Research Papers

Quantifying the Visibility of Surface Distortions in Class “A” Automotive Exterior Body Panels

[+] Author and Article Information
K. D. Fernholz

Ford Motor Company,
MD 3182/RIC,
P.O. Box 2053,
Dearborn, MI 48121-2053
e-mail: Kedzie.fernholz@gmail.com

1Present address: GE Aviation Systems, 1 Neumann Way, M/D U5, Cincinnati, OH 45215.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received December 15, 2010; final manuscript received September 5, 2012; published online January 7, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Eric R. Marsh.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(1), 011001 (Jan 07, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: MANU-10-1381; doi: 10.1115/1.4007984 History: Received December 15, 2010; Revised September 05, 2012

Visible distortions in Class “A” automotive surfaces are unacceptable to vehicle customers and therefore are considered to be cosmetic defects. The automotive industry currently relies upon subjective assessment of the severity of these distortions to determine whether a component's surface appearance is acceptable. Given the inherent variability in subjective assessments, however, an objective measurement for assessing the severity of defects would be of great benefit to the industry. The issues that need to be addressed to objectively quantify the severity of one particular type of surface distortion are discussed and a methodology for quantifying the severity of that surface distortion in a way that correlates to human perception is proposed. Experimental and finite element model data supporting the proposed methodology is presented.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Illustration of global (a) versus local surface (b) deviations

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Profilometer scan of a paint can lid bonded to a piece of steel with single drop of adhesive

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Profilometer line scan through the drop of adhesive used to bond a paint can lid to a piece of steel

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Curvature map of a Class “A” surface prior to post processing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Photograph of the back side of a freestanding SMC outer panel with epoxy adhesive applied

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Curvature map of the Class “A” surface of the panel in Fig. 5 after filtering and masking

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Predicted displacement (altitude), slope, and curvature for an 2.5 mm thick SMC freestanding outer panel with an idealized 9 mm wide × 4.5 mm high epoxy adhesive bead

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Schematic of experimental assemblies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Filtered curvature maps of the twelve painted assemblies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Curvature maps of the twelve painted assemblies prior to masking and filtering

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Comparison of the curvature calculated from profilometer data to the ondulo curvature values after filtering in an SMC “lab-scale” assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of measured and predicted curvatures at a typical bond-line section for an SMC assembly




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In