Research Papers

Scaling Analysis and a Critical Thickness Criterion for Thermosetting Composites

[+] Author and Article Information
Thomas W. Secord

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

Susan C. Mantell, Kim A. Stelson

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 133(1), 011005 (Jan 24, 2011) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4003338 History: Received June 22, 2010; Revised November 26, 2010; Published January 24, 2011; Online January 24, 2011

In thermosetting composite manufacturing, part thickness, mold temperature, pressure, and resin kinetics can affect the uniformity of cure in the finished part. If the interaction of these parameters is not accounted for, then unwanted overshoot of the processing temperature can occur within a part during cure. In this paper, the relationship between processing and material parameters was considered to establish a critical thickness separating parts having large overshoots from parts having small overshoots. The one-dimensional heat equation with an autocatalytic relation for curing was used to model the process. The equations were placed in dimensionless form using a scaling analysis. A finite difference model was also created to calculate part temperatures during cure as a function of the key dimensionless groups. For experimental validation, composite plates of varying thickness were fabricated from a glass fiber prepreg material, and the processing conditions were varied according to thickness. The scaling analysis identified five dimensionless groups. Two of these groups were found to affect the overshoot of the temperature: the modified Damköhler number Da, which includes the heat generated during the reaction, and the dimensionless temperature ramp rate t¯rise, which describes the tooling temperature ramp rate relative to the natural time scale of the heat transfer. There was good agreement between the numerical model prediction of temperature overshoot and the experimental data. The results also confirm that the behavior of thin and thick parts, as defined by the relative temperature overshoot, can be well defined and predicted by the two proposed dimensionless groups: Da and t¯rise.

Copyright © 2011 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Assumed processing cycle for model development

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Composite centerline temperature compared with the tooling temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Comparison of theoretical and measured overshoots in composite

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Contours of θ as a function of Da∗ and t¯rise



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In