Research Papers

Correlation of the Volumetric Tool Wear Rate of Carbide Milling Inserts With the Material Removal Rate of Ti–6Al–4V

[+] Author and Article Information
Mathew Kuttolamadom

Manufacturing & Mechanical Engg. Technology,
Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
e-mail: mathew@tamu.edu

Parikshit Mehta

Dept. of Mechanical Engg.,
Clemson University,
Clemson, SC 29634
e-mail: pariksm@g.clemson.edu

Laine Mears

International Center for Automotive Research,
Clemson University,
Greenville, SC 29607
e-mail: mears@clemson.edu

Thomas Kurfess

Dept. of Mechanical Engg.,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: kurfess@gatech.edu

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received February 28, 2014; final manuscript received January 9, 2015; published online February 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Patrick Kwon.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(2), 021021 (Apr 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1081; doi: 10.1115/1.4029649 History: Received February 28, 2014; Revised January 09, 2015; Online February 16, 2015

The objective of this paper is to assess the correlation of volumetric tool wear (VTW) and wear rate of carbide tools on the material removal rate (MRR) of titanium alloys. A previously developed methodology for assessing the worn tool material volume is utilized for quantifying the VTW of carbide tools when machining Ti–6Al–4V. To capture the tool response, controlled milling experiments are conducted at suitable corner points of the recommended feed-speed design space, for constant stock material removal volumes. For each case, the tool material volume worn away, as well as the corresponding volumetric wear profile evolution in terms of a set of geometric coefficients, is quantified—these are then related to the MRR. Further, the volumetric wear rate and the M-ratio (volume of stock removed to VTW) which is a measure of the cutting tool efficiency, are related to the MRR—these provide a tool-life based optimal MRR for profitability. This work not only elevates tool wear from a 1D to 3D concept, but helps in assessing machining economics from a stock material-removal-efficiency perspective as well.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

An inconsistent wear quantification scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

General VTW procedure for a new tool: (a) reference entities shown on tool, (b) point-cloud 3D model, (c) point-cloud in rectangular coordinates, (d) truncated surface model, (e) four bounding planes created off reference entities for cordoning tool body, and (f) 3D solid model of the volumetric region of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Volumetric wear vs. increasing feeds and speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The correlation of VTW with MRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

High feed–low speed resulting chatter marks visible on a turned Ti–6Al–4V workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The correlation of specific VTW rate with MRR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dependence of accumulated wear on VTW rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Geometric coefficients defined on flank face plane for wear tracking: (a) intensity map and (b) 3D model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Geometric coefficient defined into the tool body for wear tracking: (a) 3D model and (b) surface profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evolution of the average of the set of geometric coefficients for each pass

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The correlation of the M-ratio with MRR




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In