Research Papers: JOINING

Influence of Weld Defects and Postweld Heat Treatment of Gas Tungsten Arc-Welded AA-6061-T651 Aluminum Alloy

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohammad W. Dewan

Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University and A&M College,
2508 Patrick F. Taylor Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: mdewan1@tigers.lsu.edu

M. A. Wahab

Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Louisiana State University and A&M College,
2508 Patrick F. Taylor Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: wahab@me.lsu.edu

Ayman M. Okeil

Associate Professor
Department of Civil
and Environmental Engineering,
Louisiana State University and A&M College, 3513E Patrick F. Taylor Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: aokeil@.lsu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 10, 2014; final manuscript received March 26, 2015; published online September 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Jingjing Li.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(5), 051027 (Sep 04, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1665; doi: 10.1115/1.4030333 History: Received December 10, 2014

Welding defects and the reduction of mechanical performances are the foremost problems for fusion welded aluminum alloys joints. The influences of weld defects and postweld heat treatment (PWHT) on tensile properties of gas tungsten arc (GTA) welded aluminum alloy AA-6061-T651 joints are investigated in this current study. All welded specimens are nondestructively inspected with phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) to classify weld defect and measure the projected defects area-ratio (AR). Ultimate tensile strength (UTS) decreased linearly with the increase of the size of weld defect but tensile toughness behaved nonlinearly with defect size. Depending on defect size, defective samples' joint efficiency (JE) varied from 35% to 48% of base metal's (BM) UTS. Defect-free as-welded (AW) specimens observed to have 53% and 34% JE based on UTS and yield strength (YS) of BM, respectively. PWHT was applied on defect-free welded specimens to improve tensile properties by precipitation hardening, microstructures refining, and removal of postweld residual stresses. Solution treatment (ST) (at 540 °C) followed by varying levels of artificial age-hardening (AH) time was investigated to obtain optimum tensile properties. For GTA-welded AA-6061-T651, peak aging time was 5 hr at 180 °C. PWHT specimens showed 85% JE based on UTS and up to a 71% JE based on YS of BM. However, toughness values decreased about 29% due to the presence of precipitate-free fusion zones. The experimental investigations can be used to establish weld acceptance/rejection criteria and for the design of welded aluminum alloy structures.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Metzger, G. E. , 1967, “Some Mechanical Properties of Welds in 6061 Aluminum Alloy Sheet,” Weld. J., 46(10), pp. s457–s469.
Dudas, J. H. , and Collins, F. R. , 1966, “Preventing Weld Cracks in High Strength Aluminum Alloys,” Weld. J., 45(6), pp. s241–s249.
Lakshminarayanan, A. K. , Balasubramanian, V. , and Elangovan, K. , 2009, “Effect of Welding Processes on Tensile Properties of AA6061 Aluminium Alloy Joints,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 40(3–4), pp. 286–296. [CrossRef]
Martukanitz, R. P. , 1993, “Selection and Weldability of Heat-Treatable Aluminum Alloys,” ASM Handbook, Welding, Brazing, and Soldering, Vol. 6, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 528–536.
Greenberg, H. D. , 1966, Applications of Fracture Toughness Parameters to Structural Metals, Gordon and Breach, New York.
Morton, T. M. , 1971, “Defects in 2021 Aluminum Alloy Welds,” Weld. J., 50(7), pp. 304–312.
Rudy, J. F. , and Rupert, E. J. , 1970, “Effects of Porosity on Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Welds,” Weld. Res. Suppl., 49(7), pp. 322s–336s.
Lawrence, F. V., Jr. , Munse, W. H. , and Burk, J. D. , 1975, Effects of Porosity on the Fatigue Properties of 5083 Aluminum Alloy Weldments, Welding Research Council Bulletin WRC 206, Welding Research Council, Shaker Heights, OH.
