Research Papers

Partial Differential Equation-Based Multivariable Control Input Optimization for Laser-Aided Powder Deposition Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiaoqing Cao

International Center for Automotive Research,
Clemson University,
4 Research Drive,
Greenville, SC 29607
e-mail: xiaoqin@g.clemson.edu

Beshah Ayalew

International Center for Automotive Research,
Clemson University,
4 Research Drive,
Greenville, SC 29607
e-mail: beshah@clemson.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received June 26, 2014; final manuscript received July 14, 2015; published online October 1, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Jack Zhou.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 138(3), 031001 (Oct 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1348; doi: 10.1115/1.4031265 History: Received June 26, 2014; Revised July 14, 2015

This paper deals with the systematic optimization method for multiple input variables (laser irradiation power and scanning speed) in a class of laser-aided powder deposition (LAPD) processes. These processes are normally described by a coupled system of nonlinear partial differential equations (PDEs). To begin with, a desired solid–liquid (S/L) interface geometry is first approximated from a few practical process target parameters that define the desired process properties. Then, the control problem is formulated as one of seeking the optimal combination of process inputs that achieves close tracking of the desired S/L interface in quasi-steady state. The paper details the derivation of the adjoint-based solution for this PDE-constrained multivariable control input optimization problem. The effectiveness of the proposed method is illustrated via a case study on a laser cladding process.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Laeng, J. , Stewart, J. , and Liou, F. W. , 2000, “ Laser Metal Forming Processes for Rapid Prototyping—A Review,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 38(16), pp. 3973–3996. [CrossRef]
Gibson, I. , Rosen, D. W. , and Stucker, B. , 2010, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer, New York.
Majumdar, J. D. , and Manna, I. , 2011, “ Laser Material Processing,” Int. Mater. Rev., 56(5–6), pp. 341–388. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y. , Leu, M. C. , Mazumder, J. , and Donmez, A. , 2015, “ Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(1), p. 014001. [CrossRef]
Fathi, A. , Toyserkani, E. , Khajepour, A. , and Durali, M. , 2006, “ Prediction of Melt Pool Depth and Dilution in Laser Powder Deposition,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 39(12), pp. 2613–2623. [CrossRef]
Song, L. , and Mazumder, J. , 2011, “ Feedback Control of Melt Pool Temperature During Laser Cladding Process,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 19(6), pp. 1349–1356. [CrossRef]
Hofman, J. , Pathiraj, B. , van Dijk, J. , de Lange, D. , and Meijer, J. , 2012, “ A Camera Based Feedback Control Strategy for the Laser Cladding Process,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 212(11), pp. 2455–2462. [CrossRef]
Salehi, D. , and Brandt, M. , 2006, “ Melt Pool Temperature Control Using labview in Nd: YAG Laser Blown Powder Cladding Process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 29(3–4), pp. 273–278. [CrossRef]
Fathi, A. , Khajepour, A. , Toyserkani, E. , and Durali, M. , 2007, “ Clad Height Control in Laser Solid Freeform Fabrication Using a Feedforward PID Controller,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 35(3–4), pp. 280–292. [CrossRef]
Morville, S. , Carin, M. , Peyre, P. , Gharbi, M. , Carron, D. , Le Masson, P. , and Fabbro, R. , 2012, “ 2D Longitudinal Modeling of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow During Multilayered Direct Laser Metal Deposition Process,” J. Laser Appl., 24, p. 032008. [CrossRef]
Wen, S. , and Shin, Y. C. , 2010, “ Modeling of Transport Phenomena During the Coaxial Laser Direct Deposition Process,” J. Appl. Phys., 108(4), p. 044908. [CrossRef]
Qi, H. , Mazumder, J. , and Ki, H. , 2006, “ Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow in Coaxial Laser Cladding Process for Direct Metal Deposition,” J. Appl. Phys., 100(2), p. 024903. [CrossRef]
Han, L. , and Liou, F. , 2004, “ Numerical Investigation of the Influence of Laser Beam Mode on Melt Pool,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47(19), pp. 4385–4402. [CrossRef]
