0
Technical Briefs

Performance of Al-6063 Primary and Secondary Billets Used in Hot Aluminum Extrusion

[+] Author and Article Information
S. S. Akhtar, A. F. M. Arif, B. S. Yilbas

Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 131(5), 054502 (Sep 24, 2009) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4000098 History: Received June 22, 2008; Revised August 18, 2009; Published September 24, 2009

The service life of tooling plays an important part in the economics of the extrusion process. A number of causes are considered responsible for initiating damage to the dies before its designated life is reached. Apart from other factors such as die design and manufacturing, heat treatment, working conditions, etc, the performance of the die can directly be related to the billet quality used in the extrusion press. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of Al-6063 billet source (primary or secondary) on extrusion die failure, based on microstructural investigation. A secondary (remelt) billet cast in-house at a local extrusion plant is compared with a primary (smelter) billet by applying different material characterization techniques, including optical microscopy, Vickers microhardness measurement, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). It is observed that a secondary billet has a comparatively coarse grain structure, nonhomogeneous distribution of secondary phases, inclusions, and high hardness that can be associated with poor casting and homogenization practice. In view of present results, some suggestions during in-house billet preparation of secondary billets have been formulated for improved die service life.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

XRD analysis of (a) primary billet and (b) secondary billet at three locations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Variation in hardness in primary and secondary billet types

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Optical micrographs of (a) primary billet and(b) secondary billet: homogenized edge samples

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Optical micrographs of (a and b) primary billet, (c and d) secondary billet: homogenized near-core samples

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Optical micrographs of (a and b) primary billet and (c and d) secondary billet: homogenized core samples

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In