0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

A Unique Methodology for Chatter Stability Mapping in Simultaneous Machining

[+] Author and Article Information
Nejat Olgac

Mechanical Engineering,  University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3139olgac@engr.uconn.edu

Rifat Sipahi1

Mechanical Engineering,  University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269-3139

1

Currently at Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France under Chateaubriand Bourse.

J. Manuf. Sci. Eng 127(4), 791-800 (Feb 15, 2005) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2037086 History: Received June 18, 2004; Revised February 15, 2005

A novel analytical tool is presented to assess the stability of simultaneous machining (SM) dynamics, which is also known as parallel machining. In SM, multiple cutting tools, which are driven by multiple spindles at different speeds, operate on the same workpiece. Its superior machining efficiency is the main reason for using SM compared with the traditional single tool machining (STM). When SM is optimized in the sense of maximizing the rate of metal removal constrained with the machined surface quality, typical “chatter instability” phenomenon appears. Chatter instability for single tool machining (STM) is broadly studied in the literature. When formulated for SM, however, the problem becomes notoriously more complex. There is practically no literature on the SM chatter, except a few ad hoc and inconclusive reports. This study presents a unique treatment, which declares the complete stability picture of SM chatter within the mathematical framework of multiple time-delay systems (MTDS). What resides at the core of this development is our own paradigm, which is called the cluster treatment of characteristic roots (CTCR). This procedure determines the regions of stability completely in the domain of the spindle speeds for varying chip thickness. The new methodology opens the research to some interesting directions. They, in essence, aim towards duplicating the well-known “stability lobes” concept of STM for simultaneous machining, which is clearly a nontrivial task.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Chatter stability lobes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Orthogonal turning process

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Functional block diagram of chatter regeneration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Typical stability lobes and constant stability margin lobes

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Conceptual depiction of simultaneous face milling. (a) Workpiece coupled. (b) Machine tool coupled.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Block diagram representing the simultaneous machining

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

(a) Uniform pitch. (b) Variable pitch.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

(a) Stability regions for 4mm axial depth-of-cut, with four-flute cutter milling on Al 356 (kernel: thick red, offspring: thin blue, stable zones: shaded). (b) Chatter frequencies (exhaustive) (rad∕s) vs. the kernel (τ1,τ2).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

(a) Comparison of CTCR (circle) and ((33), Fig. 2) (square) for pitch ratio=1. (b) 11/7.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Chatter stability chart in delay domain

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In