Burk, J. D. , and Lawrence, F. V. , 1976, Effects of Lack-of-Penetration and Lack-of-Fusion on the Fatigue Properties of 5083 Aluminum Alloy Welds, Defense Technical Information Center, Ft. Belvoir, VA.
De Michelis, C. , Dotti, D. , Ghia, S. , Mozzoni, M. , and Sala, A. , 1989, “Sizing of Reference Defects by a New Phased Array Ultrasonic System,” International Conference on Monitoring, Surveillance and Predictive Maintenance of Plants and Structures, Italian Society for Nondestructive Testing, pp. 593–599.
Bird, C. R. , 2002, “Characterisation and Sizing of Weld Defects Using Phased Array Technology,” Annual Conference of the British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing, British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing, pp. 93–98.
Choqueuse, D. , and Lamarre, A. , 1998, “Use of Phased Array Ultrasonic Equipment for Fatigue Crack Characterization for Underwater Inspection of Offshore Structures,” 8th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Montreal, Canada, May 24–29, pp. 86–89.
Crowther, P. , 2004, “Practical Experience of Phased Array Technology for Power Station Applications,” Insight: Non-Destr. Test. Cond. Monit., 46(9), pp. 525–528. [CrossRef]
Moles, M. , Dube, N. , and Jacques, F. , 2003, “Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for Thick Section Weld Inspections,” Joining of Advanced and Specialty Materials VI-Proceedings From Materials Solutions 2003 on Joining of Advanced and Specialty Materials, ASM International, pp. 112–118.
Birks, A. S. , Green, R. E. J. , and McIntire, P. , 1991, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH.
Li, B. , Shen, Y. , and Hu, W. , 2011, “The Study on Defects in Aluminum 2219-T6 Thick Butt Friction Stir Welds With the Application of Multiple Non-Destructive Testing Methods,” Mater. Des., 32(4), pp. 2073–2084. [CrossRef]
Leggatt, R. H. , 2008, “Residual Stresses in Welded Structures,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 85(3), pp. 144–151. [CrossRef]
Deng, D. , Murakawa, H. , and Liang, W. , 2008, “Numerical and Experimental Investigations on Welding Residual Stress in Multi-Pass Butt-Welded Austenitic Stainless Steel Pipe,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 42(2), pp. 234–244. [CrossRef]
Zhao, H. , Zhang, G. , Yin, Z. , and Wu, L. , 2013, “Effects of Interpass Idle Time on Thermal Stresses in Multipass Multilayer Weld-Based Rapid Prototyping,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135(1), p. 011016. [CrossRef]
Malin, V. , 1995, “Study of Metallurgical Phenomena in the HAZ of 6061-T6 Aluminum Welded Joints,” Weld. J., 74(9), pp. S305–S318.
Maisonnette, D. , Suery, M. , Nelias, D. , Chaudet, P. , and Epicier, T. , 2011, “Effects of Heat Treatments on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of a 6061 Aluminium Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 528(6), pp. 2718–2724. [CrossRef]
Malarvizhi, S. , Raghukandan, K. , and Viswanathan, N. , 2008, “Investigations on the Influence of Post-Weld Heat Treatment on Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of Electron Beam Welded AA2219 Alloy,” Int. J. Fatigue, 30(9), pp. 1543–1555. [CrossRef]
Akhter, R. , Ivanchev, L. , and Burger, H. P. , 2007, “Effect of Pre/Post T6 Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of Laser Welded SSM Cast A356 Aluminium Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 447(1–2), pp. 192–196. [CrossRef]
Damodaram, R. , Raman, S. G. S. , and Rao, K. P. , 2014, “Effect of Post-Weld Heat Treatments on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Friction Welded Alloy 718 Joints,” Mater. Des., 53, pp. 954–961. [CrossRef]
Sivaraj, P. , Kanagarajan, D. , and Balasubramanian, V. , 2014, “Effect of Post-Weld Heat Treatment on Tensile Properties and Microstructure Characteristics of Friction Stir Welded Armour Grade AA7075-T651 Aluminium Alloy,” Def. Technol., 10(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Elangovan, K. , and Balasubramanian, V. , 2008, “Influences of Post-Weld Heat Treatment on Tensile Properties of Friction Stir-Welded AA6061 Aluminum Alloy Joints,” Mater. Charact., 59(9), pp. 1168–1177. [CrossRef]
