0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Modeling Machining Geometric Variation in a N-2-1 Fixturing Scheme

[+] Author and Article Information
Weiping Zhong1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125

S. Jack Hu

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125

1

Now with Bayer HealthCare, Elkhart, IN 46515.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 128(1), 213-219 (Apr 08, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2114927 History: Received October 16, 2003; Revised April 08, 2005

Fixtures are used to locate and constrain workpieces in machining. Fixture properties, such as accuracy and locator layout schemes, directly affect the resultant geometric variation on the machined workpiece surfaces. N-2-1 fixturing schemes (N>3) are often used for large or compliant workpieces in machining. However, the impact of N-2-1 fixturing on product geometric variation is not well understood because of the uncertainty of contact under the overconstraint condition. This paper presents a modeling methodology to study the machining geometric variation in a 4-2-1 fixturing scheme. The model integrates the fixture-workpiece interactions resulted from the rigid-body variation in fixtures, workpieces, and machine tools, and the static deformation under external forces. The uncertainty of the fixture-workpiece contact condition due to the 4-2-1 constraint condition is modeled using the minimum potential energy theory. A numerical example of face milling is presented to demonstrate the methodology.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

A 3-2-1 fixturing scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Typical 4-2-1 fixturing system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Contact modes in a 4-2-1 fixturing scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Representation of the workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Representation of the machining operation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Representation of the fixturing error

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Determination of the locator-workpiece contact pair

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Sample workpiece

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Results of the 4-2-1 fixturing

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In