunnel defect formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Temperature distribution during cavity defect formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Material velocity distribution during formation of cavity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Excess flash formation defect due to excessive heat input: (a) simulation and (b) experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Temperature distribution during excess flash defect formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Temperature distribution during sound weld formation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Material velocity distribution during sound weld joint formation

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In