0
Research Papers

Rapid Computation of Statistically Stable Particle/Feature Ratios for Consistent Substrate Stresses in Printed Flexible Electronics

[+] Author and Article Information
T. I. Zohdi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of California,
Berkeley, CA 94720-1740

The Poisson ratio was set to ν = 0.3.

L scaled out of the results and was irrelevant.

We note that the quantity $σ':σ'$ is invariant under the rotational coordinate transformation, in other words, $σ',car:σ',car=(RT(θ)·σ',cyl·R(θ))T:(RT(θ)·σ',cyl· R(θ))=σ',cyl:σ',cyl$, thus this metric remains perfectly acceptable to use in the presence of non-normal loading.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received September 16, 2014; final manuscript received December 5, 2014; published online February 4, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Donggang Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(2), 021019 (Apr 01, 2015) (5 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1476; doi: 10.1115/1.4029327 History: Received September 16, 2014; Revised December 05, 2014; Online February 04, 2015

Abstract

This paper develops a statistically based computational method to rapidly determine stresses in flexible substrates during particle printing processes. Specifically, substrate stresses due to multiple surface particle contact sites are statistically computed by superposing point load solutions for different random particle realizations (sets of random loading sites) within a fixed feature boundary. The approach allows an analyst to rapidly determine the number of particles in a surface feature needed to produce repeatable substrate stresses, thus minimizing the deviation from feature to feature and ensuring consistent production. Three-dimensional examples are provided to illustrate the technique. The utility of the approach is that an analyst can efficiently ascertain the number of particles needed within a feature, without resorting to computationally intensive numerical procedures, such as the finite element method.

<>

References

Gamota, D., Brazis, P., Kalyanasundaram, K., and Zhang, J., 2004, Printed Organic and Molecular Electronics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
Nakanishi, H., Bishop, K. J. M., Kowalczyk, B., Nitzan, A., Weiss, E. A., Tretiakov, K. V., Apodaca, M. M., Klajn, R., Stoddart, J. F., and Grzybowski, B. A., 2009, “Photoconductance and Inverse Photoconductance in Thin Films of Functionalized Metal Nanoparticles,” Nature, 460, pp. 371–375. [PubMed]
Fuller, S. B., Wilhelm, E. J., and Jacobson, J. M., 2002, “Ink-Jet Printed Nanoparticle Microelectromechanical Systems,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 11(1), pp. 54–60.
Samarasinghe, S. R., Pastoriza-Santos, I., Edirisinghe, M. J., Reece, M. J., and Liz-Marzan, L. M., 2006, “Printing Gold Nanoparticles With an Electrohydrodynamic Direct Write Device,” Gold Bull., 39(2), pp. 48–53.
Ahmad, Z., Rasekh, M., and Edirisinghe, M., 2010, “Electrohydrodynamic Direct Writing of Biomedical Polymers and Composites,” Macromol. Mater. Eng., 295(4), pp. 315–319.
Sirringhaus, H., Kawase, T., Friend, R. H., Shimoda, T., Inbasekaran, M., Wu, W., and Woo, E. P., 2000, “High-Resolution Inkjet Printing of All-Polymer Transistor Circuits,” Science, 290(5499), pp. 2123–2126. [PubMed]
Wang, J. Z., Zheng, Z. H., Li, H. W., Huck, W. T. S., and Sirringhaus, H., 2004, “Dewetting of Conducting Polymer Inkjet Droplets on Patterned Surfaces,” Nat. Mater., 3, pp. 171–176. [PubMed]
Huang, D., Liao, F., Molesa, S., Redinger, D., and Subramanian, V., 2003, “Plastic-Compatible Low-Resistance Printable Gold Nanoparticle Conductors for Flexible Electronics,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 150(7), pp. G412–G417.
Choi, S., Park, I., Hao, Z., Holman, H. Y., Pisano, A. P., and Zohdi, T. I., 2010, “Ultra-Fast Self-Assembly of Micro-Scale Particles by Open Channel Flow,” Langmuir, 26(7), pp. 4661–4667. [PubMed]
Choi, S., Stassi, S., Pisano, A. P., and Zohdi, T. I., 2010, “Coffee-Ring Effect-Based Three Dimensional Patterning of Micro, Nanoparticle Assembly With a Single Droplet,” Langmuir, 26(14), pp. 11690–11698. [PubMed]
Choi, S., Jamshidi, A., Seok, T. J., Zohdi, T. I., Wu, M. C., and Pisano, A. P., 2012, “Fast, High-Throughput Creation of Size-Tunable Micro, Nanoparticle Clusters Via Evaporative Self-Assembly in Picoliter-Scale Droplets of Particle Suspension,” Langmuir, 28(6), pp. 3102–3111. [PubMed]
Choi, S., Pisano, A. P., and Zohdi, T. I., 2013, “An Analysis of Evaporative Self-Assembly of Micro Particles in Printed Picoliter Suspension Droplets,” J. Thin Solid Films, 537(30), pp. 180–189.
Demko, M., Choi, S., Zohdi, T. I., and Pisano, A. P., 2012, “High Resolution Patterning of Nanoparticles by Evaporative Self-Assembly Enabled by In-Situ Creation and Mechanical Lift-Off of a Polymer Template,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 99(25), p. 253102.
Demko, M. T., Cheng, J. C., and Pisano, A. P., 2010, “High-Resolution Direct Patterning of Gold Nanoparticles by the Microfluidic Molding Process,” Langmuir, 26(22), pp. 16710–16714. [PubMed]
Fathi, S., Dickens, P., Khodabakhshi, K., and Gilbert, M., 2013, “Microcrystal Particles Behaviour in Inkjet Printing of Reactive Nylon Materials,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 135(1), p. 011009.
Martin, P., 2009, Handbook of Deposition Technologies for Films and Coatings, 3rd ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martin, P., 2011, “Introduction to Surface Engineering and Functionally Engineered Materials,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A2(2), p. 500.
Duran, J., 1997, Sands, Powders and Grains—An Introduction to the Physics of Granular Matter, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
Zohdi, T. I., 2003, “Genetic Design of Solids Possessing a Random-Particulate Microstructure,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 361(1806), pp. 1021–1043.
Zohdi, T. I., 2003, “On the compaction of Cohesive Hyperelastic Granules at Finite Strains,” Proc. R. Soc., 454(2034), pp. 1395–1401.
Zohdi, T. I., 2004, “A Computational Framework for Agglomeration in Thermo-Chemically Reacting Granular Flows,” Proc. R. Soc., 460(2052), pp. 3421–3445.
Zohdi, T. I., 2012, “Estimation of Electrical-Heating Load-Shares for Sintering of Powder Mixtures,” Proc. R. Soc., 468(2144), pp. 2174–2190.
Zohdi, T. I., 2012, Dynamics of Charged Particulate Systems: Modeling, Theory and Computation, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
Zohdi, T. I., 2013, “Numerical Simulation of Charged Particulate Cluster-Droplet Impact on Electrified Surfaces,” J. Comput. Phys., 233, pp. 509–526.
Zohdi, T. I., 2014, “A Direct Particle-Based Computational Framework for Electrically-Enhanced Thermo-Mechanical Sintering of Powdered Materials,” Math. Mech. Solids, 19(1), pp. 93–113.
Boussinesq, J., 1885, Application des Potentials a l’ etude de l’ equilibre et du mouvement des solides elastiques, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France, Vol. 45, p. 108.
Johnson, K., 1985, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Kachanov, M., Shafiro, B., and Tsukrov, I., 2003, Handbook of Elasticity Solutions, Kluwer, Springer, Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.

