Research Papers

Development and Application of Models for Steelmaking and Casting Environmental Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Karl R. Haapala1

 School of Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Engineering, Oregon State University, 204 Rogers Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331Karl.Haapala@oregonstate.edu

Adrian V. Catalina

 Product Development & Global Technology, Caterpillar Inc., P.O. Box 1875, Peoria, IL 61656Catalina_Adrian_V@cat.com

Michael L. Johnson

 Product Development & Global Technology, Caterpillar Inc., P.O. Box 1875, Peoria, IL 61656Johnson_Michael_L@cat.com

John W. Sutherland

 Division of Environmental and Ecological Engineering, Purdue University, 322 Potter Engineering Center, West Lafayette, IN 47907jwsuther@purdue.edu


Corresponding author.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 134(5), 051013 (Sep 28, 2012) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4007463 History: Received May 09, 2011; Revised August 04, 2012; Published September 25, 2012; Online September 28, 2012

Growing interest in sustainability is driving manufacturers to improve the environmental performance of their products and processes. The production of steel and steel products consumes materials and energy resources, and creates wastes and emissions. Industry leaders and policy makers have identified iron/steel and metal casting as areas of concern from an environmental perspective. By evaluating steel product manufacturing processes commonly employed in the heavy equipment industry, environmental impacts can be mitigated during product and process design. A process modeling approach that is focused on improving the environmental performance of steel product manufacturing is developed and demonstrated. The process models focus on part production employing electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking and sand casting with chemical binders, and relate process energy and material inputs and outputs to product and process design characteristics. The models are based on scientific principles, as well as empirical data reported in the literature. Models of the two processes are applied to assess the production of a representative ground engaging tool (GET) component. It is found that EAF electricity use can be reduced by more than 30% and process-related CO2 emissions by nearly 20% over initial settings. Replacing the polyurethane nobake sand mold binder with a low nitrogen furan binder is predicted to reduce casting emissions by more than 50%, and sulfur dioxide emissions by over 90%. Thus, the models are capable of estimating changes in environmental performance due to modifications in material type, part geometry, and process parameters. This process modeling approach demonstrates improvements in environmental performance for the production of a GET component, and can be extended to assess and compare other steel alloys and components.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

EAF mass-energy balance model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Partitioning of elements [72-73]

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Representative GET tip, (a) front and (b) back

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Sensitivity of materials inputs for the five scenarios (A-E)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Responses of performance criteria for each of the five scenarios (A-E)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Representative sand casting (a) pattern and (b) core for GET tips

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

As-cast GET tips (opaque) and pyrolyzed region of sand (transparent)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Emissions from casting (a) major chemicals by type and (b) HAP components using PUNB molds and PUCB cores (88 parts/batch)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Emissions from casting (a) major chemicals by type and (b) HAP components using furan molds and PUCB cores (88 parts/batch)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In