Research Papers

Joint Production and Preventive Maintenance Strategy for Manufacturing Systems With Stochastic Demand

[+] Author and Article Information
Xiaoning Jin

e-mail: xnjin@umich.edu

Jun Ni

e-mail: junni@umich.edu
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Manuscript received October 15, 2012; final manuscript received February 23, 2013; published online May 24, 2013. Editor: Y. Lawrence Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(3), 031016 (May 24, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: MANU-12-1306; doi: 10.1115/1.4024042 History: Received October 15, 2012; Revised February 23, 2013

This paper seeks to make joint decisions on preventive maintenance level and production quantity for manufacturing systems subject to stochastic demand in a finite-horizon. Standard models for scheduling preventive maintenance typically ignore the throughput target variation due to demand uncertainty and specify instead a constant demand rate. We show that maintenance decisions should be integrated with production decisions to accommodate the demand uncertainty. To achieve this objective, preventive maintenance (PM) flexibility is introduced as the opportunity to select and implement maintenance tasks at different levels, which can be viewed as real options to the manufacturer. PM levels can be defined according to the degree to which the machine condition is stored by maintenance. A preventive maintenance can be a minimal, imperfect, or perfect one. By leveraging PM flexibility, this paper proposes a model to determine optimal production quantity and PM level for a single-product manufacturing system with a finite planning horizon. A real option analysis (ROA) is developed to quantify the benefits and costs of PM flexibility. We derive optimal joint decisions for maintenance and production that maximize the overall expected profit of the system. We compare the proposed PM-flexible model with the conventional PM-fixed model in a case study. The results demonstrate the condition that the PM-flexible model outperforms the PM-fixed model in terms of option value (expected operating profits). We also show how the growth in demand volatility affects the optimal decisions and overall profitability. These results have important implications for making maintenance and production decisions, especially in industries that feature high demand volatility.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Ben-Daya, M., 1999, “Integrated Production Maintenance and Quality Model for Imperfect Processes,” IIE Trans., 31, pp. 491–501. [CrossRef]
Ni, J., Jin, X., and Koren, Y., 2012, “Decision Support Systems for Effective Maintenance Operations,” CIRP Ann. Manf. Tech., 61(1), pp. 411–414. [CrossRef]
Xia, T., Xi, L., Zhou, X., and Lee, J., 2012, “Dynamic Maintenance Decision-Making for Series-Parallel Manufacturing System Based on MAM-MTW Methodology,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 221(1), pp. 231–240. [CrossRef]
Srinivasan, M. M., and Lee, H. S., 1996, “Production/Inventory System With Preventive Maintenance,” IIE Trans., 28, pp. 879–890.
Iravani, S. M. R., and Duenyas, I., 2002, “Integrated Maintenance and Production Control of a Deteriorating Production System,” IIE Trans., 34(5), pp. 423–435. [CrossRef]
Yao, X., Xie, X., Fu, M., and Marcus, S. I., 2005, “Optimal Joint Preventive Maintenance and Production Policies,” Naval Res. Logist., 52, pp. 668–681. [CrossRef]
Jin, X., Li, L., and Ni, J., 2009, “Option Model for Joint Production and Preventive Maintenance System,” Int. J. Prod, Eco., 119(2), pp. 347–353. [CrossRef]
Gerwin, D., 1993, “Manufacturing Flexibility: A Strategic Perspective,” Manage. Sci., 39(4), pp. 395–410. [CrossRef]
da Silveira, G. J. C., 2006, “Effects of Simplicity and Discipline on Operational Flexibility: An Empirical Reexamination of the Rigid Flexibility Model,” J. Oper. Manage., 24(6), pp. 932–947. [CrossRef]
Sethi, A. K., and Sethi, S. P., 1990, “Flexibility in Manufacturing: A Survey,” Int. J. Flex. Man. Sys., 2, pp. 289–328. [CrossRef]
Hallgren, M., and Olhager, J., 2009, “Flexibility Configurations: Empirical Analysis of Volume and Product Mix Flexibility,” Omega, 37, pp. 746–756. [CrossRef]
Das, T. K., and Sarkar, S., 1999, “Optimal Preventive Maintenance in a Production Inventory System,” IIE Trans., 31(6), pp. 537–551. [CrossRef]
Song, D., 2009, “Production and Preventive Maintenance Control in a Stochastic Manufacturing System,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 119, pp. 101–111. [CrossRef]
Gerwin, D., 1987, “An Agenda for Research on the Flexibility of Manufacturing Processes,” Int. J. Oper. Prod. Man., 7(1), pp. 38–49. [CrossRef]
Olhager, J., 1993, “Manufacturing Flexibility and Profitability,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 30–31, pp. 67–78. [CrossRef]
Bollen, N. P., 1999, “Real Options and Product Life Cycles,” Manage. Sci., 45, pp. 670–684. [CrossRef]
Aghezzaf, E. H., Jamali, M. A., and Ait-Kadi, D., 2007, “An Integrated Production and Preventive Maintenance Planning Model,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 181, pp. 679–685. [CrossRef]
Rezg, N., Chelbi, A., and Xie, X., 2005, “Modeling and Optimizing a Joint Inventory Control and Preventive Maintenance Strategy for a Randomly Failing Production Unit: Analytical and Simulation Approaches,” Int. J. Comp. Integ. M., 18(2–3), pp. 225–235. [CrossRef]
Pham, H., and Wang, H., 1996, “Imperfect Maintenance,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., 94, pp. 425–438. [CrossRef]
Bengtsson, J., 2001, “Manufacturing Flexibility and Real Options: A Review,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 74, pp. 213–224. [CrossRef]
Trigeorgis, L., 1996, Real Options: Management Flexibility and Strategy in Resource Allocation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Pindyck, R., 1988, “Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm,” Am. Econ. Rev., 78, pp. 969–985. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1807160
Dixit, A. K., and Pindyck, R. S., 1994, Investment Under Uncertainty, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Cox, J., Ross, S., and Rubinstein, M., 1979, “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach,” J. Fin. Eco., 12, pp. 229–263. [CrossRef]
Smit, H. T., and Trigeorgis, L., 2006, “Strategic Planning: Valuing and Managing Portfolios of Real Options,” R&D Manage., 36(4), pp. 403–419. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Binomial lattice of discretized demand evolution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

An example of an integrated production and PM planning

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Possible demand values

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Effect of the possible demand value throughout the planning horizon: (a) the quantity to produce increases with the growth in demand; (b) the optimal operating profit increases with the growth in demand

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

(a) Option value with flexible PM strategy with demand volatility (b) zoomed-in results of option value

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of demand volatility on the predicted option value




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In