0
Research Papers

Real-Time Acoustic and Pressure Characterization of Two-Phase Flow for Quality Control of Expanded Polystyrene Injection Molding Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
James N. Magarian

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: magarian@mit.edu

Robert D. White, Douglas M. Matson

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Tufts University,
Medford, MA 02155

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 18, 2015; final manuscript received October 7, 2015; published online November 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Allen Y. Yi.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 138(5), 051002 (Nov 16, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-15-1240; doi: 10.1115/1.4031796 History: Received May 18, 2015; Revised October 07, 2015

A method is proposed for real-time process monitoring for expanded polystyrene (EPS) injection molding systems. The method employs measurement of two variables: vacuum pressure in the EPS supply hose and phase difference between two points along an acoustic standing wave generated within the EPS flow path. High-speed videography is utilized as a secondary means of monitoring the injection molding process. Video data are correlated with pressure and acoustic data to substantiate those variables’ validity as indicators of intended molding system performance. Data show recorded parameter curve shapes to be indicative of key injection molding milestone events, such as valve timing and changes in flow regime.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Schellenberg, J. , and Wallis, M. , 2010, “ Dependence of Properties of Expandable Polystyrene Particle Foam on Degree of Fusion,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 115(5), pp. 2986–2990. [CrossRef]
Chang, R. R. , Chiang, T. H. , Tseng, Y. C. , and Su, C. Y. , 2011, “ Normalization Process Technique of Composite Foam-Filled Sandwich Wind Turbine Blades,” Procedia Eng., 14, pp. 1988–1995. [CrossRef]
Wall, K. F. , Bhavnani, S. H. , Overfelt, R. A. , Sheldon, D. S. , and Williams, K. , 2003, “ Investigation of the Performance of an Expandable Polystyrene Injector for Use in the Lost-Foam Casting Process,” Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 34(6), pp. 843–851. [CrossRef]
Matson, D. M. , Venkatesh, R. , and Biederman, S. , 2007, “ Expanded Polystyrene Lost Foam Casting—Modeling Bead Steaming Operations,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129(2), pp. 425–434. [CrossRef]
Smith, B. V. , and Biederman, S. , 2000, “ Examining Lost Foam's ‘White Side’,” Mod. Cast., 90(8), pp. 30–34.
Kaczorowski, R. , Just, P. , and Pacyniak, T. , 2013, “ Test Bench for Analyzing the Lost Foam Process,” Arch. Foundry Eng., 13(1), pp. 57–62. [CrossRef]
Biederman, S. , Zhao, Q. , and Matson, D. M. , 2006, “ High-Speed Video Analysis of Pattern Filling and Fusion in the Molding Operation of the Lost Foam Casting Process,” Trans. Am. Foundry Soc., 114, pp. 913–920.
Lye, S. W. , and Yeong, H. Y. , 1992, “ Computer-Assisted Mould Design for Styrofoam Products,” Comput. Ind., 18(2), pp. 117–126. [CrossRef]
Hahn, O. , Fahrig, H. M. , and Wappelhorst, M. , 1997, “ Structure of an Information System for EPS Patternmaking During the Lost Foam Process,” Giesserei, 84, pp. 15–22.
Mencel, D. C. , Venkatesh, R. , and Matson, D. M. , 2006, “ Analyzing Fill Gun Transient Activity During Expanded Polystyrene Pattern Fill Operations,” Trans. Am. Foundry Soc., 114, pp. 955–964.
Magarian, J. N. , 2007, “ Real-Time Digital Characterization of Two-Phase Flow During Expandable Polystyrene (EPS) Pattern Molding for the Lost Foam Casting Process,” M.S. dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.
Biederman, S. , Zhao, Q. , and Matson, D. M. , 2006, “ Filling the Void in Lost Foam Patterns,” Mod. Cast., 96(12), pp. 42–44.
Kalpakjian, S. , and Schmid, S. R. , 2008, Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials, 5th ed., Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 223–225.
Mencel, D. C. , and Matson, D. M. , 2007, “ Analytically Modeling Dynamic Bead Front Growth During the Fabrication of Expandable Polystyrene Patterns,” Trans. Am. Foundry Soc., 115, pp. 911–922.
Yan, Y. , 1996, “ Mass Flow Measurement of Bulk Solids in Pneumatic Pipelines,” Meas. Sci. Technol., 7(12), pp. 1687–1706. [CrossRef]
Gajewski, J. B. , 2013, “ Accuracy of Cross Correlation Velocity Measurements in Two-Phase Gas–Solid Flows,” Flow Meas. Instrum., 30, pp. 133–137. [CrossRef]
Song, D. , Peng, L. , Lu, G. , Yang, S. , and Yan, Y. , 2009, “ Digital Image Processing Based Mass Flow Rate Measurement of Gas/Solid Two-Phase Flow,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 147(1), p. 012048. [CrossRef]
Wang, Q. , Yang, C. , Wang, H. , Cui, Z. , and Gao, Z. , 2013, “ Online Monitoring of Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flow Using Projected CG Method in ECT Image Reconstruction,” Particuology, 11(2), pp. 204–215. [CrossRef]
Yian, L. , Zhiyao, H. , Haifeng, J. , and Haiqing, L. , 2008, “ Solids Volume Fraction Measurement of Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flow Based on Terahertz Time-Domain Spectroscopy Technique,” 2008 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference Proceedings, pp. 2141–2145.
Xu, G. , Liang, C. , Chen, X. , Liu, D. , Xu, P. , Shen, L. , and Zhao, C. , 2013, “ Investigation on Dynamic Calibration for an Optical-Fiber Solids Concentration Probe in Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flows,” Sensors, 13(7), pp. 9201–9222. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kinsler, L. E. , Frey, A. R. , Coppens, A. B. , and Sanders, J. V. , 2000, Fundamentals of Acoustics, 4th ed., Wiley, New York.
Epstein, P. S. , and Carhart, R. R. , 1953, “ The Absorption of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions. I. Water Fog in Air,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 25(3), pp. 553–565. [CrossRef]
Allegra, J. R. , and Hawley, S. A. , 1972, “ Attenuation of Sound in Suspensions and Emulsions: Theory and Experiments,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 51(5B), pp. 1545–1564. [CrossRef]
Davis, M. C. , 1979, “ Attenuation of Sound in Highly Concentrated Suspensions and Emulsions,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65(2), pp. 387–390. [CrossRef]
Callister, W. D. , 2003, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, 6th ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 34–35.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the experimental setup showing a (a) complete EPS bead flow path from vented hopper, through test section, through injection fill gun, to half-transparent mold tooling, (b) isometric view of the test section, and (c) photograph of the half-transparent mold tooling (injection fill gun can be seen in top right corner)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Pneumatic schematic of fill gun test system: (a) fill gun connected to dual air supplies, including separate vacuum drive and fill gun tip control systems and (b) section view of Nymphius JS8/200 G fill gun