Saldi, Z. S. , 2012, “ Marangoni Driven Free Surface Flows in Liquid Weld Pools,” Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Traidia, A. , 2011, “ Multiphysics Modeling and Numerical Simulation of GTA Weld Pools,” Ph. D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
Sethian, J. , and Smereka, P. , 2003, “ Level Set Methods for Fluid Interfaces,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 35(1), pp. 341–372. [CrossRef]
Pinkerton, A. J. , and Lin, L. , 2004, “ Modeling Powder Concentration Distribution From a Coaxial Deposition Nozzle for Laser-Based Rapid Tooling,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 126(1), pp. 33–41. [CrossRef]
Pal, D. , Patil, N. , Zeng, K. , and Stucker, B. , 2014, “ An Integrated Approach to Additive Manufacturing Simulations Using Physics Based, Coupled Multiscale Process Modeling,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 061022. [CrossRef]
Cheng, B. , Price, S. , Lydon, J. , Cooper, K. , and Chou, K. , 2014, “ On Process Temperature in Powder-Bed Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing: Model Development and Validation,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(6), p. 061018. [CrossRef]
Safdar, S. , Pinkerton, A. J. , Li, L. , Sheikh, M. A. , and Withers, P. J. , 2013, “ An Anisotropic Enhanced Thermal Conductivity Approach for Modeling Laser Melt Pools for Ni-Base Super Alloys,” Appl. Math. Modell., 37(3), pp. 1187–1195. [CrossRef]
Kamara, A. , Wang, W. , Marimuthu, S. , and Li, L. , 2011, “ Modeling of the Melt Pool Geometry in the Laser Deposition of Nickel Alloys Using the Anisotropic Enhanced Thermal Conductivity Approach,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B: J. Eng. Manuf., 225(1), pp. 87–99.
Le Guen, E. , Carin, M. , Fabbro, R. , Coste, F. , and Le Masson, P. , 2011, “ 3D Heat Transfer Model of Hybrid Laser Nd: Yag-MAG Welding of S355 Steel and Experimental Validation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54(7), pp. 1313–1322. [CrossRef]
Peyre, P. , Aubry, P. , Fabbro, R. , Neveu, R. , and Longuet, A. , 2008, “ Analytical and Numerical Modelling of the Direct Metal Deposition Laser Process,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 41(2), p. 025403. [CrossRef]
Zhang, W. , Kim, C.-H. , and DebRoy, T. , 2004, “ Heat and Fluid Flow in Complex Joints During Gas Metal Arc Welding—Part II: Application to Fillet Welding of Mild Steel,” J. Appl. Phys., 95(9), pp. 5220–5229. [CrossRef]
Tang, L. , and Landers, R. G. , 2011, “ Layer-to-Layer Height Control for Laser Metal Deposition Process,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 133(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Song, L. , Bagavath-Singh, V. , Dutta, B. , and Mazumder, J. , 2012, “ Control of Melt Pool Temperature and Deposition Height During Direct Metal Deposition Process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 58(1–4), pp. 247–256.
Jameson, A. , 1988, “ Aerodynamic Design Via Control Theory,” J. Sci. Comput., 3(3), pp. 233–260. [CrossRef]
Repke, S. , Marheineke, N. , and Pinnau, R. , 2010, On Adjoint-Based Optimization of a Free Surface Stokes Flow, Fraunhofer-Institut für Techno-und Wirtschaftsmathematik, Fraunhofer (ITWM).
Vossen, G. , Hermanns, T. , and Schüttler, J. , 2013, “ Analysis and Optimal Control for Free Melt Flow Boundaries in Laser Cutting With Distributed Radiation,” ZAMM—J. Appl. Math. Mech./Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 95(3), pp. 297–316. [CrossRef]
Bernauer, M. K. , and Herzog, R. , 2011, “ Optimal Control of the Classical Two-Phase Stefan Problem in Level Set Formulation,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 33(1), pp. 342–363. [CrossRef]
Volkov, O. , and Protas, B. , 2009, “ An Inverse Model for a Free-Boundary Problem With a Contact Line: Steady Case,” J. Comput. Phys., 228(13), pp. 4893–4910. [CrossRef]
Hinze, M. , and Ziegenbalg, S. , 2007, “ Optimal Control of the Free Boundary in a Two-Phase Stefan Problem,” J. Comput. Phys., 223(2), pp. 657–684. [CrossRef]
Vossen, G. , and Hermanns, T. , 2014, “ On an Optimal Control Problem in Laser Cutting With Mixed Finite-/Infinite-Dimensional Constraints,” J. Ind. Manage. Optim., 10(2), pp. 503–519. [CrossRef]
Volkov, O. , Protas, B. , Liao, W. , and Glander, D. W. , 2009, “ Adjoint-Based Optimization of Thermo-Fluid Phenomena in Welding Processes,” J. Eng. Math., 65(3), pp. 201–220. [CrossRef]
