Research Papers

Correlation of the Volumetric Tool Wear Rate of Carbide Milling Inserts With the Material Removal Rate of Ti–6Al–4V

[+] Author and Article Information
Mathew Kuttolamadom

Manufacturing & Mechanical Engg. Technology,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: mathew@tamu.edu

Parikshit Mehta

Dept. of Mechanical Engg.,
Clemson University,
Clemson, SC 29634
e-mail: pariksm@g.clemson.edu

Laine Mears

International Center for Automotive Research,
Clemson University,
Greenville, SC 29607
e-mail: mears@clemson.edu

Thomas Kurfess

Dept. of Mechanical Engg.,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: kurfess@gatech.edu

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 28, 2014; final manuscript received January 9, 2015; published online February 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Patrick Kwon.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(2), 021021 (Apr 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1081; doi: 10.1115/1.4029649 History: Received February 28, 2014; Revised January 09, 2015; Online February 16, 2015

The objective of this paper is to assess the correlation of volumetric tool wear (VTW) and wear rate of carbide tools on the material removal rate (MRR) of titanium alloys. A previously developed methodology for assessing the worn tool material volume is utilized for quantifying the VTW of carbide tools when machining Ti–6Al–4V. To capture the tool response, controlled milling experiments are conducted at suitable corner points of the recommended feed-speed design space, for constant stock material removal volumes. For each case, the tool material volume worn away, as well as the corresponding volumetric wear profile evolution in terms of a set of geometric coefficients, is quantified—these are then related to the MRR. Further, the volumetric wear rate and the M-ratio (volume of stock removed to VTW) which is a measure of the cutting tool efficiency, are related to the MRR—these provide a tool-life based optimal MRR for profitability. This work not only elevates tool wear from a 1D to 3D concept, but helps in assessing machining economics from a stock material-removal-efficiency perspective as well.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kuttolamadom, M. A., and Mears, M. L., 2011, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries: Need, Methodology and Validation,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2011-50278. [CrossRef]
Roth, J. T., Mears, M. L., Djurdjanovic, D., Kurfess, T. R., and Yang, X., 2007, “Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: Review of Condition Monitoring and CMM Inspection Techniques—2000 to Present,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2007-31221, pp. 861–872. [CrossRef]
ISO, 1989, “Tool Life Testing in Milling—Part 1: Face Milling, Part 2: End Milling,” Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 8688-1, ISO 8688-2.
Davim, J. P., 2008, Machining: Fundamentals and Recent Advances, Springer, New York.
Burger, U., Kuttolamadom, M. A., Bryan, A. M., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2009, “Volumetric Flank Wear Characterization for Titanium Milling Insert Tools,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2009-84256. [CrossRef]
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2005, “Quantification of Tool Wear Using White Light Interferometry and Three-Dimensional Computational Metrology,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 45(4–5), pp. 591–596. [CrossRef]
Astakhov, V. P., 2006, Tribology of Metal Cutting (Tribology and Interface Engineering Series), Elsevier, New York.
Shaw, M. C., 2004, Metal Cutting Principles, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2012, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries—Part 1: Need, Methodology and Standardization,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(5), p. 051002. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mears, M. L., Kurfess, T. R., Bryan, M. A., and Burger, U., 2012, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries—Part 2: Experimental Investigation and Validation on Ti–6Al–4V,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(5), p. 051003. [CrossRef]
Dieter, G., 1986, Mechanical Metallurgy, McGraw-Hill, New York. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Liang, S. Y., 2004, “Modeling of CBN Tool Crater Wear in Finish Hard Turning,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 24(9), pp. 632–639. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Liang, S. Y., 2004, “Modeling of CBN Tool Flank Wear Progression in Finish Hard Turning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 126(1), pp. 98–106. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Dawson, T. G., 2005, “Tool Crater Wear Depth Modeling in CBN Hard Turning,” Wear, 258(9), pp. 1455–1461. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., Chou, Y. K., and Liang, S. Y., 2007, “CBN Tool Wear in Hard Turning: A Survey on Research Progresses,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 35(1), pp. 443–453. [CrossRef]
Devillez, A., Lesko, S., and Mozer, W., 2004, “Cutting Tool Crater Wear Measurement With White Light Interferometry,” Wear, 256(1–2), pp. 56–65. [CrossRef]
Lane, B. M., Shi, M., Dow, T. A., and Scattergood, R., 2010, “Diamond Tool Wear When Machining Al6061 and 1215 Steel,” Wear, 268(11–12), pp. 1434–1441. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. H., Wong, Y. S., and Hong, G. S., 2006, “3D Measurement of Crater Wear by Phase Shifting Method,” Wear, 261(2), pp. 164–171. [CrossRef]
Avila, R. F., Godoy, C., Abrao, A. M., and Lima, M. M., 2008, “Topographic Analysis of the Crater Wear on Tin, Ti(C,N) and (Ti,Al)N Coated Carbide Tools,” Wear, 265(1–2), pp. 49–56. [CrossRef]
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2002, “Machining Hardened Steel With Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Altanta, GA.
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2006, “Modeling the Progression of Flank Wear on Uncoated and Ceramic-Coated Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride Tools in Hard Turning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 128(1), pp. 104–109. [CrossRef]
