0
Research Papers

Finite Element Simulation of Process Control for Bolt Tightening in Joints With Nonparallel Contact

[+] Author and Article Information
Saravanan Ganeshmurthy

Fastening and Joining Research Institute,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309

Sayed A. Nassar

Fellow ASME
Fastening and Joining Research Institute,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Oakland University,
Rochester, MI 48309

1Corresponding author.

Manuscript received August 30, 2012; final manuscript received May 13, 2013; published online February 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Donggang Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 136(2), 021018 (Feb 24, 2014) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-12-1258; doi: 10.1115/1.4025830 History: Received August 30, 2012; Revised May 13, 2013

In this paper, 3D finite element analysis (FEA) is used to simulate and evaluate different process control methods that are commonly used for automating the assembly of bolted joints in a mass production environment. The finite element (FE) model takes into account the thread helix angle of a fastener along with parallel and nonparallel contact surfaces under the bolt head. Simulation includes the torque-only and the torque-turn process control methods for achieving a desired level of the bolt preload at initial assembly of the joint. The torque-only process control option is simulated by applying the target torque at which the tightening process is automatically stopped. On the other hand, a torque-turn or torque-angle method is simulated by first applying a low level (threshold) torque, to the bolt head, followed by turning the bolt head by a specified angle of turn in order to achieve the desired bolt tension. The effect of variables such as thread and underhead bearing friction coefficients and bolt hole clearance is investigated. The FEA simulation provided in this study would be helpful in developing a reliable tightening strategy for joints with nonparallel bearing surfaces.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Bickford, J. H., 1997, An Introduction to the Design and Analysis of Bolted Joints, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York.
Bickford, J. H., and Nassar, S. A., 1998, Handbook of Bolts and Bolted Joints, Marcel Dekker, New York.
Juvinall, R. C., and Marshek, K. M., 2000, Fundamental of Machine Component Design, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Motosh, N., 1976, “Development of Design Charts for Bolts Preload Up to the Plastic Range,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., pp. 849–851. [CrossRef]
Englund, R. B., and Johnson, D. H., 1997, “Finite Element Analysis of Threaded Connections Compared to Experimental and Theoretical Research,” J. Eng. Technol., 14(2), pp. 42–47.
Englund, R. B., Johnson, D. H., and Sweeney, S., 1999, “A Finite Element Analysis Study of Non-Linear Behavior in a Bolted Connection,” ASME Mech. Eng. Des. Educ., 102, pp. 73–79.
Vekatesan, S., and Kinzel, G., 2006, “Reduction of Stress Concentration in Bolt-Nut Connectors,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 128, pp. 1337–1342. [CrossRef]
Hobbs, J. W., Burguete, R. L., and Patterson, E. A., 2003, “Investigation Into the Effect of the Nut Thread Run-Out on the Stress Distribution in a Bolt Using the Finite Element Method,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(3), pp. 527–532. [CrossRef]
Chen, J., and Shih, Y., 1999, “A Study of the Helical Effect on the Thread Connection by Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” Nucl. Eng. Des., 191, pp. 109–116. [CrossRef]
Sun, Y., and Liao, R., 2011, “The Effect of Helix on the Nonlinear Analysis of Threaded Connection,” Adv. Mater. Res., 148-149, pp. 1741–1744. [CrossRef]
Zadoks, R. I., and Kokatam, D., 2001, “Investigation of the Axial Stiffness of a Bolt Using a Three Dimensional Finite Element Model,” J. Sound Vib., 246(2), pp. 349–373. [CrossRef]
Zhang, M., Jiang, Y., and Lee, C., 2007, “Finite Element Modeling of Self-Loosening of Bolted Joints,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 129(2), pp. 218–226. [CrossRef]
Huang, J., and Guo, L., 2011, “The Research on the Torque-Tension Relationship for Bolted Joints,” Key Eng. Mater., 486, pp. 242–245. [CrossRef]
Fuokuoka, T., and Nomura, M., 2008, “Proposition of Helical Thread Modeling With Accurate Geometry and Finite Element Analysis,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Piping Technol., 130, p. 011204. [CrossRef]
Fuokuoka, T., Nomura, M., Takeda, Y., and Mori, U., 2011, “Analysis of the Tightening Process and the Cyclic Stress Amplitude of Studs and Tap Bolts,” ASME Proceedings of Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Paper No. PVP2011-57118.
Nassar, S. A., and Zuo, Y. P., 2005, “Effect of Non-Parallel Underhead Contact of a Tightened Fastener on Clamp Load and Optically Measured Deformation Field,” ASME Proceedings of Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Paper No. PVP2011-71525, pp. 157–167.
Altair Hyperworks 10.0, Altair Engineering, Inc., Michigan, www.altair.com
abaqus Documentation, “ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual,” Version 6.10. www.simulia.com

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the finite element model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Method to develop a finite element mesh of the mating threads

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Torque versus tension for torque-only process control method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of torque–tension curves for parallel contact to 1 deg wedge angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Comparison of von Mises stress plot at end of tightening process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Contact pressure under the bolt head developed during the tightening process for 1 deg wedge angle (scale set to 100 MPa for all plots)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of torque–tension curves for parallel contact to 2 deg, 3 deg, and 4 deg wedge angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

von Mises stress plot at end of tightening process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contact pressure under the bolt head developed during the tightening process for 4 deg wedge angle (scale set to 100 MPa for all plots)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Torque–tension curves illustrating effect of friction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Torque–tension curves illustrating effect of friction with 1 deg underhead wedge angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Torque–tension curves illustrating effect of friction between bolt hole and bolt shank with 4 deg underhead wedge angle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Effect of bolt hole clearance on torque–tension relationship (1 deg wedge angle)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Effect of hole clearance on torque–tension relationship (parallel to nonparallel contact under the bolt head)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Torque-angle-tension signature from torque-only process control method (target tightening torque = 125 Nm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Torque-angle curves from torque-turn process control method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Torque-angle curves with revised torque-angle process control method

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In