Wu, C. , Chen, J. , and Zhang, Y. , 2007, “ Numerical Analysis of Both Front-and Back-Side Deformation of Fully-Penetrated GTAW Weld Pool Surfaces,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 39(3), pp. 635–642. [CrossRef]
Hofman, J. T. , 2009, Development of an Observation and Control System for Industrial Laser Cladding, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Medina, I. , and Ramses, J. , 2013, “ Development and Application of a CFD Model of Laser Metal Deposition,” Ph.D thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester.
Al-Khalidy, N. , 1997, “ Application of Optimization Methods for Solving Inverse Phase-Change Problems,” Numer. Heat Transfer, 31(4), pp. 477–497. [CrossRef]
Pham, X.-T. , 2013, “ Two-Dimensional Rosenthal Moving Heat Source Analysis Using the Meshless Element Free Galerkin Method,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A: Appl., 63(11), pp. 807–823. [CrossRef]
Cao, X. , and Ayalew, B. , 2015, “ Control-Oriented MIMO Modeling of Laser-Aided Powder Deposition Processes,” IEEE American Control Conference (ACC), Chicago, IL, July 1–3.
Pinkerton, A. J. , 2007, “ An Analytical Model of Beam Attenuation and Powder Heating During Coaxial Laser Direct Metal Deposition,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 40(23), pp. 7323–7334. [CrossRef]
Toyserkani, E. , Khajepour, A. , and Corbin, S. , 2004, “ 3-D Finite Element Modeling of Laser Cladding by Powder Injection: Effects of Laser Pulse Shaping on the Process,” Opt. Lasers Eng., 41(6), pp. 849–867. [CrossRef]
Kumar, A. , and Roy, S. , 2009, “ Effect of Three-Dimensional Melt Pool Convection on Process Characteristics During Laser Cladding,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 46(2), pp. 495–506. [CrossRef]
De Oliveira, U. , Ocelik, V. , and De Hosson, J. T. M. , 2005, “ Analysis of Coaxial Laser Cladding Processing Conditions,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 197(2), pp. 127–136. [CrossRef]
Li, S. , and Petzold, L. , 2004, “ Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis for Time-Dependent Partial Differential Equations With Adaptive Mesh Refinement,” J. Comput. Phys., 198(1), pp. 310–325. [CrossRef]
Tröltzsch, F. , 2010, Optimal Control of Partial Differential Equations: Theory, Methods, and Applications, American Mathematical Soc., Providence, RI.
Neittaanmaki, P. , and Tiba, D. , 1994, Optimal Control of Nonlinear Parabolic Systems: Theory: Algorithms and Applications, CRC Press, New York.
Han, L. , Phatak, K. , and Liou, F. , 2004, “ Modeling of Laser Cladding With Powder Injection,” Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 35(6), pp. 1139–1150. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the LAPD processes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Iterations of objective function in the optimization

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Mathematical modeling of the process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Evolution of multiple control inputs (laser power and scanning speed) in the optimization. Optimal control inputs u= 495.5 W and v= 7.27 mm/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Iterations of S/L interface in the optimization. Optimized S/L interface approaches the well-designed (desired) S/L interface under the proposed computational algorithm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Iterations of temperature error percentage on S/L interface. Temperature T on the predefined S/L interface approaches the melting temperature Tm (where S/L interface is defined) with optimization iterations, resulting in a close tracking of the predefined S/L interface under the proposed computational algorithm.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Parabolic S/L interface approximation. The well-designed S/L interface (dashed line) serves as an ideal case where the process target parameters are included with physical feasibility. The practically designed S/L interface (solid line) is approximated from the proposed parabolic function in Eq. (8).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of optimized S/L interfaces with and without the weighting function. With the proposed weighting method (solid line), a better tracking in terms of the process target parameters is achieved compared with that without this weighting method (dashed line).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In