0
Special Section Articles

Cloud-Based Global Supply Chain: A Conceptual Model and Multilayer Architecture

[+] Author and Article Information
Hossein Akbaripour

Industrial Engineering Department,
Sharif University of Technology,
Azadi Avenue,
Tehran 11365-11155, Iran
e-mail: akbaripour@ie.sharif.edu

Mahmoud Houshmand

Professor
Industrial Engineering Department,
Sharif University of Technology,
Azadi Avenue,
Tehran 11365-11155, Iran
e-mail: hoshmand@sharif.edu

Omid Fatahi Valilai

Assistant Professor
Industrial Engineering Department,
Sharif University of Technology,
Azadi Avenue,
Tehran 11365-11155, Iran
e-mail: fvalilai@sharif.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received November 28, 2014; final manuscript received June 15, 2015; published online July 8, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Xun Xu.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(4), 040913 (Aug 01, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1640; doi: 10.1115/1.4030887 History: Received November 28, 2014; Revised June 15, 2015; Online July 08, 2015

The cloud manufacturing (C-Manufacturing) paradigm, as an advanced form of networked manufacturing, has recently been proposed based on a combination of existing manufacturing systems and emerging technologies, such as cloud computing, virtual manufacturing, agile manufacturing, manufacturing grid, Internet-of-things (IOT), and service-oriented technologies. In this study, through investigating the main goals of C-Manufacturing and today's hypercompetitive global marketplace circumstances, a prospective conceptual model called cloud-based global supply chain (CBGSC) has been developed which can overcome or mitigate the issues and risks associated with supply chain processes on a global scale. CBGSC extends the conventional three-tier customer–manufacturer–supplier supply chain model into a new five-tier customer–cloud provider of manufacturing applications (CPMA)–manufacturer–cloud provider of supplying applications (CPSA)–supplier model, in which the CPMA and CPSA tiers act as intermediators in order to enhance the diversity and intensity of the markets and businesses of conventional supply chain parties while securing their own profits. On the other hand, CBGSC enriches the notion of C-Manufacturing by incorporating CPSAs to safeguard smooth and continuous supply of raw materials and goods to manufacturers (physical resource providers), thus prevailing the “share to gain” philosophy within the whole network. Also, aiming to facilitate practicalizing the CBGSC, we have proposed a multilayer architecture for the CBGSC with seven layers of user, interface, application, service, resource virtualization and service encapsulation, perception, and resource, which are blended together via four basic aspects of security, optimality, resilience, and information technology (IT) and information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Xiao, Y. Y. E., 2006, “The Integration of International Supply Chain Management and E-Business,” Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Abdelkafi, N., Pero, M., Blecker, T., and Sianesi, S., 2011, “NPDSCM Alignment in Mass Customization,” Mass Customization Engineering and Managing Global Operations, F. S.Fogliatto and G. J. C.da Silveira, eds., Springer-Verlag, London, UK, pp. 69–85.
van Hoek, R. I., 1998, “Reconfiguring the Supply Chain to Implement Postponement Manufacturing,” Int. J. Logist. Manage., 9(1), pp. 95–110. [CrossRef]
Vidal, C. J., and Goetschackx, M., 2000, “Modelling the Effect of Uncertainties on Global Logistics Systems,” J. Bus. Logist., 21(1), pp. 95–120.
Salvador, F., Rungtusanatham, M., and Forza, C., 2004, “Supply Chain Configurations for Mass Customization,” Prod. Plann. Control, 15(4), pp. 381–397. [CrossRef]
Souza, G. C., Zhao, Z., and Chen, M., 2004, “Coordinating Sales and Raw Material Discounts in a Global Supply Chain,” Prod. Oper. Manage., 13(1), pp. 34–45. [CrossRef]
Tyagi, R., Kalish, P., Akbay, K., and Munshaw, G., 2004, “GE Plastics Optimizes the Two-Echelon Global Fulfillment Network at Its High Performance Polymers Division,” Interfaces, 34(5), pp. 359–366. [CrossRef]
Nembhard, H. B., Shi, L., and Aktan, M., 2005, “The Effect of Implementation Time Lag on Real Options Valuation,” IIE Trans., 37(10), pp. 945–956. [CrossRef]
Goh, M., Lim, J., and Meng, F., 2007, “A Stochastic Model for Risk Management in Global Supply Chain Networks,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 182(1), pp. 164–173. [CrossRef]
Creazza, A., Dallari, F., and Melacini, M., 2010, “Evaluating Logistics Network Configurations for a Global Supply Chain,” Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J., 15(2), pp.154–164. [CrossRef]
Singh, A. R., Mishra, P. K., Jain, R., and Khurana, M. K., 2012, “Design of Global Supply Chain Network With Operational Risks,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 60(1), pp. 273–290. [CrossRef]
Cruz, J. M., 2013, “Mitigating Global Supply Chain Risks Through Corporate Social Responsibility,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 51(3), pp. 3995–4010. [CrossRef]
Li, B. H., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Tao, F., Cao, J., Jiang, X., Song, X., and Chai, X., 2010, “Cloud Manufacturing: A New Service-Oriented Networked Manufacturing Model,” Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst., 16(1), pp. 1–7.
Xu, X., 2012, “From Cloud Computing to Cloud Manufacturing,” Rob. Comput. Integr. Manuf., 28(1), pp. 75–86. [CrossRef]
Zhang, L., Luo, Y., Tao, F., Li, B.-H., Ren, L., Zhang, X., Guo, H., Cheng, Y., Hu, A., and Liu, Y., 2014, “Cloud Manufacturing: A New Manufacturing Paradigm,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., 8(2), pp. 167–187. [CrossRef]
Wu, D., Greer, M. J., Rosen, D. W., and Schaefer, D., 2013, “Cloud Manufacturing: Strategic Vision and State-of-the-Art,” J. Manuf. Syst., 32(4), pp. 564–579. [CrossRef]
Tao, F., Zhang, L., Venkatesh, V. C., Luo, Y., and Cheng, Y., 2011, “Cloud Manufacturing: A Computing and Service-Oriented Manufacturing Model,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B, 225(10), pp. 1969–1976. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Prospective vision: the CBGSC model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The proposed architecture for the CBGSC

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In