0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Stream-of-Variation Modeling—Part I: A Generic Three-Dimensional Variation Model for Rigid-Body Assembly in Single Station Assembly Processes

[+] Author and Article Information
Wenzhen Huang

Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, MA 02747whuang@umassd.edu

Jijun Lin

Engineering Systems Division, School of Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307jijunlin@mit.edu

Michelle Bezdecny

 GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY 12309bezdecny@research.ge.com

Zhenyu Kong

School of Industrial Engineering and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078james.kong@okstate.edu

Dariusz Ceglarek

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706darek@engr.wisc.edu

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 129(4), 821-831 (Feb 28, 2007) (11 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2738117 History: Received August 14, 2006; Revised February 28, 2007

A stream-of-variation analysis (SOVA) model for three-dimensional (3D) rigid-body assemblies in a single station is developed. Both product and process information, such as part and fixture locating errors, are integrated in the model. The model represents a linear relationship of the variations between key product characteristics and key control characteristics. The generic modeling procedure and framework are provided, which involve: (1) an assembly graph (AG) to represent the kinematical constraints among parts and fixtures, (2) an unified method to transform all constraints (mating interface and fixture locators etc.) into a 3-2-1 locating scheme, and (3) a 3D rigid model for variation flow in a single-station process. The generality of the model is achieved by formulating all these constraints with an unified generalized fixture model. Thus, the model is able to accommodate various types of assemblies and provides a building block for complex multistation assembly model, in which the interstation interactions are taken into account. The model has been verified by using Monte Carlo simulation and a standardized industrial software. It provides the basis for variation control through tolerance design analysis, synthesis, and diagnosis in manufacturing systems.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Examples of kinematics joints

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Case study for validation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

(a) Relative errors of SOVA versus MC and (b) relative error of SOVA model versus 3DCS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Mating feature plane at arbitrary position and orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

(a) Rotation as a vector and (b) rotation in coordinate systems B and D

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Point definition at mating planes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Assembly chain in a single station

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Examples of kinematics joints: (a) generalized fixture layout, (b) 3-2-1 fixture scheme

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Related

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In