Bhanumurthy, K. , Kumbhar, N. , and Sharma, B. P. , 2007, “Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Composition Variation Across the Interface for the FSW 6061 Al Alloy Weldments,” 4th Symposium on Friction Stir Welding and Processing, Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, pp. 379–388.
El-Danaf, E. A. , and El-Rayes, M. M. , 2013, “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Welded 6082 AA in as Welded and Post Weld Heat Treated Conditions,” Mater. Des., 46, pp. 561–572. [CrossRef]
Aydın, H. , Bayram, A. , and Durgun, I. , 2010, “The Effect of Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical Properties of 2024-T4 Friction Stir-Welded Joints,” Mater. Des., 31(5), pp. 2568–2577. [CrossRef]
Ahmad, R. , and Bakar, M. A. , 2011, “Effect of a Post-Weld Heat Treatment on the Mechanical and Microstructure Properties of AA6061 Joints Welded by the Gas Metal Arc Welding Cold Metal Transfer Method,” Mater. Des., 32(10), pp. 5120–5126. [CrossRef]
Peng, D. , Shen, J. , Tang, Q. , Wu, C.-P. , and Zhou, Y.-B. , 2013, “Effects of Aging Treatment and Heat Input on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of TIG-Welded 6061-T6 Alloy Joints,” Int. J. Miner., Metall. Mater., 20(3), pp. 259–265. [CrossRef]
Ding, J.-k. , Wang, D.-p. , Wang, Y. , and Du, H. , 2014, “Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment on Properties of Variable Polarity TIG Welded AA2219 Aluminium Alloy Joints,” Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 24(5), pp. 1307–1316. [CrossRef]
Dewan, M. W. , Liang, J. , Wahab, M. A. , and Okeil, A. M. , 2013, “Post-Weld Residual Stresses and Heat Treatments of Gas Tungsten Arc Welded Aluminum Alloy AA6061-T651,” World J. Eng., 10(1), pp. 11–22. [CrossRef]
Rao, Z. , Liu, J. , Wang, P.-C. , Li, Y. , and Liao, S. , 2014, “Modeling of Cold Metal Transfer Spot Welding of AA6061-T6 Aluminum Alloy and Galvanized Mild Steel,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Cao, R. , Sun, J. H. , Chen, J. H. , and Wang, P.-C. , 2014, “Cold Metal Transfer Joining of Aluminum AA6061-T6-to-Galvanized Boron Steel,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(5), p. 051015. [CrossRef]
Ravindra, A. , and Dwarakadasa, E. S. , 1992, “Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Gas Tingsten Arc Welds of Al-Li Alloy 8090,” J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 11(22), pp. 1543–1546. [CrossRef]
Liu, H. J. , Chen, Y. C. , and Feng, J. C. , 2006, “Effect of Heat Treatment on Tensile Properties of Friction Stir Welded Joints of 2219-T6 Aluminium Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Technol., 22(2), pp. 237–241. [CrossRef]
Garrett, R. P. , Lin, J. , and Dean, T. A. , 2005, “An Investigation of the Effects of Solution Heat Treatment on Mechanical Properties for AA 6xxx Alloys: Experimentation and Modelling,” Int. J. Plast., 21(8), pp. 1640–1657. [CrossRef]
Gao, Y. , Liu, Z.-X. , and Wang, P.-C. , 2014, “Effect of Aging on the Strength of Clinching Galvanized SAE1004 Steel-to-Aluminum AA6111 Joints,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(4), p. 041016. [CrossRef]
Tan, C. F. , and Said, M. R. , 2009, “Effect of Hardness Test on Precipitation Hardening Aluminium Alloy 6061-T6,” Chiang Mai J. Sci., 36(3), pp. 276–286.
ASM-International, 1990, ASM Handbook Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Howse, D. S. , and Lucas, W. , 2000, “Investigation Into Arc Constriction by Active Fluxes for Tungsten Inert Gas Welding,” Sci. Technol. Weld. Joining, 5(3), pp. 189–193. [CrossRef]
Dewan, M. W. , Liang, J. , Wahab, M. A. , and Okeil, A. M. , 2014, “Effect of Post-Weld Heat Treatment and Electrolytic Plasma Processing on Tungsten Inert Gas Welded AISI 4140 Alloy Steel,” Mater. Des., 54, pp. 6–13. [CrossRef]
Tobe, T. , and Lawrenece, F. V. , 1977, “Effect of Inadequate Joint Penetration on Fatigue Resistance of High-Strength Structural Steel Welds,” Weld. Res. Suppl., 56(9), pp. 259s–266s.
