0
Research Papers

The Correlation of the Volumetric Wear Rate of Turning Tool Inserts With Carbide Grain Sizes

[+] Author and Article Information
Mathew A. Kuttolamadom

Texas A&M University,
College Station, TX 77843
email: mathew@tamu.edu

M. Laine Mears

Clemson University—International Center for Automotive Research,
Greenville, SC 29607 email: mears@clemson.edu

Thomas R. Kurfess

Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
email: kurfess@gatech.edu

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received March 12, 2014; final manuscript received July 24, 2014; published online November 26, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Z. J. Pei.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 137(1), 011015 (Feb 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: MANU-14-1110; doi: 10.1115/1.4028129 History: Received March 12, 2014; Revised July 24, 2014; Online November 26, 2014

The objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of different carbide grain sizes on the tool material volume worn away from straight tungsten–carbide–cobalt (WC–Co) turning inserts. A previously developed metrology method for assessing the tool material volume worn away from milling inserts is adapted for quantifying the volumetric tool wear (VTW) of turning inserts. Controlled turning experiments are conducted at suitable points in the feed-speed design space for two sets of uncoated inserts having different carbide grain sizes. Three levels of Ti–6Al–4V stock removal volumes (10-cm3 each) are analyzed. For each insert, the tool material volume worn away (in mm3) as well as the three-dimensional (3D) wear profile evolution is quantified after each run. Further, the specific volumetric wear rate and the M-ratio (volume of stock removed to VTW) are related to the material removal rate (MRR). The effect of carbide grain size on VTW is examined using scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis. Finally, the inverse dependence of the M-ratio on MRR enables the definition of actual usable tool life in terms of its efficiency in removing stock, rather than being based on a tool geometry related metric.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Topics: Wear , Grain size , Milling , Turning
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kuttolamadom, M. A., 2012, “Prediction of the Wear & Evolution of Cutting Tools in a Carbide/Ti–6Al–4V Machining Tribosystem by Volumetric Tool Wear Characterization & Modeling,” Ph.D. thesis, Clemson University, Clemson, SC.
Konig, W., 1979, “Applied Research on the Machinability of Titanium and Its Alloys,” Proceedings of the 47th AGARD Conference, Structural & Materials Panel: Advanced Fabrication Processes, Florence, Italy, September 26–28.
Schrock, D. J., Kang, D., Bieler, T. R., and Kwon, P., 2014, “Phase Dependent Tool Wear in Turning Ti–6Al–4V Using Polycrystalline Diamond and Carbide Inserts,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(4), p. 041018. [CrossRef]
Upadhyaya, G. S., 1998, Cemented Tungsten Carbides—Production, Properties, and Testing, William Andrew Publishing, Burlington, MA.
Upadhyaya, G. S., 2001, “Materials Science of Cemented Carbides—A Overview,” Mater. Des., 22(6), pp. 483–489. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., and Mears, M. L., 2011, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries: Need, Methodology & Validation (MSEC2011-50278),” ASME Proceedings of the International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Corvallis, OR, June 13–17, Vol. 2, pp. 313–322.
International Standards Organization, 1989, “Tool Life Testing in Milling—Part 1: Face Milling, Part 2: End Milling ISO 8688-1,” ISO 8688-2, Geneva, Switzerland.
International Standards Organization, 1993, “Tool Life Testing With Single-Point Turning Tools,” ISO-3685, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mehta, P., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2012, “The Correlation of Volumetric Tool Wear & Wear Rate of Machining Tools With the Material Removal Rate of Titanium Alloys,” ASME Proceedings of the International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Notre Dame, IN, June 4–8, ASME Paper No. MSEC2012-7338, pp. 387–396. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2012, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries—Part 1: Need, Methodology and Standardization,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(5), p. 051002. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mears, M. L., Kurfess, T. R., Bryan, M. A., and Burger, U., 2012, “On the Volumetric Assessment of Tool Wear in Machining Inserts With Complex Geometries—Part 2: Experimental Investigation and Validation on Ti–6Al–4V,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(5), p. 051003. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Liang, S. Y., 2004, “Modeling of CBN Tool Crater Wear in Finish Hard Turning,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 24(9), pp. 632–639. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Liang, S. Y., 2004, “Modeling of CBN Tool Flank Wear Progression in Finish Hard Turning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 126(1), pp. 98–106. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., and Dawson, T. G., 2005, “Tool Crater Wear Depth Modeling in CBN Hard Turning,” Wear, 258(9), pp. 1455–1461. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y., Chou, C., and Liang, S. Y., 2007, “CBN Tool Wear in Hard Turning: A Survey on Research Progresses,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 35(5–6), pp. 443–453. [CrossRef]
Devillez, A., Lesko, S., and Mozer, W., 2004, “Cutting Tool Crater Wear Measurement With White Light Interferometry,” Wear, 256(1–2), pp. 56–65. [CrossRef]
Lane, B. M., Shi, M., Dow, T. A., and Scattergood, R., 2010, “Diamond Tool Wear When Machining Al6061 and 1215 Steel,” Wear, 268(11–12), pp. 1434–1441. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. H., Wong, Y. S., and Hong, G. S., 2006, “3D Measurement of Crater Wear by Phase Shifting Method,” Wear, 261(2), pp. 164–171. [CrossRef]
Avila, R. F., Godoy, C., Abrao, A. M., and Lima, M. M., 2008, “Topographic Analysis of the Crater Wear on TiN, Ti(C,N) and (Ti,Al) N Coated Carbide Tools,” Wear, 265(1–2), pp. 49–56. [CrossRef]
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2002, “Machining Hardened Steel With Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Altanta, GA.
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2006, “Modeling the Progression of Flank Wear on Uncoated and Ceramic-Coated Polycrystalline Cubic Boron Nitride Tools in Hard Turning,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 128(1), pp. 104–109. [CrossRef]
Dawson, T. G., and Kurfess, T. R., 2000, “An Investigation of Tool Wear and Surface Quality in Hard Turning,” Trans. NAMRI/SME 200, 28, pp. 215–220.
Chawla, R., and Datar, S. B., 1980, “Deduction of Flank and Crater Wear From Measurements of the Total Volumetric Wear Rates of Radioactive Tools,” Wear, 58(2), pp. 213–222. [CrossRef]
Durazo-Cardenas, I., Shore, P., Luo, X., Jacklin, T., Impey, S. A., and Cox, A., 2007, “3D Characterisation of Tool Wear Whilst Diamond Turning Silicon,” Wear, 262(3–4), pp. 340–349. [CrossRef]
Stephenson, D. A., and Agapiou, J. S., 2007, Metal Cutting Theory and Practice, CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
Burger, U., Kuttolamadom, M. A., Bryan, A. M., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2009, “Volumetric Flank Wear Characterization for Titanium Milling Insert Tools,” ASME Paper No. MSEC2009-84256. [CrossRef]
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Jones, J. J., Mears, M. L., and Choragudi, A., 2010, “Investigation of the Machining of Titanium Components for Lightweight Vehicles,” SAE 2010 World Congress, Detroit, MI, SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0022.
Kuttolamadom, M. A., and Mears, M. L., 2011, “Modeling and Simulation of Tool Wear in AdvantEdge FEM When Machining Ti–6Al–4V: Challenges and Advances,” 10th Annual Third Wave Systems 2011 International User's Conference, Jacksonville, FL, May 25–26.
ASM, 1995, ASM Specialty Handbook: Tool Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Donachie, M. J., 2000, Titanium: A Technical Guide, ASM International, Materials Park, OH.
Callister, W. D., 2007, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Askeland, P., 2003, Science and Engineering of Materials, Nelson Thornes, Cheltenham, Great Britain.
Wang, X., and Kwon, P. Y., 2014, “WC/Co Tool Wear in Dry Turning of Commercially Pure Aluminium,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 136(3), p. 031006. [CrossRef]
Hall, E. O., 1951, “The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results,” Proc. Phys. Soc., Ser. B, 64(9), pp. 747–753. [CrossRef]
Petch, N. J., 1953, “The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals”, J. Iron Steel Inst., London, Vol. 173, pp. 25–28.
Kuttolamadom, M. A., Mazgaonkar, N., Mears, M. L., and Kurfess, T. R., 2013, “Adaptation of the Volumetric Wear Metrology for Turning Tool Inserts,” Presented at the International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Madison, WI, June 10–14, ASME Paper No. MSEC2013-1275.
International Standards Organization, 1975, ISO 3326: Hardmetals—Determination of (the Magnetization) Coercivity, ISO, Geneva, Switzerland.
ASTM, 2008, ASTM B887: Standard Test Method for Determination of Coercivity (Hcs) of Cemented Carbides, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

