Research Papers

Spot Weld Layout Optimization of Tube Crash Performance With Manufacturing Constraints

[+] Author and Article Information
Qing Zhou

e-mail: zhouqing@tsinghua.edu.cn

Xueyuan Wu

e-mail: xy-wu04@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

Yong Xia

e-mail: xiayong@tsinghua.edu.cn

State Key Laboratory of Automotive
Safety and Energy,
Department of Automotive Engineering,
Tsinghua University,
Beijing 100084, China

Wayne Cai

Manufacturing Systems Research Laboratory,
General Motors Global R&D Center,
Warren, MI 48098
e-mail: wayne.cai@gm.com

Manuscript received November 22, 2012; final manuscript received September 24, 2013; published online December 30, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Jyhwen Wang.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 136(1), 011014 (Dec 30, 2013) (10 pages) Paper No: MANU-12-1343; doi: 10.1115/1.4025811 History: Received November 22, 2012; Revised September 24, 2013

Spot weld layout is critical to structural performance of vehicle and its design is also subject to manufacturing constraints. In this study, using thin-walled tube crash as an example, we establish the relation between structural performance and weld layout design with manufacturing constraints from resistance spot welding. First, a straight tube crash performance is evaluated as a function of flange width, weld distance to flange corner, and weld pitch, without consideration of manufacturing constraints. All these parameters exhibit certain influence on the deformation mode and the energy absorption capacity. Then, an S-shaped tube is studied in the design optimization of weld layout by adding manufacturing constraints. The proposed approach can determine optimized results by simultaneously considering crash performance and manufacturing constraints. It is also concluded that weld layout has more significant influence on crash performance in straight tubes than in S-shaped tubes.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kurtaran, H., Eskandarian, A., Marzougui, D., and Bedewi, N. E., 2002, “Crashworthiness Design Optimization Using Successive Response Surface Approximations,” Comput. Mech., 29, pp. 409–421. [CrossRef]
Avalle, M., Chiandussi, G., and Belingardi, G., 2002, “Design Optimization by Response Surface Methodology: Application to Crashworthiness Design of Vehicle Structures,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 24, pp. 325–332. [CrossRef]
Youn, B. D., Choi, K. K., Yang, R. J., and Gu, L., 2003, “Reliability-Based Design Optimization for Crashworthiness of Vehicle Side Impact,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 25, pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Gu, L., Yang, R. J., Li, G., and Tyan, T., 2004, “Vehicle Structure Optimization for Crash Pulse,” DETC2004/DAC-57479, Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT, Sept. 28–Oct. 2.
Hamza, K., and Saitou, K., 2005, “Design Optimization of Vehicle Structures for Crashworthiness Using Equivalent Mechanism Approximations,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 127, pp. 485–492. [CrossRef]
Yang, R. J., Rui, Y., Mohammed, A., and Singh, G., 1996, “Spot Weld/Adhesive Pattern Optimization,” Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, CA.
Zhang, Y., and Taylor, D., 2001, “Optimization of Spot-welded Structures,” Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 37, pp. 1013–1022. [CrossRef]
Xiang, Y., Wang, Q., Fan, Z., and Fang, H., 2006, “Optimal Crashworthiness Design of a Spot-Welded Thin-Walled Hat Section,” Finite Elem. Anal. Design, 42, pp. 846–855. [CrossRef]
White, M. D., and Jones, N., 1999, “Experimental Quasi-Static Axial Crushing of Top-Hat and Double-Hat Thin-Walled Sections,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 41, pp. 179–208. [CrossRef]
White, M. D., Jones, N., and Abramowicz, W., 1999, “A Theoretical Analysis for the Quasi-Static Axial Crushing of Top-Hat and Double-Hat Thin-Walled Sections,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 41, pp. 209–233. [CrossRef]
White, M. D., and Jones, N., 1999, “A Theoretical Analysis for the Dynamic Axial Crushing of Top-Hat Thin Walled Sections,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part D (J. Automob. Eng.), 213, pp. 307–325. [CrossRef]
Schneider, F., and Jones, N., 2003, “Influence of Spot-Weld Failure on Crushing of Thin-Walled Structural Sections,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 45, pp. 2061–2081. [CrossRef]
Schneider, F., and Jones, N., 2008, “Observations on the Design and Modelling of Some Joined Thin-Walled Structural Sections,” Thin-Walled Struct., 46, pp. 887–897. [CrossRef]
Wierzbicki, T., and Abramowicz, W., 1983, “On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures,” J. Appl. Mech., 50, pp. 727–734. [CrossRef]
Wierzbicki, T., and Abramowicz, W., 1988, “Manual of Crashworthiness Engineering, Stability of Progressive Collapse,” Center for Transportation Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Vol. 8.
Cai, W., TiloveR., and Shastry, G., 2011, “Method of Optimizing Weld Design for Concurrent Consideration of Performance and Manufacturing Requirements,” U.S. Patent No. 8,032,343.
Gupta, A., Shastry, G., Hunsur, N. K., Cai, W., and Tilove, R., 2012, “An Approach for Automated and Optimized Selection of Weldguns for Spot Welding in Automotive Body Shop,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134, p. 034501. [CrossRef]
Wu, X., Xia, Y., Zhou, Q., Cai, W., and Tilove, R., 2010, “Spot Weld Layout Optimization With Manufacturing Constraints for Vehicle Structural Performance,” Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Nov. 12–18, Paper Number IMECE2010-40376.
LS-OPTUser's Manual, Version 4.0, 2009, Livermore Software Technology Corporation.
NHTSA Finite Element Model Archive, 2006,  Dodge Neon, Detailed model (272,485 elements), http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Model of top-hat tube with superfolding elements [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cross section and boundary conditions of the top-hat tube in the study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The stress-strain curves of the material (with four different strain rates)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Deformation at t = 35 ms for cases (I), (II), and (III) (the top figures are side view from −X  to  +X direction, the bottom figures are front view from +Y  to  −Y direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Deformation on flange for cases (I), (II) and (III) (flange panel: view from +Y  to −Y direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Energy absorption of the cases with the three flange widths

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematics of four cases with different weld distances to flange corner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Deformation modes at t = 40 ms with different weld distances to flange corner (view from −X  to  +X direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Flange deformation arrested by the spot welds placed close to the flange corner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Local deformation on the flange for case (d) at t = 6.2 ms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Energy absorption for the cases with the four weld distances to the flange corner

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Deformation results for group (A) (at t = 35 ms, view from −X  to  +X direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Energy absorption under different weld pitches for group (A)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Deformation results for group (B) (at t = 35 ms, view from −X  to  +X direction)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Several typical manufacturing constraints for spot welding

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

S-shaped tube structure for optimization case studies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Stress–strain curves with different strain rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Design spaces for cases (1) and (2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 22

Curvature constraint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 23

Tubes for evaluating the influence of weld layouts

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 24

Influence of weld locations




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In