Two Efficient Algorithms of Plastic Integration for Sheet Forming Modeling

[+] Author and Article Information
Y. M. Li, B. Abbès, Y. Q. Guo

Laboratory of Mechanics, Materials & Structures, Faculty of Sciences, University of Reims, BP1039, 51687, Reims, France

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 129(4), 698-704 (Feb 13, 2007) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2738125 History: Received July 20, 2006; Revised February 13, 2007

A fast method called the “inverse approach” for sheet forming modeling is based on the assumptions of the proportional loading and simplified tool actions. To improve the stress estimation, the pseudo-inverse approach was recently developed: some realistic intermediate configurations are geometrically determined to consider the deformation paths; two new efficient algorithms of plastic integration are proposed to consider the loading history. In the direct scalar algorithm (DSA), an elastic unloading-reloading factor γ is introduced to deal with the bending-unbending effects; the equation in unknown stress vectors is transformed into a scalar equation using the notion of the equivalent stress, thus the plastic multiplier Δλ can be directly obtained without iterative resolution scheme. In the γ-return mapping algorithm, the equivalent plastic strain increment estimated by DSA is taken as the initial solution in Simo’s return mapping algorithm, leading to a stable, efficient, and accurate plastic integration scheme. The numerical experience has shown that these two algorithms give a considerable reduction of CPU time in the plastic integration.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Topics: Stress , Algorithms , Scalars
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Meshes before and after the mapping problem

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Mapping of mesh Di onto mesh Ci to obtain a regular mesh with the correct shape

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Distorted mesh obtained by surface minimization (H=7mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Intermediate configurations of SWIFT

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Determination of an intermediate configuration by minimization of sheet surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

von Mises stress distribution along the radial direction on the middle surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Punch force in function of punch travel

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Thickness distribution along the radial direction (h0=1mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Thickness distribution obtained by different codes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

N-R convergence given by Simo’s RMA and the present γ-RMA

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Plastic integration on a great increment with bending-unbending effect

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Geometry of the SWIFT drawing process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Elastic unloading and reloading; elastic prediction and plastic correction

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Distribution of the maximal stress along the radial direction on the lower fiber

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Distribution of the maximal stress along the radial direction on the upper fiber



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In