0
Research Papers

Formulation of Influence of Machine Geometric Errors on Five-Axis On-Machine Scanning Measurement by Using a Laser Displacement Sensor

[+] Author and Article Information
Soichi Ibaraki

Department of Micro Engineering,
Kyoto University, Katsura, Nishigyo-ku,
Kyoto 615-8530, Japan
e-mail: ibaraki@prec.kyoto-u.ac.jp

Yoshihiro Kimura, Yu Nagai

Department of Micro Engineering,
Kyoto University Katsura, Nishigyo-ku,
Kyoto 615-8530, Japan

Shizuo Nishikawa

DMG Mori Seiki, Co., Ltd., Meieki 2-35-16,
Nakamura-ku, Nagoya 450-0002, Japan

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received July 14, 2013; final manuscript received November 11, 2014; published online December 18, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Eric R. Marsh.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(2), 021013 (Apr 01, 2015) (11 pages) Paper No: MANU-13-1277; doi: 10.1115/1.4029183 History: Received July 14, 2013; Revised November 11, 2014; Online December 18, 2014

For on-machine measurement of workpiece position, orientation, and geometry on machine tools, five-axis continuous (scanning) measurement by using a laser displacement sensor has a strong advantage in its efficiency, compared to conventional discrete measurement using a touch-triggered contact probe. In any on-machine measurement schemes, major contributors to their measurement uncertainty are error motions of the machine tool itself. This paper formulates the influence of geometric errors of rotary axis average lines on the measurement uncertainty of the five-axis on-machine measurement by using a laser displacement sensor. To validate the present simulator, experimental comparison of measured and simulated trajectories is conducted on five-axis on-machine measurement of a precision sphere of the precalibrated geometry. For total 28 paths measured on the spherical surface, an error in the simulated trajectories from measured trajectories (properly low-pass filtered) was at maximum 5 μm. Uncertainty assessment demonstration for more practical application example of a turbine blade measurement is also presented.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Five-axis scanning measurement for higher measurement efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Measuring principle of triangulation-based laser displacement sensor based on diffuse reflection

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Machine configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Laser displacement sensor setup to measure the light spot position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Coordinate transformation from machine coordinate system to workpiece coordinate system; (a) in machine coordinate system; (b) in workpiece coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Scanning operation of sphere to measure its center position

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Calibration procedure of direction vector of laser beam, t

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Calibration procedure of sensor's zero position vector, l

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Experimental setup (at B=0deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Measured light spot path parameterized by β (α=0deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Laser direction on the measured path

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Command X, Y, Z, B, and C trajectories in machine coordinate system for the path α=0deg and β=80deg (forward and backward); (a) X, Y, and Z trajectories; (b) B and C trajectories

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

R-test procedure by using the laser measurement system; (a) at B=0deg; (b) at various B angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Measurement trajectories in workpiece coordinate system for β=0,40,80,90,100,140,180deg and α=0deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Measurement and simulated trajectories projected onto the plane containing the command path; (a) β=0deg, (b) β=40deg, (c) β=90deg, (d) β=100deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Nominal geometry of turbine blade to be simulated

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Measurement setup for the turbine blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Simulated trajectories of the blade's cross section at z = 60 mm under geometric errors in Table 5; (a) when the test piece is installed at the position shown in Fig. 16, (b) when its Z-position is 40 mm higher

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In