0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Neuro-Fuzzy System for Tool Condition Monitoring in Metal Cutting

[+] Author and Article Information
Omez S. Mesina, Reza Langari

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-3123

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 123(2), 312-318 (Apr 01, 2000) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1363599 History: Received April 01, 1997; Revised April 01, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Chryssolouris, G., and Domroese, M., 1988, “Sensor Integration for Tool Wear Estimating in Machining,” Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, pp. 115–123.
Li, S., Elbestawi, M. A., and Du, R. X., 1992, “Fuzzy Logic Approach for Multi-Sensor Process Monitoring in Machining,” Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 55 , pp. 1–16.
Ko,  T. J., and Cho,  D. W., 1994, “Tool Wear Monitoring in Diamond Turning by Fuzzy Pattern Recognition,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 116, No. 2, pp. 225–232.
Fang,  X. D., 1995, “Expert System-Supported Fuzzy Diagnosis of Finish-Turning Process States,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 35, No. 6, pp. 913–924.
Rangwala,  S., and Dornfeld,  D., 1990, “Sensor Integration Using Neural Networks for Intelligent Tool Condition Monitoring,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., 112, pp. 219–228.
Masory, O., 1991, “Monitoring Machining Processes Using Multi-Sensor Readings Fused by Artificial Neural Networks,” 7th International Conference on Computer-Aided Production Engineering, 28 , No. 1–2, pp. 231–240.
Emel, E., 1991, “Tool Wear Detection By Neural Network Based Acoustic Emission Sensing,” Control of Manufacturing Processes, ASME, pp. 79–85.
Wang, Z., and Dornfeld, D., 1992, “In-Process Tool Wear Monitoring Using Neural Networks,” Proceedings of the 1992 Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, pp. 263–270.
Elanayar, S., and Shin, Y., 1992, “Robust Tool Wear Estimation via Radial Basis Function Neural Networks,” Winter Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 57 , pp. 37–51.
Weis, Wolfgang, 1994, “Processing of Optical Sensor Data for Tool Condition Monitoring Wit Neural Networks,” WESCON Conference Proceedings, Los Angeles, CA, pp. 351–355.
Rahman,  M., Zhou,  Q., and Hong,  G. S., 1995, “On-Line Cutting State Recognition Using a Neural Network,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 0, No. 2, pp. 87–92.
Choudhury,  S. K., Jain,  V. K., and Ramo Rao,  Ch. V. V., 1999, “On-Line Monitoring of Tool Wear in Turning Using a Neural Network,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 39, No. 3, pp. 489–504.
Niu,  Y. M., Wong,  Y. S., Hong,  G. S., and Liu,  T. I., 1998, “Multi-Category Classification of Tool Conditions Using Wavelets Packets and ART2 Networks,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 120, No. 4, pp. 807–816.
Matsumura,  T., Obikawa,  T., Shirkashi,  T., and Usui,  E., 1992, “On the Development of Expert System for Selecting the Optimum Cutting Condition,” Journal of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering, 58, No. 10, pp. 1691–1696.
Teshima,  T., Shibasaka,  T., Takuma,  M., Yamamoto,  A., and Iwata,  K., 1993, “Estimation of Cutting Tool Life by Processing Tool Image Data with Neural Network,” CIRP Ann., 42, No. 1, pp. 59–62.
Burke,  L., 1992, “Competitive Learning Based Approaches to Tool Wear Identification,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., 22, No. 3, pp. 559–563.
Burke,  L., and Rangwala,  S., 1991, “Tool Condition Monitoring in Metal Cutting: A Neural Network Approach,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2, Issue 5, pp. 269–280.
Tansel,  I. N., 1994, “Identification of the Pre-failure Phase in Microdrilling Operations with Multiple Sensors,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 34, No. 3, pp. 351–364.
Langari, R., and Tomizuka, M., 1990, “Self Organizing Fuzzy Linguistic Control with Application to Arc Welding,” Proceedings of the 1990 IEEE Workshop on Intelligent Systems & Robots-IROS.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Architecture of the neuro-fuzzy system. (Note: Cutting Parameter Index or C.P.I., reflects the intensity of the machining process and is described in Section 4.)
Grahic Jump Location
A 4-5-1 Neural Network to predict tool condition
Grahic Jump Location
Adapting the fuzzy sets
Grahic Jump Location
Fuzzy set definition for force (before tuning) shown in relation to the occurrence of force values in the data
Grahic Jump Location
Fuzzy set definitions (a) before tuning (b) after tuning

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In