Research Papers

Characterization of Fluid Film Produced by an Atomization-Based Cutting Fluid Spray System During Machining

[+] Author and Article Information
Alexander C. Hoyne

e-mail: ahoyne2@gmail.com

Chandra Nath

Post Doctorate Research Associate
e-mail: nathc2@asme.org

Shiv G. Kapoor

e-mail: sgkapoor@illinois.edu
Department of Mechanical
Science and Engineering,
University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign,
1206 W. Green St.,
Urbana, IL 61801
e-mail: sgkapoor@illinois.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received January 17, 2013; final manuscript received June 26, 2013; published online September 11, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Burak Ozdoganlar.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(5), 051006 (Sep 11, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: MANU-13-1021; doi: 10.1115/1.4025012 History: Received January 17, 2013; Revised June 26, 2013

The atomization-based cutting fluid (ACF) spray system has recently been proposed as a cooling and lubrication solution for machining hard to machine materials (e.g., titanium alloys). On the tool rake face, the ACF spray system forms a thin film from cutting fluid that penetrates into the tool–chip interface to improve tool life. The objective of this work is to characterize this thin fluid film in terms of thickness and velocity for a set of ACF spray parameters. ACF spray experiments are performed by varying impingement angle to observe the nature of the spreading film and to determine the film thickness at different locations after impingement of the droplets. It is observed that the film spreads radially outward producing three fluid film development zones (i.e., impingement, steady, and unsteady). The steady zone is found to be between 3 and 7 mm from the focus (impingement point) of the ACF spray for the set of parameters investigated. An analytical 3D thin fluid film model for the ACF spray system has also been developed based on the Navier–Stokes equations for mass and momentum. The model requires a unique treatment of the cross-film velocity profile, droplet impingement, and pressure distributions, as well as a strong gas–liquid shear interaction. The thickness profiles predicted by the analytical film model have been validated. Moreover, the model predictions of film velocity and chip flow characteristics during a titanium turning experiment reveal that the fluid film can easily penetrate into the entire tool–chip interface with the use of the ACF spray system.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nath, C., Kapoor, S. G., DeVor, R., Srivastava, A., and Iverson, J., 2012, “Design and Evaluation of an Atomization-Based Cutting Fluid Spray System in Turning of Titanium Alloy,” J. Manuf. Process., 14(4), pp. 452–459. [CrossRef]
Jun, M., Suhas, S., DeVor, R., and Kapoor, S. G., 2008, “An Experimental Evaluation of an Atomization Based Cutting Fluid Application System for Micromachining,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 130(3), p. 031118. [CrossRef]
Rukosuyev, M., Goo, C. S., and Jun, M. B. G., 2010, “Understanding the Effects of the System Parameters of an Ultrasonic Cutting Fluid Application System for Micro-machining,” J. Manuf. Process., 12, pp. 92–98. [CrossRef]
Mundo, C., Sommerfield, M., and Tropea, C., 1994, “Droplet-Wall Collisions: Experimental Studies of the Deformation and Breakup Process,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 21(2), pp. 151–173. [CrossRef]
Yarin, A. L., and Weiss, D. A., 1995, “Impact of Drops on Solid Surfaces: Self-Similar Capillary Waves, and Splashing as a New Type of Kinematic Discontinuity,” J. Fluid Mech., 283, pp. 141–173. [CrossRef]
Cossali, G. E., Coghe, A., and Marengo, M., 1997, “The Impact of a Single Drop on a Wetted Solid Surface,” Exp. Fluids, 22, pp. 463–472. [CrossRef]
Ghai, I., Wentz, J., DeVor, R. E., Kapoor, S. G., and Samuel, J., 2010, “Droplet Behavior on a Rotating Surface for Atomization-Based Cutting Fluid Application in Micromachining,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 132(1), p. 011017. [CrossRef]
Pan, K., and Hung, C., 2010, “Droplet Impact Upon a Wet Surface With Varied Fluid Surface Properties,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 352, pp. 186–193. [CrossRef]
Kalantari, D., and Tropea, C., 2007, “Spray Impact Onto Flat Rigid Walls: Emperical Characterization and Modeling,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 33, pp. 525–544. [CrossRef]
Arcoumanis, C., Whitelaw, D. S., and Whitelaw, J. H., 1997, “Gasoline Injection Against Surfaces and Films,” Atomization Sprays, 7, pp. 437–456.
Kim, W., Kang, S., and Rho, B., 2000, “Gasoline Spray Characteristics Impinging onto the Wall Surface in Suction Air Flow,” KSME Int. J., 14(12), pp. 1376–1385. [CrossRef]
Tropea, C., and Roisman, I., 2000, “Modeling of Spray Impact on Solid Surfaces,” Atomization Sprays, 10, pp. 387–408.
Stanton, D., and Rutland, C., 1998, “Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Thin Liquid Films and Spray-Wall Interactions Resulting From Impinging Sprays,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 41, pp. 3037–3054. [CrossRef]
Lee, S., Ko, G., Ryou, H., and Hong, K., 2001, “Development and Application of a New Spray Impingement Model Considering Film Formation in a Diesel Engine,” KSME Int. J., 14(7), pp. 951–961. [CrossRef]
Trujilo, M., and Lee, C. F., 2003, “Modeling Film Dynamics in Spray Impingement,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 125, pp. 104–112. [CrossRef]
Spathopoulou, M., Gavaises, M., Theodorakakos, A., and Yanagihara, H., 2009, “Formation and Development of Wall Liquid Films During Impaction of Gasoline Fuel Sprays,” Atomization Sprays, 19, pp. 701–726. [CrossRef]
Yarin, A. L., 2006, “Drop Impact Dynamics: Splashing, Spreading, Receding, Bouncing…,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 38, pp. 159–192. [CrossRef]
Hurlburt, E., and Newell, T., 1995, “Optical Measurement of Liquid Film Thickness and Wave Velocity in Liquid Film Flows,” Exp. Fluids, 21(5), pp. 357–362.
Moreira, A., Moita, A., and Panao, M. R., 2010, “Advances and Challenges in Explaining Fuel Spray Impingement: How Much of Single Droplet Research is Useful?,” Prog Energy Combust. Sci., 36, pp. 554–558. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimental setup for fluid film measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

ACF spray and DIP/POD dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the ACF spray system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Side view of spreading film (φ = 35 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Top view of spreading film (φ = 35 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Fluid film described with mesh and coordinates and (b) an arbitrary fluid cell

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Droplet distribution due to ACF spray

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Illustration of film velocity profile

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Experimental and predicted film thickness values over POD and DIP for: (a) φ = 20 deg, and (b) φ = 35 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Chip lifting-falling cycle during titanium machining: (a) chip lifting allows thin film to penetrate, (b) chip falling causes fluid excretion from the interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Fluid film velocity at 9.6 ms for φ = 35 deg




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In