Research Papers

The Effect of Laser Type and Power on the Efficiency of Industrial Cutting of Mild and Stainless Steels

[+] Author and Article Information
Jetro Pocorni

Department of Engineering
Sciences and Mathematics,
Luleå University of Technology,
Luleå 971 87, Sweden
e-mail: Jetro.Pocorni@ltu.se

Dirk Petring

Fraunhofer ILT,
Steinbachstr. 15,
Aachen 52074, Germany
e-mail: Dirk.Petring@ilt.fraunhofer.de

John Powell

Department of Engineering
Sciences and Mathematics,
Luleå University of Technology,
Luleå 971 87, Sweden
e-mail: John.Powell@laserexp.co.uk

Eckard Deichsel

Bystronic Laser AG,
Industriestr. 21,
Niederönz CH-3362, Switzerland
e-mail: Eckard.Deichsel@bystronic.com

Alexander F. H. Kaplan

Department of Engineering
Sciences and Mathematics,
Luleå University of Technology,
Luleå 971 87, Sweden
e-mail: Alexander.Kaplan@ltu.se

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received May 6, 2015; final manuscript received July 27, 2015; published online October 1, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Y. B. Guo.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 138(3), 031012 (Oct 01, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: MANU-15-1212; doi: 10.1115/1.4031190 History: Received May 06, 2015; Revised July 27, 2015

This paper investigates the effect of material type, material thickness, laser wavelength, and laser power on the efficiency of the cutting process for industrial state-of-the-art cutting machines. The cutting efficiency is defined in its most basic terms: as the area of cut edge created per Joule of laser energy. This fundamental measure is useful in producing a direct comparison between the efficiency of fiber and CO2 lasers when cutting any material. It is well known that the efficiency of the laser cutting process generally reduces as the material thickness increases, because conductive losses from the cut zone are higher at the lower speeds associated with thicker section material. However, there is an efficiency dip at the thinnest sections. This paper explains this dip in terms of a change in laser–material interaction at high cutting speeds. Fiber lasers have a higher cutting efficiency at thin sections than their CO2 counterparts, but the efficiency of fiber laser cutting falls faster than that of CO2 lasers as the material thickness increases. This is the result of a number of factors including changes in cut zone absorptivity and kerf width. This paper presents phenomenological explanations for the relative cutting efficiencies of fiber lasers and CO2 lasers and the mechanisms affecting these efficiencies for stainless steels (cut with nitrogen) and mild steel (cut with oxygen or nitrogen) over a range of thicknesses. The paper involves a discussion of both theoretical and practical engineering issues.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Steen, W. M. , and Kamalu, J. N. , 1983, “ Laser Cutting,” Laser Material Processing, M. Bass , ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 17–111.
Yilbas, B. S. , and Kar, A. , 1998, “ Thermal and Efficiency Analysis of CO2 Laser Cutting Process,” Opt. Lasers Eng., 29(1), pp. 17–32. [CrossRef]
Yilbas, B. S. , 2004, “ Laser Cutting Quality Assessment and Thermal Efficiency Analysis,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 155–156, pp. 2106–2115. [CrossRef]
Niziev, V. G. , and Nesterov, A. V. , 1999, “ Influence of Beam Polarization on Laser Cutting Efficiency,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 32(13), pp. 1455–1461. [CrossRef]
Wandera, C. , and Kujanpaa, V. , 2010, “ Characterization of the Melt Removal Rate in Laser Cutting of Thick-Section Stainless Steel,” J. Laser Appl., 22(2), pp. 62–70. [CrossRef]
Black, I. , 1999, “ A Comparison of Severance Energies for Reactive CO2 Laser Cutting of Mild Steel,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 15(11), pp. 832–834. [CrossRef]
Lütke, M. , and Hauptmann, J. , 2012, “ Energetic Efficiency of Remote Cutting in Comparison to Conventional Fusion Cutting,” J. Laser Appl., 24(2), p. 022007. [CrossRef]
Goppold, C. , Zenger, K. , Herwig, P. , Wetzig, A. , Mahrle, A. , and Beyer, E. , 2014, “ Experimental Analysis for Improvements of Process Efficiency and Cut Edge Quality of Fusion Cutting With 1 μm Laser Radiation,” Phys. Procedia, 56, pp. 892–900. [CrossRef]
Petring, D. , 2001, “ Basic Description of Laser Cutting,” LIA Handbook of Laser Materials Processing, J. F. Ready and D. F. Farson , eds., Laser Institute of America and Magnolia Publishing, Orlando, FL, pp. 425–433.
Petring, D. , Schneider, F. , Wolf, N. , and Nazery, G. V. , 2009, “ How Beam Quality, Power and Wavelength Influence Laser Cutting and Welding Processes,” 5th International Congress on Laser Advanced Materials Processing, LAMP 2009, Kobe, Japan, Jun 29–Jul 2, pp. 1–8.
Varga, T. , and Spörk, N. , 1998, “ Materials and Workpiece Classification,” Handbook of the EuroLaser Academy, 1st ed., Vol. 2, D. Schuocker , ed., Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 146–182.
Henning, T. , and Mutschke, H. , 1997, “ Low-Temperature Infrared Properties of Cosmic Dust Analogues,” Astron. Astrophys., 327, pp. 743–754.
Powell, J. , Petring, D. , Kumar, R. V. , Al-Mashikhi, S. O. , Kaplan, A. F. H. , and Voisey, K. T. , 2009, “ Laser–Oxygen Cutting of Mild Steel: The Thermodynamics of the Oxidation Reaction,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 42(1), p. 015504. [CrossRef]
Powell, J. , Al-Mashikhi, S. O. , Kaplan, A. F. H. , and Voisey, K. T. , 2011, “ Fibre Laser Cutting of Thin Section Mild Steel: An Explanation of the ‘Striation Free’ Effect,” Opt. Lasers Eng., 49(8), pp. 1069–1075. [CrossRef]
Petring, D. , Molitor, T. , Schneider, F. , and Wolf, N. , 2012, “ Diagnostics, Modeling and Simulation: Three Keys Towards Mastering the Cutting Process With Fiber, Disk and Diode Lasers,” Phys. Procedia, 39, pp. 186–196. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Relative cutting efficiency results for stainless steel (nitrogen cutting gas)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relative cutting efficiency results for mild steel cut with nitrogen assist gas

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Relative cutting efficiency results for mild steel cut with oxygen assist gas. (Note: the 3 mm sample cut with the 2 kW fiber laser and oxygen assist gas had the highest efficiency ofthe whole experimental set and is thus normalized to a value of 1.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relative average kerf width measurements for samples cut by (a) fiber laser and (b) CO2 laser

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relative cutting volume efficiency for stainless steel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relative cutting volume efficiency for mild steel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

During laser cutting the laser beam interacts with the cut front at a glancing angle [14]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Left: if the material is 1 mm thick and the beam is 200 μm wide then the cut front angle needs to be 11 deg if all the cutting front is to interact with the beam. (b) Right: if the cut front angle is changed, for example, to the 3 deg (the Brewster angle for CO2 lasers) then the absorptivity is high but most of the beam misses the cut front. (The beam and cut front geometry have, of course, been greatly simplified in this figure.)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Absorptivity as a function of cut front/laser beam glancing angle (glancing angle = (90 deg − angle of incidence), see Fig. 7)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Multiple reflections in a fiber laser cut kerf




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In