Research Papers

Size Reduction of Cellulosic Biomass in Biofuel Manufacturing: Separating the Confounding Effects of Particle Size and Biomass Crystallinity

[+] Author and Article Information
Meng Zhang

e-mail: meng@ksu.edu

Xiaoxu Song

e-mail: xiaoxu@ksu.edu

Pengfei Zhang

e-mail: pengfei@ksu.edu

Z. J. Pei

e-mail: zpei@ksu.edu

T. W. Deines

e-mail: tdeines@ksu.edu
Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Systems Engineering,
Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS 66506

Donghai Wang

Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering,
Kansas State University,
Manhattan, KS 66506
e-mail: dwang@ksu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Manuscript received December 31, 2011; final manuscript received December 17, 2012; published online March 22, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Steven J. Skerlos.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 135(2), 021006 (Mar 22, 2013) (5 pages) Paper No: MANU-11-1418; doi: 10.1115/1.4023378 History: Received December 31, 2011; Revised December 17, 2012

Increasing demands and concerns for reliable supply of liquid transportation fuels make it important to find alternative sources to petroleum-based fuels. Cellulosic biofuels provide one such alternative in the short to medium term. Size reduction is the first step for converting biomass into biofuels. In the literature, there are inconsistent reports about the effects of particle size and biomass crystallinity on sugar yield (proportional to biofuel yield). An important reason for this inconsistence is that particle formation in current size reduction methods is not well controlled, causing the effects of these two variables confounded. One paper investigating the confounding effects of particle size and biomass crystallinity using a metal-cutting (milling) process was previously published in this journal. This paper presents a follow-up study. In this study, a lathe was used to produce poplar wood particles with the same crystallinity but different sizes, making it possible to study the effects of particle size on biofuel yield independently without being confounded by the effects of biomass crystallinity. Results showed that, for the three levels of particle size used in this study, sugar yield increased as particle size became smaller. This study also revealed future research opportunities to understand the effects of size reduction and biomass crystallinity in cellulosic biofuel manufacturing.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Energy Information Administration, 2010, “Annual Energy Review 2009,” Report No. DOE/EIA-0384(2009), http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/aer.pdf
Moriarty, P., and Honnery, D., 2008, “Low-Mobility: The Future of Transport,” Futures, 40, pp. 865–872. [CrossRef]
U.S. Department of Energy, 2009, “Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda,” http://genomicscience.energy.gov/biofuels/b2bworkshop.shtml
Perlack, R. D., and Stokes, B. J., 2011, “U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry,” Report No. ORNL/TM-2011/224, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, http://www1.eere.energy.gov/biomass/pdfs/billion_ton_update.pdf
Gray, K. A., Zhao, L., and Emptage, M., 2006, “Bioethanol,” Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 10, pp. 141–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Drapcho, C. M., Nhuan, N. P., and Walker, T. H., 2008, Biofuels Engineering Process Technology, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Wei, L., Pordesimo, L. O., Igathinathane, C., and Batchelor, W. D., 2009, “Process Engineering Evaluation of Ethanol Production From Wood Through Bioprocessing and Chemical Catalysis,” Biomass Bioenergy, 33, pp. 255–266. [CrossRef]
Kumar, P., Barrett, D. M., Delwiche, M. J., and Stroeve, P., 2009, “Methods of Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Efficient Hydrolysis and Biofuel Production,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, pp. 3713–3729. [CrossRef]
Paulrud, S., Mattsson, J., and Nilsson, C., 2002, “Particle and Handling Characteristics of Wood Fuel Powder: Effects of Different Mills,” Fuel Process. Technol., 76(1), pp. 23–39. [CrossRef]
Zhang, M., Song, X. X., Zhang, P. F., Pei, Z. J., Deines, T. W., and Wang, D. H., 2012, “Size Reduction of Cellulosic Biomass in Biofuel Manufacturing: A Study on Confounding Effects of Particle Size and Biomass Crystallinity,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(1), p. 011009. [CrossRef]
Zhu, L., O'Dwyer, J. P., Chang, V. S., Granda, C. B., and Holtzapple, M. T., 2007, “Structural Features Affecting Biomass Enzymatic Digestibility,” Bioresour. Technol., 99(9), pp. 3817–3828. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Boothroyd, G., and Knight, W. A., 2006, Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL.
Wang, K., Jiang, J. X., Xu, F., and Sun, R. C., 2009, “Influence of Steaming Pressure on Steam Explosion Pretreatment of Lespedeza Stalks (Lespedeza Crytobotrya): Part 1—Characteristics of Degraded Cellulose,” Polym. Degrad. Stab., 94, pp. 1379–1388. [CrossRef]
Campbell, M. K., and Farrell, S. O., 2011, Biochemistry, 7th ed., Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.
Snyder, L. R., Kirkland, J. J., and Dolan, J. W., 2009, Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ.
Juneja, B. L., Sekhon, G. S., and Seth, N., 2003, Fundamentals of Metal Cutting and Machine Tools, 2nd ed., New Age International Ltd., New Delhi, India.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Preparation of wood cylinders using a hole saw

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Geometry of the cutting tool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Illustration of the cutting process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Controlling of particle length using different numbers of slots (four slots in this illustration)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Illustration for particle size measurement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Crystalline and amorphous regions in cellulose (after Hu, 2008)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Results on particle thickness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pictures of produced particles using three different numbers of slots

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Results on particle surface area

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Results on chip (particle) thickness ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Results on biomass crystallinity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Results on sugar yield




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In