0
Research Papers

Detailed Study of Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in the Abrasive Grinding Contact Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Methods

[+] Author and Article Information
Stefan D. Mihić

e-mail: smihiae@rockets.utoledo.edu

Sorin Cioc

e-mail: Sorin.Cioc@eng.utoledo.edu

Ioan D. Marinescu

e-mail: ioan.marinescu@utoledo.edu
The University of Toledo,
2801 W. Bancroft,
Toledo, OH 43606

Michael C. Weismiller

Master Chemical Corporation,
501 West Boundary Street,
Perrysburg, OH 43551
e-mail: mcweismiller@masterchemical.com

Reference cited in Table 2 are [18].

References cited in the Table 3 are [19-23].

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Manuscript received December 3, 2010; final manuscript received July 23, 2012; published online July 17, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Allen Y. Yi.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(4), 041002 (Jul 17, 2013) (13 pages) Paper No: MANU-10-1357; doi: 10.1115/1.4023719 History: Received December 03, 2010; Revised July 23, 2012

This paper introduces a set of research oriented computational fluid dynamics (CFD) 3D models used to simulate the fluid flow and heat transfer in a grinding process. The most important features of these models are described and some representative simulation results are presented, along with comparisons to published experimental data. Distributions of temperatures, pressures, velocities, and liquid volume fractions in and around the grinding region are obtained in great detail. Such results are essential in studying the influence of the fluid on the grinding process, as well as in determining the best fluid composition and supply parameters for a given application. The simulation results agree well with experimental global flow rates, temperature, and pressure values, showing the feasibility of CFD simulations in grinding applications.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rowe, W. B., 2009, Principles of Modern Grinding Technology, William Andrew, Norwich, NY.
Brinksmeier, E., Heinzel, C., Wittmann, M., 1999, “Friction, Cooling and Lubrication in Grinding,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Tech., 48(2), pp. 581–598. [CrossRef]
Ebbrell, S., Wooley, N. A., Tridimas, Y. D., Allanson, D. R., and Rowe, W. B., 2000, “The Effects of Cutting Fluid Application Methods on the Grinding Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 40, pp. 209–223. [CrossRef]
Kaliszer, H., and Trmal, G., 1975, “Mechanics of Grinding Fluid Delivery,” SME Tech Paper No. MR75-614.
Engineer, F., Guo, C., and Malkin, S., 1992, “Experimental Measurement of Fluid Flow Through the Grinding Zone,” ASME J. Eng. Industry, 114(1), pp. 61–66. [CrossRef]
Gviniashvili, V. K., Woolley, N. H., and Rowe, W. B., 2004, “Useful Coolant Flow Rate in Grinding,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 44, pp. 629–636. [CrossRef]
Morgan, M. N., Jackson, A. R., Wua, H., Baines-Jones, V., Batako, A., and Rowe, W. B., 2008, “Optimisation of Fluid application in Grinding,” CIRP Ann. Manuf. Tech., 57, pp. 363–366. [CrossRef]
Chang, C. C., 1997, “An Application of Lubrication Theory to Predict Useful Flow-Rate of Coolants on Grinding Porous Media,” Tribol. Int., 30(8), pp. 575–581. [CrossRef]
Liao, Y. S., Luo, S. Y., and Yang, T. H., 2000, “A Thermal Model of the Wet Grinding Process,” J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 101, pp. 137–145. [CrossRef]
Ansys, Inc., 2006, FLUENT 6.3 User's Guide, September 2006, Canonsburg, PA.
Sarkar, S., and Balakrishnan, L., 1990, “Application of a Reynolds-Stress Turbulence Model to the Compressible Shear Layer,” ICASE Report 90-18, NASA CR 182002.
Gibson, M. M., and Launder, B. E., 1978, “Ground Effects on Pressure Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer,” J. Fluid Mech., 86, pp. 491–511. [CrossRef]
Fu, S., Launder, B. E., and Leschziner, M. A., 1987, “Modeling Strongly Swirling Recirculating Jet Flow With Reynolds-Stress Transport Closures,” 6th Symposium on Turbulent Shear Flows, Toulouse, France.
Launder, B. E., 1989, “Second-Moment Closure and Its Use in Modeling Turbulent Industrial Flows,” Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluid., 9, pp. 963–985. [CrossRef]
Hahn, R. S., 1962, “On the Nature of the Grinding Process,” 3rd MATADOR Conf., pp. 129–155.
Malkin, S., and Guo, C., 1989, Grinding Technology: Theory and Applications of Machining With Abrasives, Industrial Press, Inc., New York.
Milikić, D., 1989, “Temperaturen bei Schleifen—Entwicklung, Messung, und Einfluss auf Schleifergebnisse,” 3. Schleiftechnische Fachtagung, Magdeburg, Dec. 14–15.
Kienzle, O., 1951, “Die bestimmung von kräften und Leistungen an Spanenden Werkzeugen und Werzeugmaschinen,” Gekürzte Wiedergabe eines Vortrages in der Fachsitzung “Betriebstechnik” der 81. VDI—Hauptversammlung, Hannover.
Blazek, J., 2001, “Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications,” Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
Choi, S. U., and Kang, H., 2009, Reynolds Stress Modeling of Turbulent Open-Channel Flows, Nova Publishing, Hauppauge, New York.
Wesseling, P., 2001, Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Wacławczyk, T., and Koronowicz, T., 2008, “Comparison of CICSAM and HRIC High-Resolution Schemes for Interface Capturing,” J. Theoret. Appl Mech., 46(2), pp. 325–345. Available at http://www.ptmts.org.pl/article.xsl?vol=46&no=2&page=325
Patankar, S. V., 1980, Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, DC.
Hryniewicz, P., Szeri, A. Z., and Jahanmir, S., 2001, “Application of Lubrication Theory to Fluid Flow in Grinding: Part I—Flow Between Smooth Surfaces,” ASME J. Tribol., 123(1), pp. 94–100. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematics of the grinding process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Representative geometry for model 1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Representative geometry for model 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Pathlines of liquid droplets colored by the fluid particle number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Velocity vectors of liquid colored by velocity magnitude (m/s). Range of velocity vectors shown: 8 m/s to 53.6 m/s. Wheel and nozzle fluid velocity were both 50 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Velocity contours of air (m/s), range of velocities: 0 m/s to 64.9 m/s; (b) velocity vectors of air (m/s), range of velocities: 0 m/s to 53.6 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of numerical and experimental results for useful flow rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Maximum temperature change of the grinding fluid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Static pressures on the ground part

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

View of fluid velocity vector field colored by grinding fluid volume fraction. Wheel velocity was 60 m/s, nozzle fluid velocity was 50 m/s. Volume fraction varies between 0 (air) and 1 (liquid).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Velocity vectors of grinding fluid colored by the velocity magnitude (m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Velocity vectors of grinding fluid for inlet flow rate of 3 kg/s/m (m/s). Wheel velocity was 60 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Velocity vectors of grinding fluid for inlet flow rate of 22 kg/s/m (m/s). Wheel velocity was 60 m/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Velocity vectors of the grinding fluid colored by the temperature (K), range of temperatures: 299 K to787 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Maximum temperature on the ground work piece versus nozzle flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Static pressure on the ground part and grinding wheel (Pa)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In