Research Papers

Finite Element Modeling of Cutting Force and Chip Formation During Thermally Assisted Machining of Ti6Al4V Alloy

[+] Author and Article Information
Yao Xi

e-mail: y.xi@uq.edu.au

Michael Bermingham

e-mail: m.bermingham@uq.edu.au

Gui Wang

e-mail: gui.wang@uq.edu.au

Matthew Dargusch

e-mail: m.dargusch@uq.edu.au

Centre for Advanced Materials
Processing and Manufacture,
School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering,
The University of Queensland, St. Lucia,
Queensland 4072, Australia;
Defence Materials Technology Centre,
Hawthorn VIC3122, Australia

Manuscript received April 21, 2013; final manuscript received October 9, 2013; published online November 18, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Yung Shin.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(6), 061014 (Nov 18, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-13-1176; doi: 10.1115/1.4025740 History: Received April 21, 2013; Revised October 09, 2013

The improvement in machinability during thermally assisted turning of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy has been investigated using finite element modeling. A 2D thermally assisted turning model was developed and validated by comparing the simulation results with experimental results. The effect of workpiece temperature on the cutting force and chip formation process was examined. The predicted cutting forces and chip morphologies from the simulation strongly correlated with the experimental results. It was observed from the simulation that the chip forms after the coalescence of two deformed regions in the shear band and that the cyclic cutting forces are strongly related to this chip formation process.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Three layers of the workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Original cutting force data predicted by the 2D turning model for different workpiece preheating temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cutting force data comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Shear stress and cutting force

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Shear stress in front of the cutting tool in the unit of Pa

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison between simulated chip formation and experimental chip. The contour shown in the simulation results is the equivalent plastic strain.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Chip measurement data comparison

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

History of chip formation: (a) equivalent plastic strain distribution at 7.0 × 10−6 s of cut, (b) temperature distribution at 7.0 × 10−6 s of cut, (c) equivalent plastic strain distribution at 9.7 × 10−6 s of cut, (d) equivalent plastic strain distribution at 1.0 × 10−6 s of cut. Cutting trial 1 simulation.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

The evolution of multiple shear bands on chips, the contour is the distribution of equivalent plastic strain. States (a)–(f) correspond to the cutting forces (a)–(f) in Fig. 11.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Detailed cyclic cutting forces, cutting forces (a)–(f) correspond to the states (a)–(f) in Fig. 10




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In