0
Research Papers

Finite Element Simulation of Localized Electrochemical Deposition for Maskless Electrochemical Additive Manufacturing

[+] Author and Article Information
Anne M. Brant

Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
OH 45221-0072
e-mail: brantam@mail.uc.edu

Murali M. Sundaram

Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
OH 45221-0072
e-mail: murali.sundaram@uc.edu

Abishek B. Kamaraj

Department of Mechanical
and Materials Engineering,
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati,
OH 45221-0072
e-mail: balsamak@mail.uc.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 15, 2014; final manuscript received July 31, 2014; published online November 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Darrell Wallace.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(1), 011018 (Feb 01, 2015) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1208; doi: 10.1115/1.4028198 History: Received April 15, 2014; Revised July 31, 2014; Online November 26, 2014

Localized electrodeposition (LED) was explored as an additive manufacturing technique with high control over process parameters and output geometry. The effect of variation of process parameters and changing boundary conditions during the deposition process on the output geometry was observed through simulation and experimentation. Trends were found between specific process parameters and output geometries in the simulations; trends varied between linear and nonlinear, and certain process parameters such as voltage and interelectrode gap were found to have a greater influence on the output than others. The simulations were able to predict the output width of deposition of experiments in an error of 8–30%. The information gained from this research allows for greater understanding of LED output, so that it can potentially be applied as an additive manufacturing technique of complex three-dimensional (3D) parts on the microscale.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Summary of electrodeposition simulation process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Modeling method and input parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Element death algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Final result imported into Matlab with extracted output dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effects of varying tool width

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effects of varying tool width to gap ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of effects due to varying tool width and width to gap ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Effects of varying applied tool voltage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Effects of varying electrolyte concentration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effects of varying duty cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Superposition of simulation and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Comparison of trends seen in simulation and experiments

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In