Figures

Fig. 1

Placing particles into a surface and applying pressure to properly bond them to the substrate

Fig. 2

Left: a single particle; middle: a set of particles on the surface under loading; and right: the stress intensity

Fig. 3

The algorithm for computation of statistically stable particle/feature resolution

Fig. 4

LEFT: Three feature examples tested: (a) a solid circular pattern, (b) a ring pattern, and (c) a figure 8 pattern. RIGHT: two random realizations (sets of loading sites) from the 100 tested for each N-set.

Fig. 5

Example 1—solid circle (with surface area of As = π(0.15L)2): overall quality metrics (the average, δN,M and the standard deviation, δN,M) as a function of the number of particles in the feature (for an applied unit load Fz = 1). Results are shown for the deviatoric stresses (σ') and the total stresses (σ). We note that the number of particles in the area should be interpreted as number of loading sites in the feature boundary.

Fig. 6

Example 2—ring (with surface area of As = π((0.15L)2 - (0.1L)2)): overall quality metrics (the average, δN,M and the standard deviation, δN,M) as a function of the number of loading sites in the feature (for an applied unit load Fz = 1). Results are shown for the deviatoric stresses (σ') and the total stresses (σ). We note that the number of particles in the area should be interpreted as number of loading sites in the feature boundary.

Fig. 7

Example 3—figure 8 (with surface area of As = 2π((0.15L)2 - (0.1L)2)): overall quality metrics (the average, αN,M and the standard deviation, δN,M) as a function of the number of particles in the feature (for an applied unit load Fz = 1). Results are shown for the deviatoric stresses (σ') and the total stresses (σ). We note that the number of particles in the area should be interpreted as number of loading sites in the feature boundary.

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related Proceedings Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections