Research Papers

Standalone Throughput Analysis on the Wave Propagation of Disturbances in Production Sub-Systems

[+] Author and Article Information
Yang Li

e-mail: Yang.li.3@stonybrook.edu

Qing Chang

e-mail: qing.chang@stonybrook.edu

Michael P. Brundage

e-mail: Michael.Brundage@stonybrook.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
State University of New York at Stony Brook,
Stony Brook, NY 11794-2300

Guoxian Xiao

Manufacturing Systems Research Lab, General Motors Research and Development Center,
30500 Mound Road, Warren, MI 48090
e-mail: guoxian.xiao@gm.com

Stephan Biller

GE Global Research Center,
1 Research Circle, Niskayuna, NY 12309
e-mail: biller@ge.com

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received April 19, 2012; final manuscript received May 14, 2013; published online September 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Steven J. Skerlos.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(5), 051001 (Sep 11, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-12-1117; doi: 10.1115/1.4024815 History: Received April 19, 2012; Revised May 14, 2013

Standalone throughput (SAT) of a single station is one of the most widely used performance indexes in industry due to its clear definition, ease of evaluation and the ability to provide a guidance for continuous improvement in production systems. A complex multistage manufacturing system is typically segmented into several subsystems for efficient local management. It is important to evaluate performance of each subsystem to improve overall system productivity. However, the definition of standalone throughput of a production subsystem is not as clear as for a single station in current literatures or in practice, not to say an effective evaluation method. This paper deals with the standalone throughput of a serial production line segment. The definition and implication of standalone throughput of a line segment is discussed. A data driven method is developed based on online production data and is proved analytically under a practical assumption. In addition, the method is verified through simulation case studies to be an accurate and fast estimation of the standalone throughput of a production line segment.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hopp, W. J., and Simon, J. T., 1993, “Estimating Throughput in an Unbalanced Assembly-Like Flow System,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 31(4), pp. 4851–4868. [CrossRef]
Wallac, H., and Mark, S., 2000, Factory Physics, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York.
Koenigsberg, E., 1959, “Production Line and Internal Storage–A Review,” Manage. Sci., 5(4), pp. 410–433. [CrossRef]
Buxey, G. M., Slack, N. D., and Wild, R., 1973, “Production Flow Line Systems Design—A Review,” AIIE Trans., 5(1), pp. 37–48. [CrossRef]
Blumenfeld, D. E., and Li, J. S., 2005, “An Analytical Formula for Throughput of A Production Line With Identical Stations and Random Failures,” Math. Probl. Eng., 2005(3), pp. 293–308. [CrossRef]
Buzacott, J. A., and Hanifin, L. E., 1978, “Models of Automatic Transfer Lines With Inventory Banks: A Review and Comparison,” AIIE Trans., 10(2), pp. 197–207. [CrossRef]
Govil, M. C., and Fu, M. C., 1996, “Queueing Theory in Manufacturing: A Survey,” J. Manuf. Syst., 18(3), pp. 214–240. [CrossRef]
Alden, J. M., Burns, L. D., Costy, T., Hutton, R. D., Jackson, C. A., Kim, D. S., Kohls, K. A., Owen, J. H., Turnquist, M. A., and Vander Veen, D. J., 2006, “General Motors Increases Its Production Throughput,” Interfaces, 36(1), pp. 6–25. [CrossRef]
Tjahjono, B., and Fernandez, R., 2008, “Practical Approach to Experimentation in a Simulation Study,” Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1981–1988.
Schruben, L., 2000, “Mathematical Programming Models of Discrete Event System Dynamics,” Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Vol. 1, pp. 381–385.
Koturiak, J., and Gregor, M., 1999, “Simulation in Production System Life Cycle,” Comput Ind., 38(2), pp. 159–172. [CrossRef]
Fowler, J. W., and Rose, O., 2004, “Grand Challenges in Modeling and Simulation of Complex Manufacturing Systems,” Simulation, 80(9), pp. 469–476. [CrossRef]
Franz, L. S., 1989, “Data Driven Modeling: An Application in Scheduling,” Decision Sci., 20(2), pp. 359–377. [CrossRef]
Slotwinski, J. A., and Tilove, R. B., 2006, “Smart Assembly: Industry Needs and Technical Challenges,” Proceeding PerMIS'07 Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, pp. 257–262.
Heilala, J., Helaakoski, H., and Peltomaa, I., 2008, “Smart Assembly-Data and Model Driven,” Int. Fed. Inf. Process., 260(2008), pp. 371–381. [CrossRef]
Lee, S., Cho, H., and Jung, M., 2000, “A Conceptual Framework for the Generation of Simulation Models From Process Plans and Resource Configuration,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 38(4), pp. 811–828. [CrossRef]
Das, S. R., 2000, “Adaptive Protocols for Parallel Discrete Event Simulation,” J. Oper. Res. Soc., 51(4), pp. 385–394.
Fujimoto, R. M., 2000, Parallel and Distributed Simulation Systems, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
Li, J., Blumenfeld, D. E., Huang, N., and Alden, J. M., 2009, “Throughput Analysis of Production Systems: Recent Advances and Future Topics,” Int. J. Prod. Res., 47, pp. 3823–3851. [CrossRef]
Choong, Y. F., and Gershwin, S. B., 1987, “A Decomposition Method for the Approximate Evaluation of Capacitated Transfer Lines With Unreliable Machines and Random Processing Times,” IIE Trans., 19, pp. 150–159. [CrossRef]
Gershwin, S. B., 1987, “An Efficient Decomposition Method for the Approximate Evaluation of Tandem Queues With Finite Storage Space and Blocking,” Oper. Res., 35, pp. 291–305. [CrossRef]
Gershwin, S. B., 1987, “Representation and Analysis of Transfer Lines With Machines That Have Different Processing Rates,” Ann. Oper. Res., 9, pp. 511–530. [CrossRef]
Jacobs, D. A., and Meerkov, S. M., 1995, “A System-Theoretic Property of Serial Production Lines: Improvability,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., 26, pp. 95–137. [CrossRef]
Jacobs, D. A., and Meerkov, S. M., 1995, “Mathematical Theory of Improvability for Production Systems,” Math. Probl. Eng., 1, pp. 95–137. [CrossRef]
Jacobs, D. A., and Meerkov, S. M., 1995, “System-Theoretic Analysis of Due-Time Performance in Production Systems,” Math. Probl. Eng., 1, pp. 225–243. [CrossRef]
Buzacott, J. A., and Shantikumar, J. G., 1993, Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Altiok, T., 1997, Performance Analysis of Manufacturing Systems, Springer, Berlin.
Sevast'yanov, B. A., 1962, “Influence of Storage Bin Capacity on the Average Standstill Time of a Production Line,” Theory Probab. Math. Stat., 7(4), pp. 429–438.
Wijingaard, J., 1979, “The Effect of Inter Stage Buffer Storage on Output of Two Unreliable Production Units in Series With Different Rates,” AIIE Trans., 11(1), pp. 42–47. [CrossRef]
Gershwin, S. B., and Schick, I. C., 1980, “Continuous Model of an Unreliable Two-Stage Material Flow System With a Finite Inter-Stage Buffer,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technique Report No. 1039.
Chang, Q., Ni, J., Bandyopadhyay, P., Biller, S., and Xiao, G., 2007, “Maintenance Opportunity Planning System,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 129, pp. 661–668. [CrossRef]
Chang, Q., Liu, J., Biller, S., and Xiao, G., 2010, “Transient Analysis of Downtime Event in Manufacturing Systems,” Proceedings of the 2010 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 501–511.
Chang, Q., Biller, S., and Xiao, G., 2010, “Transient Analysis of Downtimes and Bottleneck Dynamics in Serial Manufacturing Systems,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132(5), pp. 132–141. [CrossRef]
Chang, Q., Xiao, G., Li, L., and Biller, S., 2011, “Energy Management in Manufacturing System,” Proceedings of the 2011 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Vol. 2, pp. 119–125.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A serial production line with M stations and M − 1 buffers, with a line segment l from Sl1 to Slm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The production system with a serial production line segment l

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 6

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 7

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Estimation using Eq. (11) versus Definition 1 in case 9




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In