Research Papers

Fabrication of Foamed Polyethersulfone–Zeolite Mixed Matrix Membranes for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell Humidification

[+] Author and Article Information
Russell Borduin

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712

Wei Li

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
The University of Texas at Austin,
Austin, TX 78712
e-mail: weiwli@austin.utexas.edu

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received April 19, 2016; final manuscript received July 25, 2016; published online August 24, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Donggang Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 139(2), 021004 (Aug 24, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: MANU-16-1232; doi: 10.1115/1.4034400 History: Received April 19, 2016; Revised July 25, 2016

Polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) fuel cell efficiency must be improved in order to become cost competitive with fossil fuel-based technologies. Approaches to increasing cost efficiency include raising fuel cell operating temperature, reducing component cost, and properly controlling fuel cell humidification. We sought to fulfill all three requirements by developing a new low-cost, high-temperature humidification membrane material. Currently, Nafion dominates the membrane humidifier market due to its excellent water transport characteristics, but its high price (∼$1000/m2) and low maximum operating temperature (<90 °C) drive up fuel cell cost. We developed a competing polyethersulfone (PES)–zeolite mixed matrix membrane (MMM) with a porous microstructure. Solvent casting was used to form the initial PES–zeolite films, followed by solid-state foaming to alter the film morphology and create a porous structure. The effects of both zeolite weight loading and foaming duration on membrane permeability were investigated. Membrane measurement results show that both foaming and increased zeolite weight loading enhance membrane water permeability close to levels seen in Nafion. Meanwhile, the membranes satisfy the Department of Energy (DOE) crossover gas requirement for humidification membrane materials.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


James, B. D. , Moton, J. M. , and Colella, W. G. , 2014, “ Mass Production Cost Estimation of Direct H2 PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation Applications: 2014 Update,” Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington, VA.
Satyapal, S. , Mills, M. , Byham, S. , Hou, Z. , and Nahm, K. S. , 2008, “ Fuel Cell Cost Analysis Summary,” International Partnership for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in the Economy (IPHE), Washington, DC.
Ahluwalia, R. K. , and Wang, X. , 2014, “ Fuel Cells Systems Analysis,” U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2011 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Washington, DC, May 9–13, p. 8.
DOE, 2016, “ Fuel Cell Technologies Office Multi-Year Research, Development and Demonstration Plan,” U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Washington, DC, Section 3.4, pp. 3–24.
Hughes, R. , 1996, Industrial Membrane Separation Technology, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Goswami, S. , Klaus, S. , and Benziger, J. , 2008, “ Wetting and Absorption of Water Drops on Nafion Films,” Langmuir, 24(16), pp. 8627–8633. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Benjamin, T. G. , 2007, “ Membrane and MEA Accelerated Stress Test Protocols,” U.S. Department of Energy Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program 2007 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting, Arlington, VA, May 15–18, pp. 5–12.
Baker, R. W. , 2004, Membrane Technology and Applications, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
Basile, A. , and Nunes, S. , 2011, Advanced Membrane Science and Technology for Sustainable Energy and Environmental Applications, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
Bowen, T. C. , Noble, R. D. , and Falconer, J. L. , 2004, “ Fundamentals and Applications of Pervaporation Through Zeolite Membranes,” J. Membr. Sci., 245(1), pp. 1–33. [CrossRef]
Schult, K. , and Paul, D. , 1997, “ Water Sorption and Transport in Blends of Polyethyloxazoline and Polyethersulfone,” J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 35(6), pp. 993–1007. [CrossRef]
Ciobanu, G. , Carja, G. , and Ciobanu, O. , 2007, “ Preparation and Characterization of Polymer–Zeolite Nanocomposite Membranes,” Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 27(5), pp. 1138–1140. [CrossRef]
Mittal, V. , 2013, Polymer Nanocomposite Foams, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Krause, B. , Mettinkhof, R. , Van der Vegt, N. , and Wessling, M. , 2001, “ Microcellular Foaming of Amorphous High-Tg Polymers Using Carbon Dioxide,” Macromolecules, 34(4), pp. 874–884. [CrossRef]
Krause, B. , Boerrigter, M. , Van der Vegt, N. , Strathmann, H. , and Wessling, M. , 2001, “ Novel Open-Cellular Polysulfone Morphologies Produced With Trace Concentrations of Solvents as Pore Opener,” J. Membr. Sci., 187(1), pp. 181–192. [CrossRef]
Gargiulo, M. , Sorrentino, L. , and Iannace, S. , 2008, “ High Performance Polymeric Foams,” AIP Conf. Proc., 1042, pp. 109–111.
Sun, H. , Sur, G. S. , and Mark, J. E. , 2002, “ Microcellular Foams From Polyethersulfone and Polyphenylsulfone: Preparation and Mechanical Properties,” Eur. Polym. J., 38(12), pp. 2373–2381. [CrossRef]
ASTM, 2013, “ Standard Test Method for Water Vapor Transmission Rate of Sheet Materials Using Dynamic Relative Humidity Measurement,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, Standard No. ASTM E398-13.
Wiederhorn, S. , Fields, R. , Low, S. , Bahng, G.-W. , Wehrstedt, A. , Hahn, J. , Tomota, Y. , Miyata, T. , Lin, H. , Freeman, B. D. , Aihara, S. , Hagihara, S. , and Tagawa, T. , 2006, “ Mechanical Properties,” Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods, H. Czichos , T. Saito , and L. Smith , eds., Springer Science+Business Media, Wurzburg, Germany, pp. 371–396.
Siripurapu, S. , DeSimone, J. M. , Khan, S. A. , and Spontak, R. J. , 2005, “ Controlled Foaming of Polymer Films Through Restricted Surface Diffusion and the Addition of Nanosilica Particles or CO2-Philic Surfactants,” Macromolecules, 38(6), pp. 2271–2280. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Percent CO2 saturation versus saturation pressure for PES [1517]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Solid-state foaming process for PES films

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

System diagram of accumulation permeability measurement system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

SEM of PES membrane cross section at 600× magnification with no added zeolite

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

SEM of foamed PES film cross section at 600× magnification showing porous region and dense skin layers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

SEM of 30% zeolite film cross sections at 600× magnification for unfoamed (a), 1 s foamed (b), and 3 s foamed (c) conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

SEM of 50% zeolite film cross sections at 600× magnification for unfoamed (a), 1 s foamed (b), and 3 s foamed (c) conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effect of solid-state foaming on membrane water vapor permeation rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of zeolite weight loading percent on membrane water vapor permeation rate



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In