Hu, B. , and Richardson, I. M. , 2007, “Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of AA7075(T6) Hybrid Laser/GMA Welds,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 459(1–2), pp. 94–100. [CrossRef]
Rajakumar, S. , and Balasubramanian, V. , 2012, “Establishing Relationships Between Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Alloys and Optimised Friction Stir Welding Process Parameters,” Mater. Des., 40, pp. 17–35. [CrossRef]
Menzemer, C. , Lam, P. C. , Srivatsan, T. S. , and Wittel, C. F. , 1999, “An Investigation of Fusion Zone Microstructures of Welded Aluminum Alloy Joints,” Mater. Lett., 41(4), pp. 192–197. [CrossRef]
Aydın, H. , Bayram, A. , Uğuz, A. , and Akay, K. S. , 2009, “Tensile Properties of Friction Stir Welded Joints of 2024 Aluminum Alloys in Different Heat-Treated-State,” Mater. Des., 30(6), pp. 2211–2221. [CrossRef]
Cabibbo, M. , Meccia, E. , and Evangelista, E. , 2003, “TEM Analysis of a Friction Stir-Welded Butt Joint of Al–Si–Mg Alloys,” Mater. Chem. Phys., 81(2–3), pp. 289–292. [CrossRef]
Cho, J. R. , Lee, B. Y. , Moon, Y. H. , and Van Tyne, C. J. , 2004, “Investigation of Residual Stress and Post Weld Heat Treatment of Multi-Pass Welds by Finite Element Method and Experiments,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 155(SI), pp. 1690–1695. [CrossRef]
Zakharov, V. V. , 2003, “Some Problems of the Use of Aluminum-Lithium Alloys,” Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 45(1–2), pp. 49–54. [CrossRef]
Gao, R. Q. , Stiller, K. , Hansen, V. , Oskarsson, A. , and Danoix, F. , 2002, “Influence of Aging Conditions on the Microstructure and Tensile Strength of Aluminium Alloy 6063,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 396(4), pp. 1211–1216.
Dewan, M. W. , Wahab, M. A. , Liang, J. , and Okeil, A. , 2012, “Effects of Residual Stresses and the Post Weld Heat Treatments of TIG Welded Aluminum Alloy AA6061-T651,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2012-85889. [CrossRef]
Krishnan, K. N. , 2002, “The Effect of Post Weld Heat Treatment on the Properties of 6061 Friction Stir Welded Joints,” J. Mater. Sci., 37(3), pp. 473–480. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Tensile test curves of GTA-welded AA-6061-T651 aluminum alloy with different welding defect

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Plot shows the relationship between the defect sizes measured with OM and PAUT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Tensile strength versus defect cross-sectional AR measured with PAUT and OM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Toughness versus area reduction ratio measured with PAUT and OM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SEM fractographs of: (a) BM of unwelded specimen, (b) weld metal of AW specimen, and (c) HAZ metal of AW specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

SEM fractographs of tensile tested welded specimens with different types of weld defects: (a) LOP, (b) LOF, and (c) void

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variations of tensile strength and toughness due to PWHT

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Effect of PWHT on fusion zone microstructure. Finer microstructures are observed in (b) heat-treated (STAH-5h) specimen as compared to (a) AW specimen.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Effect of PWHT on hardness profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

SEM fractographs of PWHT samples: (a) only AH, (b) STAH-5h, and (c) STAH-18h

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cross-sectional view of tensile tested specimens with different weld defects obtained with OM: (a) no defect, (b) voids, (c) LOF, and (d) LOP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The C and S-scan views of tensile test samples obtained with PAUT: (a) no-defect, (b) voids, (c) LOF, and (d) LOP

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Welding configurations and tensile specimens (all dimensions are in millimeter)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In