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Dimensional parameters and nomenclature of acoustic portion of test section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Electrical and data acquisition schematic of the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

High-speed videography and image analysis employed to verify bead velocities and flow rates: (a) screen capture from high-speed video system, depicting two-phase flow just beginning to traverse the transparent test section tube but not yet reaching the mold cavity and (b) view of grid overlay on filled mold image for the purposes of surface bead counting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

EPS fill gun characterization: inline test section pressure (vacuum) versus applied fill gun drive pressure (positive)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Complete time-domain characterization of a single mold fill, with fill gun driven at 552 kPa (80 psi): (a) EPS-air vacuum pressure versus time, (b) EPS-air flow velocity versus time, (c) EPS bead flow rate versus time, (d) test section acoustic amplitude ratio (microphone 1/microphone 2) versus time, and (e) test section acoustic phase angle (between microphones) versus time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Parameter profiles during mold fills driven at various pressures: (a) EPS-air vacuum pressure profiles at three distinct drive pressures and (b) test section acoustic phase angle (between microphones) profiles at three distinct drive pressures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Vacuum pressure correlations during 552 kPa (80 psi) driven mold fill: (a) correlation between flow velocity and EPS-air vacuum pressure and (b) correlation between bead flow rate (beads/s) and EPS-air vacuum pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Acoustic phase angle (between microphones) correlations during 552 kPa (80 psi) driven mold fill: (a) correlation between acoustic phase angle and velocity and (b) correlation acoustic phase angle and bead flow rate (beads/s)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In