Research Papers: JOINING

Clamp Load Decay Due to Material Creep of Lightweight-Material Joints Under Cyclic Temperature

[+] Author and Article Information
Sayed A. Nassar

Fellow ASME
Fastening and Joining Research Institute (FAJRI),
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: nassar@oakland.edu

Amir Kazemi

Fastening and Joining Research Institute (FAJRI),
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 27, 2014; final manuscript received February 12, 2015; published online September 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Edmund Chu.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(5), 051025 (Sep 04, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1636; doi: 10.1115/1.4029830 History: Received November 27, 2014

Experimental and finite element techniques are used for investigating the effect of cyclic thermal loading on the clamp load decay in preloaded single-lap bolted joints that are made of multimaterial lightweight alloys. Substrate material combinations include aluminum, magnesium, and steel, with various coupon thicknesses. The range of cyclic temperature profile varies between −20 °C and +150 °C in a computer-controlled environmental chamber for generating the desired cyclic temperature profile and durations. Real time clamp load data are recorded using strain gage-based, high-temperature, load cells. Clamp load decay is investigated for various combinations of joint materials, initial preload level, and substrate thickness. Thermal and material creep finite element analysis (FEA) is performed using temperature-dependent mechanical properties. The FEA model and results provided a valuable insight into the experimental results regarding the vulnerability of some lightweight materials to significant material creep at higher temperatures.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Lutsey, N. , 2010, Review of Technical Literature and Trends Related to Automobile Mass-Reduction Technology, University of California, Davis, CA.
Lotus Engineering, 2010, An Assessment of Mass Reduction Opportunities for a 2017–2020 Model Year Vehicle Program, The International Council on Clean Transportation, Norfolk, UK.
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 2001, Rules for Bolted Flange Connections With Ring Type Gaskets, Section VIII, Division 2, Appendix 2, ASME, New York.
Sato, T. , and Kado, K. , 2006, “Inelastic Analysis of Sealing Characteristics of Flanges With Metal Ring Joint Gasket at Elevated Temperature,” ASME Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVT-11-93288. [CrossRef]
Sato, T. , and Kado, K. , 2005, “Inelastic Analysis of Dissimilar Material Flanges With Metal Ring Gaskets at Elevated Temperature,” ASME Paper No. PVP2005-71131. [CrossRef]
Caccese, V. , Berube, K. A. , Fernandez, M. , Melo, J. D. , and Kabche, J. P. , 2009, “Influence of Stress Relaxation on Clamp-Up Force in Hybrid Composite-To-Metal Bolted Joints,” J. Compos. Struct., 89(2), pp. 285–293. [CrossRef]
Ekh, J. , and Schon, J. , 2006, “Load Transfer in Multirow, Single Shear, Composite-To-Aluminum Lap Joints,” J. Compos. Sci. Technol., 66(7–8), pp. 875–885. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. , Nassar, S. A. , and Wu, Z. , 2008, “Thermo-Mechanical Behavior of a Stainless Steel Threaded Fitting With a Pre-Compressed Gasket,” ASME Paper No. PVP2008-61114. [CrossRef]
Chen, H. S. , and Kung, H. K. , 2002, “A Hygrothermal Sensitivity Evaluation on the Clamp Torque of Bolted Composite Joint,” Proceedings of American Society for Composite, 17th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Composites, pp. 98–107.
Shivakumar, K. N. , and Crews, J. H. , 1982, “Bolt Clamp-Up Relaxation in a Graphite/Epoxy Laminate,” Langley Research Center, Report No. NASA TM-83268, pp. 1–30.
Ganeshmurthy, S. , and Nassar, S. A. , 2014, “Finite Element Simulation of Process Control for Bolt Tightening in Joints With Nonparallel Contact,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(2), p. 021018. [CrossRef]
Han, G. , Wang, M. , Liu, Z. , and Wang, P.-C. , 2013, “A New Joining Process for Magnesium Alloys: Rotation Friction Drilling Riveting,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135(3), p. 031012. [CrossRef]
abaqus 6.13 Documentation.
Norton, F. H. , 1929, The Creep of Steels at High Temperatures, Mc-Graw Hill, New York.
Spigarelli, S. , and Mehtedi, M. El ., 2010, “Creep as an Extension of Hot Working: A Unified Approach to High Temperature Deformation of AZ31 Alloy,” J. Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 527(21–22), pp. 5708–5714. [CrossRef]
Lou, B. Y. , Huang, J. C. , Wang, T. D. , and Langdon, T. G. , 2002, “Flow Behaviour of Aluminum-Based Materials at Ultrahigh Temperatures in the Presence of Liquid Phase,” J. Mater. Trans., 43(3), pp. 501–509. [CrossRef]
Mahmudi, R. , Ansary, Sh. , and Esfandyarpour, M. J. , 2012, “Indentation Creep of the Wrought AZ31 Magnesium Alloy,” J. Mater. Sci., 47(20), pp. 7181–7188. [CrossRef]
Agilent, 2012, DAQ-U2331A Software Manual, Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA.
ASTM A36 Steel Plate Data Sheet.
Metals Handbook, 1990, Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, 10th ed., Vol. 2, ASM International, Russell Township, OH.
ELEKTRON Limited, Division of Magnesium, Registration No. 3141950, Salford, Great Britain.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test specimen thickness and material combinations for FEA and experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Illustration of cyclic temperature profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Clamp load versus thermal cycling time (similar material SLJ/high preload)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Clamp load versus thermal cycling time (dissimilar-material SLJ/high preload)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Experimental and finite element data comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Changes in bolt length (Lb) and grip length (Lc) due to thermal and preload effect

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles for steel-based joints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles for aluminum-based joints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles (magnesium-based SLJ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of initial clamp load level on clamp load decay due to creep



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In