0
Research Papers

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Cutting Process With Thin Shear Plane Model

[+] Author and Article Information
Eiji Shamoto

e-mail: shamoto@mech.nagoya-u.ac.jp

Rei Hino

Department of Mechanical
Science and Engineering,
Nagoya University,
Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku,
Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Manuscript received July 5, 2010; final manuscript received March 4, 2013; published online July 17, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Burak Ozdoganlar.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(4), 041001 (Jul 17, 2013) (12 pages) Paper No: MANU-10-1191; doi: 10.1115/1.4024531 History: Received July 05, 2010; Revised March 04, 2013; Accepted March 08, 2013

A new and basic analytical model of three-dimensional cutting is proposed by assuming multiple thin shear planes with either the maximum shear stress or minimum energy principle. The three-dimensional cutting process with an arbitrarily shaped cutting edge in a flat rake face is formulated with simple vector equations in order to understand and quickly simulate the process. The cutting edge and workpiece profile are discretized and expressed by their position vectors. Two equations among three unknown vectors, which show the directions of shear, chip flow, and resultant cutting force, are derived from the geometric relations of velocities and forces. The last vector equation required to solve the three unknown vectors is obtained by applying either the maximum shear stress or minimum energy principle. It is confirmed that the directions and the cutting forces simulated by solving the proposed vector equations agree with experimentally measured data. Furthermore, the developed model is applied to consider the three-dimensional cutting mechanics, i.e., how the chip is formed in the three-dimensional cutting with compressive stress acting between the discrete chips, as an example.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Krystof, J., 1939, “Technologische Mechanik der Zerspanung,” Berichte uber Betriebswissenschaftliche Arbeiten, VDI, 12, pp. 1–19.
Lee, E. H., and Shaffer, B. W., 1951, “The Theory of Plasticity Applied to a Problem of Machining,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 18, pp. 405–413.
Merchant, M. E., 1945, “Mechanics of the Metal Cutting Process. II. Plasticity Conditions in Orthogonal Cutting,” J. Appl. Phys., 16, pp. 318–324. [CrossRef]
Merchant, M. E., 1944, “Basic Mechanics of the Metal-Cutting Process,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 11, pp. A168–A175.
Stabler, G. V., 1951, “The Fundamental Geometry of Cutting Tools,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 165, pp. 14–21. [CrossRef]
Armarego, E. J. A., and Brown, R. H., 1969, “The Machining of Metals,” Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Usui, E., Hirota, A., and Masuko, M., 1978, “Analytical Prediction of Three-Dimensional Cutting Process. Part 1 Basic Cutting Model and Energy Approach,” Trans. ASME, 100, pp. 222–228. [CrossRef]
Shamoto, E., 2002, “Study on Three Dimensional Cutting Mechanics (1st Report)—Comprehension and Vector Formulation of Oblique Cutting Process,” J. JSPE, 68(3), pp. 408–414. [CrossRef]
Shamoto, E., and Altintas, Y., 1999, “Prediction of Shear Angle in Oblique Cutting With Maximum Shear Stress and Minimum Energy Principles,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 121, pp. 399–407. [CrossRef]
Strenkowski, J. S., and Carroll, J. T., III, 1985, “A Finite Element Model of Orthogonal Metal Cutting,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 107, pp. 349–354. [CrossRef]
Ueda, K., and Manabe, K., 1993, “Rigid-Plastic FEM Analysis of Three-Dimensional Deformation Field in Chip Formation Process,” Ann. CIRP, 42(1), pp. 35–38. [CrossRef]
Altintas, Y., 2000, “Manufacturing Automation-Metal Cutting Mechanics Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design,” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Connolly, R., and Rubenstein, C., 1968, “The Mechanics of Continuous Chip Formation in Orthogonal Cutting,” Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res., 8, pp. 159–187. [CrossRef]
VenuvinodP. K., and JinW. L., 1996, “Three-Dimensional Cutting Force Analysis Based on the Lower Boundary of the Shear zone—Part 1: Single Edge Oblique Cutting”, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 36(3), pp. 307–323. [CrossRef]
Colwell, L. V., 1954, “Predicting the Angle of Chip Flow for Single-Point Cutting Tools,” Trans. ASME, 76, pp. 199–204.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Three-dimensional cutting process with discretized cutting edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Discretized workpiece profile and cutting edge

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Parameters in three-dimensional cutting process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Areas sheared by discrete cutting edges

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Direction of resultant cutting force to generate each shear plane in maximum shear stress principle: (a) 1st shear plane and (b) kth shear plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relation among vector equations and parameters to represent three-dimensional cutting process: (a) maximum shear stress model and (b) minimum energy model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Setup for planing experiments with ultraprecision machine tool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Setup for turning experiments with conventional lathe

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Analytical and experimental results of ultraprecision planing with V-shaped diamond tool. Experimental and simulation conditions: workpiece material was brass, depth of cut d = 20 μm, feed rate f = 8–40 μm, cutting speed Vw = 3 m/min, dry cutting, V-shaped single crystal diamond tool, ψt = 90 deg, γ = 15 deg (see Appendix B), αf = 5 deg, αt = 0 deg, identified material properties τ = 500 MPa, β = 5.5–9.0 deg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Analytical and experimental results of turning with sintered carbide tool with nose radius. Experimental and simulation conditions: workpiece material was tough-pitch copper, combination of depth of cut and feed rate (d, f) = (475, 250), (344, 310), (226, 410), (173, 500), and (145, 590) μm, cutting speed Vw = 85 m/min, mineral oil was supplied as cutting fluid, sintered carbide tool with mirror-finished rake face, Rt = 0.2 mm, ψt = 80 deg, γ = 5 deg, αf = 0 deg, αt = 0 deg, identified material properties τ = 500 MPa, β = 28.4 deg (averaged).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Three-dimensional cutting processes simulated by applying developed thin shear plane model and either minimum energy or maximum shear stress principle and comparisons of chip sections between simulations and experiments. The other experimental and simulation conditions are same as shown in Fig. 12. (a) Depth of cut d = 475 μm, feed rate f = 250 μm, minimum energy principle. (b) Depth of cut d = 145 μm, feed rate f = 590 μm, maximum shear stress principle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Three-dimensional cutting process predicted by maximum shear stress model. Simulation conditions are same as Fig. 13(b). Viewing directions are aligned with shear direction in left illustration and perpendicular to parallel plane in right illustration, respectively.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Oblique cutting process and parameters predicted by maximum shear stress model at condition of inclination angle = 30 deg, normal rake angle = 10 deg, and friction angle β = 30 deg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Discrete points on cutting edge and workpiece profile in turning process. (a) At small feed rate and small depth of cut and (b) at large feed rate and large depth of cut.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In