Research Papers: JOINING

Clamp Load Decay Due to Material Creep of Lightweight-Material Joints Under Cyclic Temperature

[+] Author and Article Information
Sayed A. Nassar

Fellow ASME
Fastening and Joining Research Institute (FAJRI),
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309
e-mail: nassar@oakland.edu

Amir Kazemi

Fastening and Joining Research Institute (FAJRI),
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 27, 2014; final manuscript received February 12, 2015; published online September 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Edmund Chu.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(5), 051025 (Sep 04, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1636; doi: 10.1115/1.4029830 History: Received November 27, 2014

Experimental and finite element techniques are used for investigating the effect of cyclic thermal loading on the clamp load decay in preloaded single-lap bolted joints that are made of multimaterial lightweight alloys. Substrate material combinations include aluminum, magnesium, and steel, with various coupon thicknesses. The range of cyclic temperature profile varies between −20 °C and +150 °C in a computer-controlled environmental chamber for generating the desired cyclic temperature profile and durations. Real time clamp load data are recorded using strain gage-based, high-temperature, load cells. Clamp load decay is investigated for various combinations of joint materials, initial preload level, and substrate thickness. Thermal and material creep finite element analysis (FEA) is performed using temperature-dependent mechanical properties. The FEA model and results provided a valuable insight into the experimental results regarding the vulnerability of some lightweight materials to significant material creep at higher temperatures.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Changes in bolt length (Lb) and grip length (Lc) due to thermal and preload effect

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test specimen thickness and material combinations for FEA and experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Illustration of cyclic temperature profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles for steel-based joints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles for aluminum-based joints

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Normalized clamp load versus number of thermal cycles (magnesium-based SLJ)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effect of initial clamp load level on clamp load decay due to creep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Experimental and finite element data comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Clamp load versus thermal cycling time (dissimilar-material SLJ/high preload)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Clamp load versus thermal cycling time (similar material SLJ/high preload)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In