0
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | Volume 130 | Issue 5 | Research Paper
Research Papers

A Cutting Rate Model for Reciprocating Sawing

[+] Author and Article Information
Joseph P. Domblesky1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233

Thomas P. James

 Techtronic Industries Ltd., Tsuen Wan, New Territories, Hong Kong

G. E. Otto Widera

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI 53233

1

Corresponding author.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 130(5), 051015 (Sep 11, 2008) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2976143 History: Received October 18, 2007; Revised June 24, 2008; Published September 11, 2008
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

In the present paper, the reciprocating sawing process is analyzed, and a model for linear cutting rate is developed. The resulting model is based on an orthogonal approximation of cutting at individual teeth and accounts for elastic and plastic indentation. Cutting rates obtained from an instrumented sawing fixture show good agreement with predicted results for the range of conditions considered. Cutting rate was found to be proportional to thrust force and reciprocating rate though this behavior is influenced by edge radius and flow stress at higher levels. While it was not possible to decouple the effect of pitch and blade set, it was confirmed that coarser pitch blades do provide higher cutting rates.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
Thompson, P. J., 1974, “Factors Influencing the Sawing Rate of Hard Ductile Metals During Power Hacksaw and Bandsaw Operations,” Met. Technol. (London), 1 , pp. 437–443.
2
Colwell, L. V., and McKee, R. E., 1954, “Evaluation of Bandsaw Performance,” Trans. ASME, 77 , pp. 951–960.
3
Andersson, C., Andersson, M. T., and Stahl, J. E., 2001, “Bandsawing Part I: Cutting Force Model Including Effects of Positional Errors, Tool Dynamics and Wear,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.  [CrossRef], 41 , pp. 227–236.
4
Ahmad, M. M., Hogan, B., and Goode, E., 1989, “Effect of Machining Parameters and Workpiece Shape on a Bandsawing Process,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 29 , pp. 173–183.
5
Mischke, C. R., and Shigley, J. E., 1989, "Mechanical Engineering Design", McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 2.
6
Liu, C. K., and Smith, J. O., 1953, “Stresses Due to Tangential and Normal Loads on an Elastic Solid With Application to Some Contact Stress Problems,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 20 , pp. 157–166.
7
Dumas, G., and Baronet, C. N., 1971, “Elastoplastic Indentation of a Half-Space by an Infinitely Long Rigid Circular Cylinder,” Int. J. Mech. Sci.  [CrossRef], 13 , pp. 519–530.
8
Domblesky, J., James, T. P., and Widera, G. E. O., 2006, “Experimental Investigation of Reciprocating Sawing,” Trans. North Am. Manuf. Res. Inst. SME, 34 , pp. 531–538.
9
James, T. P., 2002, “Application of Cutting Mechanics to Reciprocating Sawing,” Ph.D. thesis, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.
10
Tabor, D., 1951, "The Hardness of Metals", Clarendon, Oxford, UK, Appendix V.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope as a function of thrust force for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and a 14 tpi blade pitch
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope as a function of thrust force for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and a 14 tpi blade pitch
Figure 7

Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope as a function of thrust force for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and a 14 tpi blade pitch

Grahic Jump Location
+Subsurface distortion of the AISI 1018 steel workpiece after reciprocating sawing for applied thrust forces of (a) 22.24 N, (b) 44.48 N, and (c) 88.96 N; shown at 400× magnification
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Subsurface distortion of the AISI 1018 steel workpiece after reciprocating sawing for applied thrust forces of (a) 22.24 N, (b) 44.48 N, and (c) 88.96 N; shown at 400× magnification
Figure 6

Subsurface distortion of the AISI 1018 steel workpiece after reciprocating sawing for applied thrust forces of (a) 22.24 N, (b) 44.48 N, and (c) 88.96 N; shown at 400× magnification

Grahic Jump Location
+Predicted envelope and experimental cutting rates as a function of reciprocating rate for an applied 31.1 N thrust force
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Predicted envelope and experimental cutting rates as a function of reciprocating rate for an applied 31.1 N thrust force
Figure 5

Predicted envelope and experimental cutting rates as a function of reciprocating rate for an applied 31.1 N thrust force

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of the predicted cutting rate envelope generated from the specified flow stress and edge radii tolerances and experimental cutting rates used in the model validation
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of the predicted cutting rate envelope generated from the specified flow stress and edge radii tolerances and experimental cutting rates used in the model validation
Figure 4

Comparison of the predicted cutting rate envelope generated from the specified flow stress and edge radii tolerances and experimental cutting rates used in the model validation

Grahic Jump Location
+Depiction of the contact area between an individual cutting edge and the workpiece surface
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Depiction of the contact area between an individual cutting edge and the workpiece surface
Figure 3

Depiction of the contact area between an individual cutting edge and the workpiece surface

Grahic Jump Location
+Depiction of cutting edge wear geometry observed on (a) set teeth and (b) raker teeth for metal cutting blades
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Depiction of cutting edge wear geometry observed on (a) set teeth and (b) raker teeth for metal cutting blades
Figure 2

Depiction of cutting edge wear geometry observed on (a) set teeth and (b) raker teeth for metal cutting blades

Grahic Jump Location
+Typical reciprocating saw with key features indicated
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Typical reciprocating saw with key features indicated
Figure 1

Typical reciprocating saw with key features indicated

Grahic Jump Location
+Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope obtained using different blade pitches for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and 44.5 N thrust force
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope obtained using different blade pitches for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and 44.5 N thrust force
Figure 8

Comparison of experimental cutting rates and predicted envelope obtained using different blade pitches for a reciprocating rate of 1700 spm and 44.5 N thrust force

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines> Chapter 5
Hydrodynamic Lubrication
Design of Mechanical Bearings in Cardiac Assist Devices
On-Line a Predictive Model of Cutting Force in Turning with 3 Axis Acceleration Transducer Using Neural Network
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)
Analysis on Influence of the Tool Orthogonal Rake on Cutting Force, Temperature and Deformation
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Cutting Force Analysis of Turn-Milling Micro-Miniature Parts
International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Technology (ICMET-London 2011)
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In