0
Technology Reviews

Issues in Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Cutter–Rock Interaction From a Metal Machining Point of View—Part II: Bit Performance and Rock Cutting Mechanics

[+] Author and Article Information
Kornel Ehmann

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern University,
Evanston, IL 60208

References numbered [1] to [100] are listed in Part I. Che, D., Han, P., Guo, P., and Ehmann, K., 2012, “Issues in Polycrystalline Diamond Compact Cutter–Rock Interaction From a Metal Machining Point of View—Part I: Temperature, Stresses, and Forces,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 134(6), p. 064001.

Contributed by the Manufacturing Engineering Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING. Manuscript received August 6, 2012; final manuscript received August 17, 2012; published online November 1, 2012. Editor: Y. Lawrence Yao.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 134(6), 064002 (Nov 01, 2012) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007623 History: Received August 06, 2012; Revised August 17, 2012

In Part I of this paper, the issues related to temperature, stress and force were reviewed and parallels were drawn between both metal machining and rock cutting. Part II discusses the issues more directly related to polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) bit performance and rock mechanics. However, relevant issues in various metal cutting processes will continue to be presented to clarify the gaps and similarities between these two classes of processes.

Copyright © 2012 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Bottomhole patterns generated by PDC bits during laboratory tests: (a) true rotating pattern, (b) star pattern, and (c) chaotic pattern [122]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Drill tip whirl in metal drilling: (a) pentagon pattern at the hole bottom, (b) simulation results for the pentagon shaped hole [119], and (c) schematic of drill motion and cutting edge locus adapted from Ref. [121]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Bit balling phenomenon during shale drilling using PDC bits [123]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Angular speed vibration during stick-slip oscillations [131]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Drillable zone of PDC bits adapted from Ref. [148]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Penetration performance of various bit types [153]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Novel bit designs for hard-rock drilling: (a) hybrid drill bit (courtesy of Baker Hughes Company) [156]; (b) hybrid TSP roller drill bit [152]; and (c) antiwhirl bit [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Micrographic photos of worn diamond tools in machining processes: (a) wear in ductile mode ultraprecision cutting [162]; (b) microchipping in brittle mode ultraprecision cutting [162]; (c) wear of cutting tools with CVD diamond inserts in turning [163]; and (d) wear of cutting tools with PDC diamond inserts in turning [163]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Schematic of the wear and fracture mechanisms observed on PDC cutters: (1) microcracks; (2) microchipping on cutting edge; (3) abrasion; (4) chipping due to side impacts; (5) fatigue and delamination; (6) Hertizian cracks; and (7) chemical wear [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Wear and failure pictures of PDC cutters: (a) microchipping; (b) gross fracture; and (c) gross fracture, delamination, and heat checking [10]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Schematic of crack distribution under indentation [183]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Wedging action of a cutter adapted from Ref. [177]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

General rock removal processes: (a) rotary action and (b) percussion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Periodic cuttings during a dragging action [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Forces in Fairhurst and Lacabanne's model adapted from Ref. [7]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Rock removal mechanism in Nishimatsu's model: a is the primary crushed zone, b is the secondary crushed zone, and c is the overcutting zone [62]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Modeling of rock using the PFC3D method [208]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Modeling of rock using the R-T2D method [209]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Boundary condition setup and simulation results of rock cutting processes [222]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

The results of rock cutting modeling using the PFC2D code [223]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Rock cutting modeling using R-T2D code [209]

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In