0
Research Papers

Methods for Improving Chucking Accuracy

[+] Author and Article Information
Jeongmin Byun

 Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN 56301jbyun@stcloudstate.edu

C. Richard Liu

 School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907cliu@purdue.edu

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 134(5), 051004 (Sep 25, 2012) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005947 History: Received December 02, 2008; Revised January 19, 2012; Published September 25, 2012

Since recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of hard turning over other abrasive machining processes as a finishing process in terms of surface integrity, a strong need has existed to improve the performance of chucking. It is because the poor repeatability and accuracy in the positioning of chucked workpieces became the major bottleneck in the implementation of finish hard turning for precision mechanical components. However, the understanding of chucking has not been adequate nor has any systematic method been reported for improving chucking accuracy. In this paper, all the major factors that affect the positioning accuracy and repeatability of a chucked workpiece have been identified by error budgeting and systematic measurements. In addition, the characteristics of these factors as well as their effect on chucking accuracy were investigated. From the results, a chucking error map that summarizes the relations between these factors and the positioning error of a chucked workpiece was developed. Then, a series of experiments were carried out to test the effectiveness of the error budget. The results demonstrated that the knowledge on these factors was accurate and it could be effectively used to improve the positioning accuracy and repeatability of a range of cylindrical workpieces in chucking. It was also shown that hard turning alone, without any extra machining process, could satisfy the same level of concentricity, which is currently achieved by finish grinding when chucking accuracy was improved by the method developed. Even if this study was originally intended for the implementation of finish hard turning for replacing finish grinding, the methods developed in this study can be used to improve the final form accuracy of cylindrical workpieces in other finishing processes including grinding, if any work holding devices similar to chucks are used to hold the workpieces. The methodology and the procedures for improving chucking accuracy are covered in a pending patent by the authors.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Topics: Errors
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Definition of parameters in chucking

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Vector representation of the centering error of a chucked workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Chucking error map

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Experimental setup for error measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

The reduction results of chucking error by step-by-step approach for workpiece type I (OD surface as a major locating surface; length to diameter ratio 0.8, average weight 15.5 kg)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Concentricity error from hard turning versus eccentricity from the probe measurements

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

The reduction results of chucking error by step-by-step approach for workpiece type II (end face as a major locating surface; length to diameter ratio 0.5, average weight 0.95 kg)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In