0
Research Papers

Quality and Inspection of Machining Operations: CMM Integration to the Machine Tool

[+] Author and Article Information
Laine Mears, Thomas Kurfess

 Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634

John T. Roth

 Penn State Erie, Erie, PA 16563

Dragan Djurdjanovic

 University of Texas, Austin, TX 78713

Xiaoping Yang

 Cummins Inc., Columbus, IN 47202

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 131(5), 051006 (Sep 08, 2009) (13 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3184085 History: Received April 01, 2008; Revised May 29, 2009; Published September 08, 2009

Dimensional measurement feedback in manufacturing systems is critical in order to consistently produce quality parts. Considering this, methods and techniques by which to accomplish this feedback have been the focus of numerous studies in recent years. Moreover, with the rapid advances in computing technology, the complexity and computational overhead that can be feasibly incorporated in any developed technique have dramatically improved. Thus, techniques that would have been impractical for implementation just a few years ago can now be realistically applied. This rapid growth has resulted in a wealth of new capabilities for improving part and process quality and reliability. In this paper, overviews of recent advances that apply to machining are presented. More specifically, research publications pertaining to the use of coordinate measurement machines to improve the machining process are discussed.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Framework of research in measurement integration to machining. System integration issues between measurement and machining include functional and communication interoperability, as well as efficient planning for obtaining measurement data and its use in enhancing machine control.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Self-centering probe for rapid machine tool characterization (35)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

CMM predicted dynamic error used in compensation (56)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Inspection path planning. The number of points, their location, and the inspection path are planned to minimize inspection time while maintaining acceptable accuracy (48).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Measurement error caused by machining cusp (46)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Information flowchart of autonomous coordinate measuring planning (ACMP) system (57)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Iterative error measurement and compensation system (63)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Machined part error: geometry, force, thermal, and wear sources (63)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Workflow for rapid on-machine probe calibration (30)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Machine measurement and compensation using FCS (77)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Simulation of CMM integration to flexible machining line (102)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Virtual machining and measurement cell architecture (103). (a) Traditional development is time-consuming and expensive due to physical prototype iterations; (b) VMMC addresses optimization analytically to save time and cost.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Virtual measuring process of VMMC. Part measurement is simulated and the results are used to optimize the inspection efficiency.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In