An inconsistent wear quantification scenario [8]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Adaptation of the VTW metrology for turning inserts: (a) worn turning tool surface, (b) point cloud data, (c) 3D point-cloud model of worn crater, (d) parametric surface model, and (e) sectioned model of the 3D region of interest

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(Identical) cutting edge and geometry of the two selected types of turning tool inserts [39]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Final machined workpieces used for the turning experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

VTW of H10A and H13A grade inserts at a feed rate of (a) 0.05 mm/rev, (b) 0.15 mm/rev, and (c) 0.30 mm/rev for different cutting speeds. Note that in (c), the data points for a cutting speed of 120 m/min is not shown due to catastrophic failure of the turning tool inserts.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Plot of specific VTW as a function of MRR for H10A grade (with second order polynomial fits)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Plot of specific VTW as a function of MRR for H13A grade (with second order polynomial fits)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Chatter marks resulting from high feed–low speed process condition on turned Ti–6Al–4V stock

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Plot of specific VTW rate (per minute of stock removal) as a function of increasing MRR for H10A grade inserts (with linear curve fits)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Plot of specific VTW rate (per minute of stock removal) as a function of increasing MRR for H13A grade inserts (with linear curve fits)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Plot of specific M-ratio (per 10-cm3 of stock removal) against MRR for H10A grade inserts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Plot of specific M-ratio (per 10-cm3 of stock removal) against MRR for H13A grade inserts

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In