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2000, “An Investigation of Tool Wear and Surface Quality in Hard Turning,” Trans. NAMRI/SME, 200(28), pp. 215–220.
Chawla, R., and Datar, S. B., 1980, “Deduction of Flank and Crater Wear From Measurements of the Total Volumetric Wear Rates of Radioactive Tools,” Wear, 58(2), pp. 213–222. [CrossRef]
Durazo-Cardenas, I., Shore, P., Luo, X., Jacklin, T., Impey, S. A., and Cox, A., 2007, “3D Characterisation of Tool Wear Whilst Diamond Turning Silicon,” Wear, 262(3–4), pp. 340–349. [CrossRef]
Stephenson, D. A., and Agapiou, J. S., 2007, Metal Cutting Theory and Practice, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Jones, J. J., Mears, M. L., and Choragudi, A., 2010, “Investigation of the Machining of Titanium Components for Lightweight Vehicles,” SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0022. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., and Mears, M. L., 2011, “Modeling & Simulation of Tool Wear in AdvantEdge FEM When Machining Ti–6Al–4V: Challenges & Advances,” Third Wave Systems 2011 International User's Conference, Jacksonville, FL, May 25–26.
Ezugwu, E. O., and Wang, Z. M., 1997, “Titanium Alloys and Their Machinability—A Review,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 68(3), pp. 262–274. [CrossRef]
1 U.S. Dept. of Defense, 1974, “Military Handbook: Titanium and Titanium Alloys,” Washington, DC, Document No. MIL-HDBK697A.
Donachie, M. J., 2000, Titanium: A Technical Guide, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Kendall, L. A., 1994, ASM Metals Handbook: Vol. 16—Machining, Tool Wear and Tool Life, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Wright, P. K., 1984, “Physical Models of Tool Wear for Adaptive Control in Flexible Machining Cells,” Computer Integrated Manufacturing, ASME Production Engineering Division, Vol. 8, New York, pp. 19–31.
ASM, 1995, ASM Specialty Handbook: Tool Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Calamaz, M., Coupard, D., and Girot, F., 2008, “A New Material Model for 2D Numerical Simulation of Serrated Chip Formation When Machining Titanium Alloy Ti–6Al–4V,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 48(3–4), pp. 275–288. [CrossRef]
Ginting, A., and Nouari, M., 2007, “Optimal Cutting Conditions When Dry End Milling the Aeroengine Material Ti-6242s,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 184(1–3), pp. 319–324. [CrossRef]
Komanduri, R., 1982, “Some Clarifications on the Mechanics of Chip Formation When Machining Titanium Alloys,” Wear, 76(1), pp. 15–34. [CrossRef]
Colding, B., and Konig, W., 1971, “Validity of the Taylor Equation in Metal Cutting,” Ann. CIRP, 19(4), pp. 793–812.
Obikawa, T., and Usui, E., 1996, “Computational Machining of Titanium Alloy—Finite Element Modeling and a Few Results,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 118(2), pp. 208–215. [CrossRef]
Umbrello, D., 2008, “Finite Element Simulation of Conventional and High Speed Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 196(1–3), pp. 79–87. [CrossRef]
Wang, Z. G., Rahman, M., Wong, Y. S., and Li, X. P., 2005, “A Hybrid Cutting Force Model for High-Speed Milling of Titanium Alloys,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 54(1), pp. 71–74. [CrossRef]
Zoya, Z. A., and Krishnamurthy, R., 2000, “The Performance of CBN Tools in the Machining of Titanium Alloys,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 100(1–3), pp. 80–86. [CrossRef]
Li, R., and Shih, A. J., 2006, “Finite Element Modeling of 3D Turning of Titanium,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 29(3), pp. 253–261. [CrossRef]
Che-Haron, C. H., 2001, “Tool Life and Surface Integrity in Turning Titanium Alloy,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 118(1–3), pp. 231–237. [CrossRef]
Nouari, M., and Ginting, A., 2006, “Wear Characteristics and Performance of Multi-Layer CVD-Coated Alloyed Carbide Tool in Dry End Milling of Titanium Alloy,” Surf. Coat. Technol., 200(18–19), pp. 5663–5676. [CrossRef]
Sun, J., and Guo, Y., 2009, “Material Flow Stress and Failure in Multiscale Machining Titanium Alloy Ti–6Al–4V,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 41(7), pp. 651–659. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2015, “The Correlation of the Volumetric Wear Rate of Turning Tool Inserts With Carbide Grain Sizes,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 137(1), p. 011015. [CrossRef]
Kuo, H., Meyer, K., Lindle, R., and Ni, J., 2012, “Estimation of Milling Tool Temperature Considering Coolant and Wear,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(3), p. 031002. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

An inconsistent wear quantification scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

General VTW procedure for a new tool: (a) reference entities shown on tool, (b) point-cloud 3D model, (c) point-cloud in rectangular coordinates, (d) truncated surface model, (e) four bounding planes created off reference entities for cordoning tool body, and (f) 3D solid model of the volumetric region of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Volumetric wear vs. increasing feeds and speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The correlation of VTW with MRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

High feed–low speed resulting chatter marks visible on a turned Ti–6Al–4V workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The correlation of specific VTW rate with MRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dependence of accumulated wear on VTW rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Geometric coefficients defined on flank face plane for wear tracking: (a) intensity map and (b) 3D model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Geometric coefficient defined into the tool body for wear tracking: (a) 3D model and (b) surface profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evolution of the average of the set of geometric coefficients for each pass

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The correlation of the M-ratio with MRR




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In